wally79 wrote: » How is an inspector supposed to tell the difference on the spot between an honest mistake and a deliberate fare evasion. They have to apply the rules consistently or not at all
BarryD2 wrote: » They are supposed to have brains, be judges of character and situation. They are a public face of the company.
flatty wrote: » They don't though. I've seen them completely avoid any dodgy looking lads. They are not at all consistent. The inspector was heavy handed here, could easily have been more understanding, and was, well, a bollox.
Camden Angry Nitwit wrote: » Of course they dont go near anyone dodgy, that could turn into work. The inspector was most like the typical one, spends most of his working days pondering whether to sniff his own armpit or scratch his bollox, his only brief respite from his miserable life is the odd opportunity to bully someone for making a mistake, so he jumped at this chance and went to town with it. No way I would have given him the leap card.
L1011 wrote: » Newbridge is not in the Leap zone. Sallins was only recently added There is realistically no chance of the appeal succeeding
JennyZ wrote: » I'm slightly confused about this .. and maybe a dumb question ( I get a Drogheda train from Rush) how is Newbridge 'not in the Leap zone' if people tag on in Pearse or Connolly to get a Newbridge train? Or is just taking a max fare on that stop. this person took a Portlaoise train though which obviously is causing added complications
JennyZ wrote: » I'm slightly confused about this .. and maybe a dumb question ( I get a Drogheda train from Rush) how is Newbridge 'not in the Leap zone' if people tag on in Pearse or Connolly to get a Newbridge (final destination) train? Or is just taking a max fare on that stop. this person took a Portlaoise train though which obviously is causing added complications
Squatter wrote: » True - I used my Ryanair ticket from Dublin to London to fly to Athens recently and the stewardess just smiled sweetly at me as I disembarked. :rolleyes:
[Deleted User] wrote: » What the **** are you talking about? I'll explain it simply: Irish Rail are state-owned. Our state's transport authority rolled out the Leap card over 6 years ago yet the state-owned rail company still hasn't fully implemented it. At the same time privately owned companies have managed to do it even though they're not integrated into other ticketing. It's a shambles.
Deleted User wrote: » What the **** are you talking about? I'll explain it simply: Irish Rail are state-owned. Our state's transport authority rolled out the Leap card over 6 years ago yet the state-owned rail company still hasn't fully implemented it. At the same time privately owned companies have managed to do it even though they're not integrated into other ticketing. It's a shambles.
L1011 wrote: » A final cutoff has to exist or else the reserve would have to cover the dearest standard class ticket as said above.
Bob24 wrote: » * for exemple not mixing local service and national service on the same trains; or if it is mixed segregating platforms for trains covering national service with special leap card validators which do require a minimum balance to go through which is sufficient for the full journey (while purely local trains wouldn't have that requirement)
L1011 wrote: » Neither of these are vaguely practical.
Cakerbaker wrote: » How would this work in stations like Pearse and Tara which have one platform in each direction and serve both dart and train services like Wexford and rosslare? How do you prevent people boarding the rosslare train to get off in Dun Laoighre or Bray which are 2 of dart stations served by these train services?
Bob24 wrote: » Rearrange the station to have 2 separate areas or if not possible/desirable reroute those trains trough stations which do have that option. Basically the first step is to admit something is broken because of some laziness with the way Leap Cards were introduced, and to have the will to fix it in the medium to long term (it is not a very quick fix and requires a bit of planning, but it is far from being a very hard one for a decent railway company).
Bob24 wrote: » Rearrange the station to have 2 separate areas or if not possible/desirable reroute those trains trough stations which do have that option.
If you plan properly it perfectly practical (and faster for long distance passengers) to separate local and national services on different trains. It doesn't mean trains can't use the same tracks, they just don't stop at the same stations or if they do stations have two separate areas.
devnull wrote: » The vast majority of stations only have one platform in each direction and certainly not enough room to add additional platforms or split them into two without massive infrastructure costs that are far better spent on other things.
devnull wrote: » Also you are aware that people often connect from commuter/intercity/DART trains to one another to continue their journey. Making some types of trains only stop at one or the other stops that from happening.
Bob24 wrote: » It is not just making the ticket validation system more consistant, it is also making intercity service faster by segregating it from local service. Not a bad way to spend money if you ask me (compared to other European countries our travel times between cities are pretty bad, improving it would both increase passenger confort and develop the economy of cities in the regions through better transport links with Dublin). As I said you can have multiple hub stations throughout the greater Dublin area with interconnection between local and national services. So no problem to combine both.
HonalD wrote: » Does breaking the rules not equal cheating the system?
Deleted User wrote: » All you have to do is log the leap card first time round, second offense = fine.
howiya wrote: » If only we could do away with Leap cards and let people use their debit cards instead