ButtersSuki wrote: » I wasn't listening....but is that an actual quote from today's show caller?
TheHomeService wrote: » Yes, caller. Just about 3 minutes before the end, if you want to listen to it on the RTE iPlayer, so to speak.
ButtersSuki wrote: » Is dat different to De RTE Real Player? And duz it wurk on De EYEPad? And from anyware in De Wurild?
zell12 wrote: » I read all about today's show. One question, did Landan Lawyer make an appearance?
SecretsOfEarth wrote: » Like de emale, it wurks 24 hours a day seven days a week so to speak, unlike Joe.
TheHomeService wrote: » A feck, I thought Fateen used to call it "De RTE EyePlayer" in an attempt to make it sound like the Beeb :-(. My bad, as ne'er dowels do be saying, of all tings!
ButtersSuki wrote: » After a few weeks of this, his tone changed to one of some sort of idoitic boastful pride and he talked about is as if RTE had invented Real Player. His stupidity knows no bounds.
Dan Jaman wrote: » I recall him mentioning "our Real Player" and "RTE's Real Player" as if it was some in-house wizardry. No doubt the world was beating a path to the doors of Montrose in the hope of getting some o' dat. Or not. I must say this, though. In all the years I've had access to it, it's hardly ever worked faultlessy, or at all on some occasions. Continally beset by niggles and glitches, and that's when the teaboy can be arsed to keep it up to date. The maintenance of the database the player draws on is hit and miss, to put it mildly. Just another symptom of how seriously RTE takes online subcribers - not at all.
ButtersSuki wrote: » Re. your last point.....only a few hundred people access the services online apparently.....was in de paper last year so to speak.
A Shaved Duck? wrote: » Whats with the pathetic voice david?...is it for effect?
Dan Jaman wrote: » I wonder how many more there would be if they hadn't been put off by the dreadful layout and reliability.
Dan Jaman wrote: » Six month's work stolen. Never heard of backups, caller?