New Home wrote: » No, that was for everyone - if they don't have soil or wood for VIPs, they definitely don't have it for common folk.
Chancer3001 wrote: » A can of coke sinks in water. A can of diet coke floats. Full cans. Not empty, I mean.
Graces7 wrote: » And the mummieshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalia_Lombardo#Embalming This lovely child..
Working class heroes wrote: » Am I the only one who finds that very disturbing?
Candie wrote: » No, it's upsetting alright.
Graces7 wrote: » Why? It was another burial custom, and the parents of this small child were utterly devastated by her early death from pneumonia.. NB she has been seen to open and close her eyes\ She is so lovely. There are many youtubes on the Capucin crypt where she lies and where hundreds of other mummies also are..
Candie wrote: » It's just sad. Others may feel different, but I can only be sad at the body of a lost baby, preserved and now a curiosity.
New Home wrote: » I feel the same about bog bodies, Egyptian mummies, pre-Colombian mummies, etc. in museums - these were people, not sculptures or objects. But for some reason, I personally don't see that child (or the mummies) as a curiosity, she'd look the same if she had been embalmed and put in a closed coffin out of sight. I think her parents wanted her in that clear casket as if to say to the world, "We loved her so dearly and we lost her, please spare a thought for her when you see her and see she was a little person, not just an anonymous name on a gravestone, and maybe in seeing her you'll love her a little too and mourn her passing, too". There's a sort of reverence in the way she's been kept that is completely lacking in "museum exhibits". But I'm probably just being oversentimental.
Candie wrote: » I do understand your point of view, but to me it's too...public. She didn't make an adult decision to forgo privacy in death, it was made for her. I'm sure she slices through the heart of anyone who's lost a child.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » Don't ever Google memento mori photos so.
Ipso wrote: » Any relation to Lizzie?
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » Please keep posting. Add links if you think were up to it. :-)
Cortina_MK_IV wrote: » Sylvester Stallone got the part of Rocky by accident.
Chancer3001 wrote: » theres only one member of ZZ top who doesnt have a beard His name is Mr.Beard (Frank Beard)
mzungu wrote: » They are also the longest-running American rock band with no member changes. 1969 to present.
Chancer3001 wrote: » Maybe. I'm sure some old guy and his college buddies are still in a band together.
RobertKK wrote: » While around 10% of Irish people have red hair (ginger) 46% of Irish people carry the red hair genes. If both parents carry red hair genes, their offspring have a 25% of having red hair.
Greybottle wrote: » Anne Frank wasn't Dutch. She was German from birth until being declared stateless in 1942. Born in Frankfurt, she moved to Amsterdam aged 6 to escape anti-Jewish sentiment. She also wrote in her diary of Jews being gassed in Germany, so the story of the Holocaust was already known in 1942-43.
Ipso wrote: » But he wrote it by accident. On the acting theme, Gregory Peck was related to Thomas Ashe.
joeguevara wrote: » I don't understand what you mean he wrote it by accident? Was he writing a western and by accident turned into a bum boxer being given a chance to fight a world champion in Philadelphia?
wexie wrote: » Wouldn't mind an accident like that!! "Geez you'll never guess what happened to me?! I was doing my expenses and accidentally wrote a movie script!"