nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Is it illegal to tear down posters

Mrhuth

Like you see some bs advertising like 20 signs of brainwashed VOTE NO everywhere. Are they authorised to be put up and can I tear them down for spreading fake information? There is one thing I cannot handle and that is propaganda.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

gmisk

thebull85 wrote: »

The ironic thing is these repeal the 8th crowd look like they would have a hard time getting anyone to impregnate them the f***in head on most of them.

Tide wouldnt take them out.

And the save the 8th crowd are all such rides!?!?!
David Quinn...John Mc Guirk....calm my quivering loins!

thebull85

MOD: thebull85 - don't post anything like this again, its out of order.

AndyBoBandy

donegal.

martingriff wrote: »

So we should allow abortions due to overpopulation. So how many do we need a year. If we do not achieve that number forced abortions?

WinnyThePoo

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

For me I’m going to either vote YES or not vote. The YES campaign is convincing me to not vote.

Lol

We've met people like you before.

martingriff

John_D80 wrote: »

Mad.

I know someone who is in favour of abortion as a means to cut social welfare expenditure.

Lunatics/idiots on both sides.

Heard of that 1 as it would cut down on 8 + child families as if they are thinking like that

kylith

John_D80 wrote: »

Mad.

I know someone who is in favour of abortion as a means to cut social welfare expenditure.

Lunatics/idiots on both sides.

Exactly. But if one says "I was going to vote one way but now I'm not because of the idiots and lunatics on that side" while completely ignoring the lunatics and idiots on the opposing side, then I believe that one was never going to vote that way in the first place; it is a tactic to attempt to smear the campaign.

martingriff

kylith wrote: »

I know of a guy who opposes abortion on the grounds that if we don't breed good, Irish stock we'll be overrun by immigrants.

Damn that's a new 1 on me

John_D80

kylith wrote: »

I know of a guy who opposes abortion on the grounds that if we don't breed good, Irish stock we'll be overrun by immigrants.

Mad.

I know someone who is in favour of abortion as a means to cut social welfare expenditure.

Lunatics/idiots on both sides.

Ash.J.Williams

My village is poster free and anyone of either persuasion gets dogs abuse and social media shamed if they disobey.... The no side usually spout sh1te about their human rights being violated

kylith

martingriff wrote: »

So we should allow abortions due to overpopulation. So how many do we need a year. If we do not achieve that number forced abortions?

I know of a guy who opposes abortion on the grounds that if we don't breed good, Irish stock we'll be overrun by immigrants.

vicwatson

The posters I dislike immensely are the ones put up without the contact information on them i.e. illegal ones, the only ones I've seen like this are from the no campaign so far

It's ridiculous that it's the Gardai's responsibility to take these down, and not the county council, what a waste of Garda resources

animaal

I'm undecided. But it's depressing to see how little tolerance is shown between the sides. Not to mention the number of people who are happy to disregard democracy in order to achieve their aim.

For me, the undermining of democracy has longer-reaching implications than the results of this referendum. I'd be happy to see a ban on posters, but not in the middle of a campaign just because one side sees the other being more successful with their postering.

Whichever side is going to win, I think it's important that the result can stand without any doubt over illegal actions by either side. And remember, when the dust dies down, we'll all still have to share this wet little country.

I also wonder what people's opinions are on re-runs. Should the result of this referendum (whatever that result is) stand for the foreseeable future? Or should we plan on a re-run every 20 years or so, to repeal/reestablish a constitutional ban?

martingriff

Mrhuth wrote: »

Yeah and that's all you can do, report someone for having a different opinion on you. Enjoy life and continue to support unwanted overpopulation of our planet. **** all animal habitats, **** all other creatures. We need to make space for more humans here. Because 7 billion is not enough.

So we should allow abortions due to overpopulation. So how many do we need a year. If we do not achieve that number forced abortions?

Trasna1

Mrhuth wrote: »

I'll post up a photograph of how many of them are in my street. I didn't count but it's at least 20 and they are on every lamp post. Who the hell is funding them? Why is it on issues like that, that they have unlimited funding. And then they go calling pro abortion activists nazis. What the ****? How many vote yes posters do you see compared to vote no? Same with gay marriage yeah because gay marriage affects your pathetic life so ****ing much that you have to prevent other people getting married. I am furious for not taking down the anti gay marriage posters. I won't make the same mistake again.

Didn't the yes campaign raise 500k from small donations? That have the money to put up posters but have decided not to (yet). The reason there are so many no posters is because that's how they side have decided to run their campaign.

