verycool wrote: » My cats breath smells like cat food.
Cee-Jay-Cee wrote: » It’s probably part of the reason Subway is in decline all over the world. They think they know what people want but they haven’t a fücking breeze. I hate diet drinks with a passion, I’m not on a diet so why the fcuk would I want to drink one?
Brae100 wrote: » F%ck you Subway. If I want a drink with sugar in it, I will make that decision for myself.
Johnny Dogs wrote: » Is it really? Seems like there's a new one opening up in every street corner tbh. Imo, all the other delis and what not try to emulate them, badly. Hard to beat a good subway, meatballs, cheese few pickles and olives and the absolute icing on the cake, jalapenos. Don't scrimp on the southwest sauce either yo. :cool: As for the diet drinks, give me coke zero over ordinary coke all day every day.
testicles wrote: » This post has been deleted.
testicles wrote: » Sugar tax is the reason. They just couldn't be bothered having different prices for different drinks
Grab All Association wrote: » Yep that’s why. Tbh the sugar free drinks taste way better imho. Think of this. You’d have to drink 139 x 330ml cans of zero sugar Coca Cola to match the calories in 1 330ml can of regular Coca Cola and that’s excluding the 29g of sugar.
givyjoe wrote: » . Cant beat a burrito, that and chopped (which you can beat) are seemingly still the two massive growth foot joints.
Grab All Association wrote: » Yep that’s why. Tbh the sugar free drinks taste way better imho. Think of this. You’d have to drink 139 x 330ml cans of zero sugar Coca Cola to match the calories in 1 330ml can of regular Coca Cola and that’s excluding the 29g of sugar. Type 2 diabetes (reversible condition btw) is bankrupting the HSE. Sugar tax didn’t go far enough imho. Chocolate and fast food should be taxed too.
bluewolf wrote: » I didn't know we had a sugar tax Pepsi max is nicer anyway, never liked full sugar drinks
jaxxx wrote: » Ah the good old sugar tax.... Politicians claiming in their infinite wisdom that it's being brought in to try and tackle obesity, when in reality they don't actually give a f*ck about obesity and it's just another form of income. F*cking b*st*rds, hate them, because Lucozade now tastes like donkey pi$$!
Grab All Association wrote: » Type 2 diabetes (reversible condition btw).
Brae100 wrote: » Yes, it will be active from the first of May. A previous poster said that the Subway decision was probably based on avoiding the hassle of pricing their drinks differently. Subway have always had a single price for every drink. Will be interesting to see how McD and BK address this.
anewme wrote: » No idea what a growth foot joint is? Chopped seems to be opening up in place of Subway in a lot of spots but offering the same poor quality food with no providence. .
EPAndlee wrote: » People need to take responsibility for their own diets
JCX BXC wrote: » To be honest it's not an extreme fee, it's 10c for 330ml and 15c for 500ml. I'd imagine the smart firms who have standardized prices for drinks will simply raise the price of the meal by say 10c to cater for the cost. In essence this just probably damages the diet (****e) drinks, as people will think of the full sugar alternative as more expensive and hence desireable and want that. They could say +15c for sugar drinks but to be honest I don't see McD or BK as particularly health concious.
Johnny Dogs wrote: Hard to beat a good subway, meatballs, cheese few pickles and olives and the absolute icing on the cake, jalapenos.