Skylinehead wrote: » There's no blanket increases lads, it varies by company.
trobbin wrote: » Any body would’ve done what I did. So anyone familiar with these things? I’ve never had a previous issue with speed.
CruelCoin wrote: » If my pregnant wife were bleeding and in pain, i'd be doing a damn sight faster than "creeping over the limit"....I really don't know who wouldn't.
pickarooney wrote: » 3 points for 9km with adjustments sounds like a lot. What gets you 1 point?
mad muffin wrote: » So doing 69 in a 60 zone is the same fine and points as what I got last year doing 150 in a 120 zone on the motorway? And yes my insurance went up by €100 because of the 3 points.
Samuel T. Cogley wrote: » There's an insurance company out there that doesn't load at 8 points? There's more chance of me having a fling with January Jones.
Skylinehead wrote: » Where did I say anything about 8 points? All I'm saying is that some insurers will load at lower points than others And Christina Hendricks is better
murpho999 wrote: » You still have to drive safely. In this case I think it's better to call an ambulance that can negotiate speed , traffic and traffic lights whilst the patient is receiving medical attention. Don't see how the OP can appeal it. 69kmph in a 60kmph zone is more than "creeping" over the limit. It's 15% over.
trobbin wrote: » Was no letter with fine. I did read that allowance of 10% speed limit is given plus or minus 2km/ph that would be 60km Road 10% plus 2km is 68km. If that’s the truth, I was 1km over what’s allowed. But that’s not the point.
trobbin wrote: » You would be great to have around in an emergency. Of course I can appeal! I was asking if anyone has experience in this situation, not an opinion from someone you divides 9 by 60 gets 15 and everything in this world is black and white. Try dealing with an emergency in real life.
Vinnie222 wrote: » As I said no increase in my insurance
Greybottle wrote: » Had something similar OP. Appealed it in court. Agreed to pay €100 and got no points. Depends on the judge, though the one I got would be considered a hard enough one. Have never had points or fines before which helped. Original offence was 61 in a 50 zone in a small rural town at 2 am. Got €80 and 2 points originally.
trobbin wrote: » Thanks for that. So it’s worth going to court. Mine was 3:30pm, but on bank holiday and clear roads. Same as you, driving 18years continuously without any ever issue. I genuinely hate speeding and dangerous drivers, but emergencies are different.
Patww79 wrote: » It's not as grey as adding 10% to a speed limit and then chucking on another couple. Why not throw on 3 and you wouldn't have been speeding at all?
faceman wrote: » Was this a GATSO or a Garda ticket? If Garda I’d pop into the station first with the letter and see what they say. I’ve heard anecdotally of people having it squashed.
peckerhead wrote: » I'd just like to say +1 to both January Jones and Christina Hendricks.
trobbin wrote: » Garda. Went to station earlier, Guard said he could do nothing. He said he’d fight it, but wasn’t sure what would be outcome. He said if they had be stopped me in that situation “it’s a Garda escort to hospital doors, and the speed is a lot higher than I was going”
Samuel T. Cogley wrote: » There comes a point though where the speed will be unacceptable and a bigger danger than the emergency in the car. It's no good to anyone if you go slamming into a wall at 100KPH in a 50.
Sprinter Sacre wrote: » Are there speed vans actually out in 60 zones?