Postering isn't very effective anyway. Go whinge about something more worthwhile - like posters and cable ties left up after the referendum.

martingriff

c.p.w.g.w wrote: »

But unable to survive outside the womb, suppose technically a parasite, can't survive on its own, needs a host...

And this is why some dislike the yes side using words like parasite, anyone who hates women vote no. I wonder have anyone told there you know I thought of you as nothing but a parasite using my body. For all of us who feel like turning away from the yes side because of this please do not. Vote for what you think is right.

In relation to posters why is it they are forcing there opinion on people when you oppose it but if it's something you support it's just information. We are in a democracy and both sides are entitled to put there sides forward. I do agree with people here that all posters should be banned

Boom_Bap

Skylinehead wrote: »

I want posters saying NO TO POSTERS

NO TO POSERS

I like that better. F*ck posers.

Skylinehead

deandean wrote: »

I think there should be a referendum. Let the People decide whether or not posters should be allowed on poles.

I want posters saying NO TO POSTERS

Rubberchikken

Yes its illegal. Its someones property.
If you have a problem with whatever is on a poster why not do like the majority do , just ignore it. There are posters everywhere.
Tbh, what value they have is questionable.

gmisk

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

The Yes side are in danger of alienating large parts of the undecided vote base by letting fat angry women with nose rings and short spiky hair appear on the tv and radio so they can lecture us.

Ruth Coppinger and Brid Smith should also cost them about 100k votes.

They need to be careful. Not going smoothly for them so far.

To counteract that....John Mc Guirk...what a clown....

All the polls and betting indicate a yes vote, 580k raised from small donations in a very short period of time....where are the real indicators it is not going smoothly?

Noveight

realdanbreen wrote: »

I love the way the YES camp view themselves as liberal and yet want to behave like fascists.

Couldn’t possibly be thanked enough.

Dravokivich

I can't stand the posters and I don't care about who puts them up.

But if you want to campaign with posters, you should not be able to have them close together. It creates an unmeasured representation of popular perception, which as it so happens is measured by the outcome of the vote.

I don't think they need to be censored, but as it's essentially an advertising campaign, they should adhere to the same controls we have in place regarding the accuracy and intent behind what's being advertised to us daily*.

* 95 out of 132 people polled provided a response of some sort.

Reati

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

I was going to vote yes but after seeing and hearing some of their more extreme supporters I want nothing to do with them.

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

For me I’m going to either vote YES or not vote. The YES campaign is convincing me to not vote.

A fair bit of nose spiteing face in this thread.

I was going to vote one way but someone else acts the goat so i'm going to vote a different way or not vote at all to spite it?

No wonder the country is ruled by parish pump politics if that's how you figure out how you'll vote. Don't look at the issues and actually come up with your own view on what you believe what ever you do.

JohnnyFlash

The Yes side are in danger of alienating large parts of the undecided vote base by letting fat angry women with nose rings and short spiky hair appear on the tv and radio so they can lecture us.

Ruth Coppinger and Brid Smith should also cost them about 100k votes.

They need to be careful. Not going smoothly for them so far.

kylith

Stoner wrote: »

I've seen more vote Yes signs tbh regardless 20: 1 is inaccurate imo but your ratio and text don't align. I don't think anyone should take down posters apart from the people who put them up. I think there is something undemocratic about it regardless of who does it.

I think it depends on what part of the country you're in, some are better covered than others.

Some local authorities requested that posters not be put up, which has led to total coverage in some areas by one side who have ignored the request.

utyh2ikcq9z76b

suicide_circus wrote: »

Vote No posters are micro aggressions

Triggering people and hurting feelings, what kind of society allows that, the Yes vote should just be given the vote in case anyone else gets offended.

OldMrBrennan83

This post has been deleted.

Stoner

Mrhuth wrote:

Don't litter the streets with useless sings. Who's paying for that? The ratio of yes to no vote signs is like 20 to 1. I've actually only seen vote yes sign once but vote no is on every street and there is one on every lamp post just so it doesn't get missed. You don't get to brainwash people.

I've seen more vote Yes signs tbh regardless 20: 1 is inaccurate imo but your ratio and text don't align. I don't think anyone should take down posters apart from the people who put them up. I think there is something undemocratic about it regardless of who does it.

suicide_circus

Vote No posters are micro aggressions

OldMrBrennan83

This post has been deleted.

Mrhuth

Patww79 wrote: »

Both groups of ***** are doing it. No matter what your belief is, you can't say one is doing it and not the other.

Thank Christ I can't vote so I can tell you all to get the fúck off my doorstep.

Not really, most of it is from the no side. I would say 90%