posturingpat wrote: » Am i really that old that the world has changed to a completely different place?
MSVforever wrote: » Did the attackers knew their victim or was it random? Either way hang em high.
citytillidie wrote: » Going by their social media accounts they are all friends
xzanti wrote: » Don't. I watched the first minute or so and I wish I hadn't I could almost feel those belts to the face, and I had it on silent Dirty, filthy scumbags. This world terrifies me. I have a 7 year old and a 7 month old. Both boys. I dread sending them out into it. I hope justice is served. By someone, anyone. A lynch mob preferably. Vermin.
Hector Savage wrote: » Yeah but they don't seem to be broken up like they were 15+ years ago, people too busy holding on to their phones to get a good angle ....
Grayson wrote: » wonder what their defence will try to say. The second that get's played in court they're fcuked.Can the people who stood around and did nothing be charged? They either decided not to intervene or were willing spectators.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » there is no obligation to intervene in a crime.
RoboRat wrote: » There is an obligation to report a crime, so therefore anyone present who didn't report it, could and should be charged. Justice Act, section 19.— (1) A person shall be guilty of an offence if he or she has information which he or she knows or believes might be of material assistance in— (a) preventing the commission by any other person of a relevant offence, or (b) securing the apprehension, prosecution or conviction of any other person for a relevant offence, and fails without reasonable excuse to disclose that information as soon as it is practicable to do so to a member of the Garda Síochána. (2) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a class A fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or both, or (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years or both.
400 Years Later wrote: » So this is a case of a scumbag bitch getting a taste of her own medicine?
NIMAN wrote: » I wonder will the likes of the BBC and utv report these new details?
PandaPoo wrote: » A post from the admin of the public awareness page said they contacted the media and was told they wouldn't be.
Nekarsulm wrote: » https://m.facebook.com/jamielee.barbour.3?tsid=0.09329202656009339&source=resulthttps://m.facebook.com/cora.m.campbell?pn_ref=friends_search And I "think" this is the 3rd one.https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100009533662004&pn_ref=friends_search
endacl wrote: » So. Much. Duckface.
anewme wrote: » It may change now with the outpouring of reality.
Jimbob1977 wrote: » I was at a parents' Internet and Social Media Awareness Session last night. It was a complete eye-opener. If I had daughters, I would be very worried. They seem much worse than the boys at bullying and getting too deep into social media. Jamie-Lee and Courtney. Is this Bangor, County Down or Bangor, Maine?
anewme wrote: » The social medya bit is the worrying bit. The fighting was always there.vicious as well. remember being summoned by someone to "have her out" after school. She thought I'd been eyeing up her boyfriend. It was not an option not to go politically and half the school was there waiting. So you had to face it. It was always the rough crowd bullied those they considered "posh".? That was 30 years ago. Can only imagine how it's got since.
Nekarsulm wrote: » This story only caught my interest because a bunch of us are heading to Bangor this weekend .......