FuzzyZoeller wrote: » Here you go! https://youtu.be/zA_stbW589Y
beertons wrote: » Pile driver set up this morning near Bill's house.
jmkennedyie wrote: » Which bridge? In other news The earthworks on stretch near Clane road intersection, and on roads north of canal, seem well advanced. Railway-bridge crane was still assembled by railway last Sunday. Didn't see any start to ramp construction either side of canal yet. A lot of ramp to build on the North of the canal Ground profiling to the North of M7 suggests to me they will replace existing bridge at Kerry Group with an entirely new structure just to the west. On M7 mainline seems they have most of the clearance done [within the current works area], and centreline drainage pipelaying in progress
marno21 wrote: » Yes, the bridge by Kerry is going to be demolished and replaced. Surprised it hasn't come down yet
pad199207 wrote: » The second junction design would be ideal with the larger roundabout and two over bridges. But ofcourse they will build the other one to save money
CeilingFly wrote: » and what is your experience for such a statement - or is it just a whine for the sake of it? The first design is the same design for most motorway bridges in the country with exception of the exceptionally busy M50 junctions and is more than suitable for current and future traffic flows. The second design would cost more and would be a complete waste of taxpayers money.
beertons wrote: » Bigger roundabout would be the better option imo, like the huge one in Kilcock over the n4.
sea12 wrote: » Ceeling fly do you work for the company building the project or the council ?
marno21 wrote: » This project will yield one major benefit to Naas: inbound delays in peak morning traffic will move to the area around Rathcoole instead of blocking up the Naas + Newbridge bypasses. For people commuting in the Naas area without going to Dublin it will be hugely beneficial.
pad199207 wrote: » Reported they are to spend up to €64,000 on a new roadside art project for the new Bypass. Now that is a waste of tax payers money, not a better designed junction with extra capacity for the future growth.
Chris_5339762 wrote: » My concern, if you want to call it that, is that they're working what, three months on the J9 to J10 widening, but J10 to J11 isn't started yet.
spacetweek wrote: » Art is never a waste of money.