nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Is it illegal to tear down posters

Mrhuth

Like you see some bs advertising like 20 signs of brainwashed VOTE NO everywhere. Are they authorised to be put up and can I tear them down for spreading fake information? There is one thing I cannot handle and that is propaganda.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Drumpot

Why are posters allowed for any vote in this day and age? Every person knows either how to read or use some sort of medium (Tv, online etc).

Mrhuth

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

How dare you. You know nothing about me yet you accuse me of that.

I was going to vote yes.

Saw the carry on of the yes supporters.

Want nothing to do with them.

I may vote no or I may not vote at all.

Clear?

Of course I accuse you because you are a wimp and don't care about the issue at hand. You care about the campaign and not about the issue.

Mrhuth

Allinall wrote: »

Definitely voting no after this.

Keep up the good work, Poster.

Factual destruction

baylah17

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

For me I’m going to either vote YES or not vote. The YES campaign is convincing me to not vote.

Which has the effect of a No vote

Beechwoodspark

Mrhuth wrote: »

No you weren't, you were gonna vote no and just you are just bs now. You're just trying to guilt trip others in doing the same. I know that tactic.

How dare you. You know nothing about me yet you accuse me of that.

I was going to vote yes.

Saw the carry on of the yes supporters.

Want nothing to do with them.

I may vote no or I may not vote at all.

Clear?

con___manx1

c.p.w.g.w wrote: »

As long as there are not damaged, and returned to the owners I can't see any issue...The one which states 1 in 5 babies are aborted in UK is clickbait misleading...They are foetus /embryo...Not a baby

At 12 weeks they are more than a foetus and still allowed to be aborted. I seen a video of an abortion of a 12 week old in secondary school. It was quite disturbing.

baylah17

Greybottle wrote: »

Yes it is illegal to tear them down. They are somebody else's property and those who put them up have permission from the council to do so.

Not Necessarily, many posters (in General) fail to comply with the law

gandalf

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

I have made my decision. The constitution shouldn’t be a place for abortion bans. Also I am pro abortions until a limit.

However that doesn’t mean I’m voting.

If you don't vote your opinion is useless and worthless.

wexie

Mrhuth wrote: »

I wouldn't mind that much if they weren't lying. Who do I return them to? Who is paying for these posters?

Save them till next winter, if we get any snow they'll make great little toboggans

gandalf

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

Can’t blame the Russians this time.

I’m glad there’s some understanding that the US does interfere in democracies.

Never said they didn't, just Russia is more of an issue for Europe ATM. But hey that's for another thread. I wouldn't let the extremists of either side of this referendum put you off voting for what you believe is right. For me those types make me more determined to vote. Remember there are a lot of empty vessels on both sides making a living out of pushing their agendas.

Allinall

Mrhuth wrote: »

I'll post up a photograph of how many of them are in my street. I didn't count but it's at least 20 and they are on every lamp post. Who the hell is funding them? Why is it on issues like that, that they have unlimited funding. And then they go calling pro abortion activists nazis. What the ****? How many vote yes posters do you see compared to vote no? Same with gay marriage yeah because gay marriage affects your pathetic life so ****ing much that you have to prevent other people getting married. I am furious for not taking down the anti gay marriage posters. I won't make the same mistake again.

Definitely voting no after this.

Keep up the good work, Poster.

uck51js9zml2yt

c.p.w.g.w wrote: »

As long as there are not damaged, and returned to the owners I can't see any issue...The one which states 1 in 5 babies are aborted in UK is clickbait misleading...They are foetus /embryo...Not a baby

Ah yes... the let's call it an apple instead of an orange rouse...always works:)

Mrhuth

Discodog wrote: »

I suspect that you couldn't be prosecuted if you took them down but returned them to the organisation. We desperately need the referendum commission to regulate the lies - it's worse than Brexit.

I wouldn't mind that much if they weren't lying. Who do I return them to? Who is paying for these posters?

