FrancieBrady wrote: » I think the people who have really let the mask slip are those women at the forefront of Rape Crisis Centres north and south. Their remit is to prevent rape and to educate on the issues surrounding it. Rather than make this a conversation about personal responsibility for all young people socialising, they have climbed on to a feminist bandwagon and made it about men and male sporting organisations. A complete dereliction of their responsibilities imo.
facehugger99 wrote: » I've a better idea that will be simpler. 1. Don't act like an arsehole.
Mrsmum wrote: » You suspect incorrectly. And I also have four teenagers. See joe40's post to explain what actually happened.
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » I strongly doubt you have any regular engagement with anyone between the ages of 14 to 24 such is the shock and outrage youre affecting at behaviour. If you do, theyre masking their norms very well. BTW, I dont condone it. But i just dont condemn it whether as a display of moral indignation and outrage, or genuine outrage.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You don't think there will be drunk young girls clambering to get into nightclub VIP areas tonight? So deluded. :rolleyes:
tigger123 wrote: » Even if there are, it doesn't mean it's ok to treat them the way Paddy Jackson and his friends did.
Mrsmum wrote: » With regard to my knowledge of teenagers and my family You are just wrong but like in a lot of things you think you're right. I am well able for the cut and trust of modern life and teenagers but I also know when it steps over the line and I'm not alone in knowing that. Some day you might grow up and know too.
FrancieBrady wrote: » BBC reporter saying there that this is not really a sacking, it is a mutual agreement involving a financial settlement. A fudge to quieten the mob. And they seem to have bought it.
facehugger99 wrote: » The bitter is strong in this one.:D
FrancieBrady wrote: » Nothing bitter about it. I'm delighted they got paid to leave and let the sponsors/IRFU engage in the con that they sacked them. Joke is on you and yours facehugger.
facehugger99 wrote: » FrancieBrady wrote: » BBC reporter saying there that this is not really a sacking, it is a mutual agreement involving a financial settlement. A fudge to quieten the mob. And they seem to have bought it. The bitter is strong in this one.:D
meeeeh wrote: » And what is wrong with that. Are you saying they are asking for it. And btw what is your obsession with VIP areas, should only men be allowed into them?
ArthurDayne wrote: » Mrsmum wrote: » With regard to my knowledge of teenagers and my family You are just wrong but like in a lot of things you think you're right. I am well able for the cut and trust of modern life and teenagers but I also know when it steps over the line and I'm not alone in knowing that. Some day you might grow up and know too. MrsMum, seeing as Facehugger doesn't appear too willing to explore the theme further -- perhaps I might ask if you would be willing to answer on the below hypothesis. Would you be supportive of the following National Programme being implemented? 1. All citizens of the State shall submit their phones and other electronic devices to the nearest Garda station; 2. All devices will be screened along a rubric created by a panel of experts on public morality and decency. All social media companies will be legally ordered to store messages which are deleted so that they can be retrieved.; 3. Screening will include ALL private correspondence, including with family, spouses and friends. 4. All those who are found to have used terms or language in private conversation that can be deemed offensive to the public or a section of the public shall be automatically liable for expulsion from their jobs. In one fell swoop -- all those who have used degrading and offensive language will be cast out of their jobs. Only the morally righteous shall remain and the workplaces of Ireland shall be purified. The battle to embed political correctness and moral perfection in private conversations will have been won. Would you support this program?
ArthurDayne wrote: » Would you support this program?
sugarman wrote: » Isn't that pretty much the case in all professional sporting contracts? They'd legally be entitled to see out their contracts or come to a settlement . They can only ever terminate a players contract if it's in breach of club rules.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Yes, but the IRFU are clearly trying to give the impression that they sacked them. ('Revoked their contracts') Seems they didn't, they negotiated an early end to their contracts. Entirely different thing.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Ah the indignant feminist rant. Never imply that your own personal responsibility is part of the reason you may end up in potentially dangerous situations because that is anti women something something. :rolleyes:.
Mrsmum wrote: » Love the way you put the top age AT 24 there just to cover the stupid behaviour of PJ.
facehugger99 wrote: » Jesus man - why don't you knock the mansplaining ****e off? - it's boring to to keep spamming the thread with your repetitious waffle.
ArthurDayne wrote: » MrsMum, seeing as Facehugger doesn't appear too willing to explore the theme further -- perhaps I might ask if you would be willing to answer on the below hypothesis. Would you be supportive of the following National Programme being implemented? 1. All citizens of the State shall submit their phones and other electronic devices to the nearest Garda station; 2. All devices will be screened along a rubric created by a panel of experts on public morality and decency. All social media companies will be legally ordered to store messages which are deleted so that they can be retrieved.; 3. Screening will include ALL private correspondence, including with family, spouses and friends. 4. All those who are found to have used terms or language in private conversation that can be deemed offensive to the public or a section of the public shall be automatically liable for expulsion from their jobs. In one fell swoop -- all those who have used degrading and offensive language will be cast out of their jobs. Only the morally righteous shall remain and the workplaces of Ireland shall b.ction in private conversations will have been won. Would you support this program?
facehugger99 wrote: » What joke is that Francie lad?
wexie wrote: Oh look at that....they've been sackedhttp://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-43766959 facehugger wrote: Hardly surprising.Great news all the same.
wexie wrote: Oh look at that....they've been sackedhttp://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-43766959
facehugger wrote: Hardly surprising.Great news all the same.
meeeeh wrote: » I still don't get you, women should not go into VIP areas or should not drink because they would potentially get raped?
FrancieBrady wrote: » The joke is that you are delighted they were sacked.https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=106723513&postcount=820 The fact is they weren't. They negotiated a financial reward to end their contracts early.
