whelan2 wrote: » ye, just hope there's no more deaths Young stock were turning their noses up at the meal this morning and eating the silage ahead of the meal, now we know why
alps wrote: » Hope they make a fuss about your young lad, and treat him special...its much more than an economic hit to him
whelan2 wrote: » Where will I send the sample to find out what fertilizer it was?
alps wrote: » Have you an advisor or somebody that can represent you in this issue whelan? The supplier may be very upfront and fair, but if not, it would be an issue that you need like a hole in the head to resolve. The more power the supplier sees that you have on your side, the easier it will be to fix up, and it's not a bill you will have to cover at the end of the day. I'm sure the supplier has greater concerns at present, as it is likely that you are not the only farmer affected by this contamination, and if their quality control is such that it can lead to incidences such as this, well anything up to and including the pig feed contamination breach is possible....
Keepgrowing wrote: » alps wrote: » Have you an advisor or somebody that can represent you in this issue whelan? The supplier may be very upfront and fair, but if not, it would be an issue that you need like a hole in the head to resolve. The more power the supplier sees that you have on your side, the easier it will be to fix up, and it's not a bill you will have to cover at the end of the day. I'm sure the supplier has greater concerns at present, as it is likely that you are not the only farmer affected by this contamination, and if their quality control is such that it can lead to incidences such as this, well anything up to and including the pig feed contamination breach is possible.... Totally agree. Was thinking the same last night. We had a somewhat similar situation some years ago and while supplier was initially very agreeable the situation changed when the extent of the problem and redress became apparent. Find some professional independent person that can prepare your case in comprehensive and professional way, they will
K.G. wrote: » Hold your horses boys.wouldnt go down that route in hurry if they are acrowd you ve dealt with along time.that said i would comunicate by email rather phone in future on this matter.
whelan2 wrote: » Cctv has been checked and the trailer was clean before loading
Reggie. wrote: » So it's the loader then
whelan2 wrote: » Valuation on year old good ebi fr heifers?
mahoney_j wrote: » 900
einn32 wrote: » Lost future profits?
freedominacup wrote: » If you're looking to make money for some solicitor/barrister who you would have to carefully explain to the difference between fertiliser and weanlings head down that road.
freedominacup wrote: » It must be some cctv camera. They can't use most cctv systems for facial recognition but these lads can see into a trailer passing a fixed camera to see whether there's fert in it.
whelan2 wrote: » I have been on that road before. Both sides want it sorted. Meal is gone to be ploughed in. . Hopefully that's the end of it. I seem to be very unfortunate.
Say my name wrote: » Have they accepted responsibility?
whelan2 wrote: » Yes
Keepgrowing wrote: » In writing? Accepting responsibility and compensation are two very different things. All very unfortunate.