Spanish Eyes wrote: » I've often wondered what input grooms have into all the trappings of a BIG wedding? I suppose they just go along with it and leave the Bride and entourage to it. Easier for the Groom I think! Am I wrong?
Meadow Freezing Newsman wrote: » Yay! I'd love to see smaller 1950s style weddings come back into fashion. Even in the 80s and 90s brides still changed into 'Going away' clothes and were seen off by the guests, all standing on the steps of the hotel as the B&G drove away with cans and horseshoes trailing behind them. It was a lovely end to the wedding. Nowadays the bedraggled bride and stocious groom are usually the last to leave the resident's lounge, still in their wedding gear. It's just not the same.
splinter65 wrote: » My brother in law just refuses to go too. Especially family occasions. No excuses and no apologies. Just “thanks for asking but no, I don’t go to any of these things”. End of story now change the subject.
splinter65 wrote: » The brides “going away outfit” was nearly as important as the wedding dress. They’d disappear up to the room and reappear then hand in hand all dressed up. Then all the guests would link arms around them and the DJ would strike up with Congratulations! By Cliff Richard and everyone would be dancing around them in a ring singing along. And all the male guests would be slagging the groom about his wedding night even though everyone knew that they were at it like rabbits since they met. And the bride would be blushing while her mother dabbed at her eyes with a tissue. Off they’d head then in his car to Dublin Airport being chased down the hotel avenue, to get a flight to Santa Ponsa at some god awful hour. All the guests went back in the hotel to resume getting pissed.
....... wrote: » This post has been deleted.
EPAndlee wrote: » I just refuse to attend social events and the last invite I got to a wedding, I told them straight out I'm not going because I don't want to. I haven't been invited to anything since
Meadow Freezing Newsman wrote: » It's not that simple. Also, just because a lot of people don't enjoy something you happen to enjoy doesn't make them 'miserable'. Thinking so does make you rather arrogant though.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » This is a "marmite" issue, you either love or hate weddings. But even if you hate them, there are some of close family that it is very difficult to get out of, particularly with the "save the date" things, meaning you cannot inadvertently oooops, have booked a holiday for the same time" Trapped we are ! Anyway, I'm not a great lover of weddings myself have to say, but will go to immediate family ones no problem. I know everyone and get sitting beside like minded people. Usually good fun. Younger folk love them for the all day event, the drinking and dancing, and sing song into the small hours. I was one of them once! But now I'm getting older the only part of weddings I don't like is the dancing part. So now, we go to all the ceremonies, hang around, have a drink, eat the meal, chat to everyone, and then feck off about an hour into the dancing. We are NOT missed at all! I think the Queen has the right idea. At all the recent weddings she attended, she just toasted the B+G at the after ceremony drinks reception and fecked off home to her corgis!
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » Heres Johnny wrote: » I'm not attending a work wedding this summer. Said I've a weekend away booked. She got pissed off with me without saying so but I really don't care. Others moaning about 'having to go'. Ok. The phrase “have to go” doesn’t mean people have to go by law, or are forced to go. It means you can’t not go without repercussions.
Heres Johnny wrote: » I'm not attending a work wedding this summer. Said I've a weekend away booked. She got pissed off with me without saying so but I really don't care. Others moaning about 'having to go'.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » I don’t get the “you don’t have to go” philosophy either. You may chose to not go to the marriage of family or close friends but you will lose contact with them - it’s a big snub. Workmates you have to meet in work after the wedding - so you can’t refuse in that situation without a good reason. In small towns or some city suburbs even acquaintances can’t be avoided, so it’s awkward if you snub them.
paw patrol wrote: » ah jaysis are you for real? thankfully i'm old enough where those who are gonna married have done so and young enough that the next gen of kids are too young.
Dakota Dan wrote: » What's worse is this new gimmick of 3 day weddings.
theyoungchap wrote: » Well go home then misery guts the wedding will probably be better craic without you!!!
Patww79 wrote: » Just have a good excuse and give them a present. Once they get the money they won't really care anyway.