grogi wrote: » If someone undertook you, there was more than enough room for you to change the lane.
DaveyDave wrote: » I had someone undertake me and swerve at me because I didn't move over when she put her indicator at me. I was on the N4 going onto the M50 southbound so I had to be in the right lane. She was going into the city center so needed to be in the middle lane anyway
micks_address wrote: » Often on the m50 I'll be in the right lane at 100kph overtaking for a good stretch when someone will come up behind be doing 120 plus.. I'm still overtaking cars on my left so feel obliged to get out of the way which I do when safe to do so. Lane hogging might be an issue on the m50 but so is speeding. Very few people seem to obey motorway speed limits..
Panrich wrote: » To answer the original question, it will be when we’re all being driven around by self driving cars
Dravokivich wrote: » I think that's a lot of the reason behind it on the motorways around Dublin. Not too sure beyond it because that's where most of my driving is. M50 on both ends, the 1st Lane filters off. M/N7 people try to get into the Lanes they need before Newlands whether it's inbound or outbound. It's a bit mad thinking people are prepping for the m7 outbound from that far out, but it's why they do it. Same happens on the M/N4.
Swanner wrote: » You could say the same about the difference between an accident at 40 kph and 80 kph.
grogi wrote: » In fairness - the signs above the motorway (0:30) were clear: - left lane - Exit 4 - R132 - middle & right lane - continue on M1 towards Belfast
Swanner wrote: » With modern cars and good roads there's no reason why those cars overtaking you couldn't be doing so at 150 / 160 kph perfectly safely..
Swanner wrote: » Isambard wrote: » the difference between an accident at 120 and at 160 must be quite significant. There's a reason for you You could say the same about the difference between an accident at 40 kph and 80 kph. Following your logic we might as well reduce all limits nationwide to 20 kph in case anyone ever gets hurt.
Isambard wrote: » the difference between an accident at 120 and at 160 must be quite significant. There's a reason for you
Swanner wrote: » If everyone drove correctly you'd be overtaking the cars in the middle lane and the cars going faster then you would be able to overtake you in the outer lane. With modern cars and good roads there's no reason why those cars overtaking you couldn't be doing so at 150 / 160 kph perfectly safely.. Our inability as a nation to comprehend and follow some simple rules will always prevent us from fully utilising our road network as frustration aside, over 30% of the M50's capacity is taken up by poor lane discipline.
munchkin_utd wrote: » unless the law has been recently changed, trucks are banned from ever overtaking on 2 lane Irish motorways , and the rules of the road state this :http://www.rsa.ie/Documents/Road%20Safety/Leaflets/Leaf_booklets/motorway_driving.pdf - page 7 another example of the guards not enforcing the law it seems.
Ahhhh for forks sake! wrote: » Spot on. I'd been meaning to respond to that point. You are only meant to move right when the left most lane becomes and auxiliary one. For what it's worth, she swung left and the last minute and took the same exit as me for Rush / Lusk / Donabate etc.
LIGHTNING wrote: » Keep on topic.
highdef wrote: » She was clearly in the wrong lane for at least kilometre before that first sign.... And even at that point, the road markings have not changed to indicate that the left lane was an auxiliary lane. I'd bet she was in the middle lane long before the video started.
Ahhhh for forks sake! wrote: » I was driving along the M1 Jesus, if Gardaí don't enforce the rules or don't even know them ... then what hope do we have?