Franz Von Peppercorn

pconn062 wrote: »

You should use your own critical thinking and come up with your own analysis and conclusion on the topic, rather than relying on either campaign for which way to vote. All the information is online, never understand people not voting because they don't like the way campaigns are run.

I have made my decision. The constitution shouldn’t be a place for abortion bans. Also I am pro abortions until a limit.

However that doesn’t mean I’m voting.

Mrhuth

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

I was going to vote yes but after seeing and hearing some of their more extreme supporters I want nothing to do with them.

No you weren't, you were gonna vote no and just you are just bs now. You're just trying to guilt trip others in doing the same. I know that tactic.

Discodog

I suspect that you couldn't be prosecuted if you took them down but returned them to the organisation. We desperately need the referendum commission to regulate the lies - it's worse than Brexit.

Roadtoad

Its illegal, don't do it by day or by night.

You must allow others express their opinions, other societies have been pulled apart by not recognising this.

Franz Von Peppercorn

gandalf wrote: »

Well they have to spend that "donated" American evangelical money somehow

Can’t blame the Russians this time.

I’m glad there’s some understanding that the US does interfere in democracies.

[Deleted User]

People already have their minds made up on this issue, posters are not going to change that.

Beechwoodspark

I was going to vote yes but after seeing and hearing some of their more extreme supporters I want nothing to do with them.

pconn062

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

For me I’m going to either vote YES or not vote. The YES campaign is convincing me to not vote.

You should use your own critical thinking and come up with your own analysis and conclusion on the topic, rather than relying on either campaign for which way to vote. All the information is online, never understand people not voting because they don't like the way campaigns are run.

Mrhuth

I'll post up a photograph of how many of them are in my street. I didn't count but it's at least 20 and they are on every lamp post. Who the hell is funding them? Why is it on issues like that, that they have unlimited funding. And then they go calling pro abortion activists nazis. What the ****? How many vote yes posters do you see compared to vote no? Same with gay marriage yeah because gay marriage affects your pathetic life so ****ing much that you have to prevent other people getting married. I am furious for not taking down the anti gay marriage posters. I won't make the same mistake again.

gandalf

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

For me I’m going to either vote YES or not vote. The YES campaign is convincing me to not vote.

Really if you are serious about the issue in hand the way either campaign is conducted should not have any bearing on how you vote unless you are very fickle. There are elements in both campaigns that I find distasteful but it won't diminish my wish to vote for what I believe is right.

elfy4eva

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

For me I’m going to either vote YES or not vote. The YES campaign is convincing me to not vote.

You do not take this constitutional referendum seriously if you allow yourself and whether you vote to be influenced by outside parties. Inform yourself with the facts and let the loud ones caw as they like.

Hitman3000

Greybottle wrote:

Yes it is illegal to tear them down. They are somebody else's property and those who put them up have permission from the council to do so.

It depends on the height from the ground. If they are liable to cause an obstruction or injury it's acceptable to tear them down.

Franz Von Peppercorn

Mrhuth wrote: »

Who is forcing their views??? Who the **** puts up these signs and forces their views on others?

The NO campaign. Keep up.

Franz Von Peppercorn

For me I’m going to either vote YES or not vote. The YES campaign is convincing me to not vote.

gandalf

wexie wrote: »

Couldn't agree more, really not an idea of these times, much like the opinions expressed on them (the no posters that is)

Well they have to spend that "donated" American evangelical money somehow

Franz Von Peppercorn

VinLieger wrote: »

Hilarious considering the NO campaign are the ones trying to force their views on everyone else, think you need to go and read the definition of fascism again

Everybody is trying to force their views on everybody else. You need to look at the definition of democracy.

wexie

gandalf wrote: »

Really these days posters should just be banned, they are an eyesore and cause unnecessary litter especially cable ties left on street lamp poles.

Couldn't agree more, really not an idea of these times, much like the opinions expressed on them (the no posters that is)