tretorn wrote: » Piss off is a very rude term to use, I feel offended, where are the thought police, I want someone to pay because I feel offended.
tritium wrote: » Oh for ****s sake. Of all the disreputable, dishonest slants we’ve seen put on how this case transpired that on really takes the biscuit Care to acknowledge why there had to be four barristers? Care to acknowledge who made to decision to carry out four trials together? Setting a new low there. Utterly pathetic post
Silentcorner wrote: » Oh for f##ks sake, I know full well why there was four barristers. That fact remains it was unprecedented. I know full well who made the decision to carry out the four trials together. But there are some right nutters who think this case shouldn't have gone to court who'd want to take a look at themselves. By doing that, you are inferring that this young woman either fooled them all, and by all I mean, the Rape Crisis Centre, The PSNI, The Crown Prosecutors office, who collectively managed to get this case all the way to the jury, despite the best efforts of the defense team. Otherwise, start a thread in the conspiracy forum because that is where that nonsense belongs!
opinionated3 wrote: » So they were found not guilty in the eyes of the law, but still lose their jobs/livelihoods because of social media? Mob rule at it's worst IMO
Faugheen wrote: » Press Association saying both Jackson and Olding are gone. So many people in this thread are going to be fuming. However, lets remember it's their actions that caused this and not the actions of Twitter.
Faugheen wrote: » Nah, they lost their jobs because of their actions that night.
mfceiling wrote: » Faugheen wrote: » Nah, they lost their jobs because of their actions that night. No. Their actions were deemed ok by judge and jury. It was their private messages which became public that did them in.
Faugheen wrote: » I'm not talking about rape. I'm talking about them causing a woman to leave their company in hysterics and bleeding, and then the following WhatsApp messages. Regardless of the verdict, all of the above has been acknowledged by Olding and Jackson.
mfceiling wrote: » No. Their actions were deemed ok by judge and jury. It was their private messages which became public that did them in.
blackrock29 wrote: » So hang on employment law is pretty clear cut here. What part of there contract relates to private messages not representing the IRFU ? They either got a huge payout. Or they have been illegally dismissed ?
blackrock29 wrote: » So the only people to learn anything is the sponsors and the Twitter crowed.
Augeo wrote: » Their statements of regret whether genuine or not spoke volumes about their conduct.....if you regret your actions it's not unusual for others to find them unacceptable Bon voyage top sh@ggers
FrancieBrady wrote: » I said it all along, the sponsors would go with the loudest noise. Hard to silence the puritans. At least their hypocrisy was exposed on here.
NAGDEFI wrote: » Francie you've been living in denial for weeks. This would happen in most rugby playing countries. Calling people puritanical etc is pointless. You've invested more energy on this thread than any other poster and it was as plain as the nose on our face what was going to happen. You can't make a world of your own.
FrancieBrady wrote: I said it all along, the sponsors would go with the loudest noise.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Yep, tell the children of Ireland...do something you regret and loose everything and face tacit deportation. We've come a long way.
Augeo wrote: » I reckon it's the ole not guilty = maybe not actually innocent thing TBH
NAGDEFI wrote: » But this crack of blaming Ireland and it's 'mobs', feminazi, twitterati.. As i said above most rugby playing countries wouldn't allow those fellas play for them. You're in denial about mobs, twitterati, feminazis. It's just ordinary public opinion. No organised 5th columns. You've been blaming these groups in your head when they are actually the people you deal with in your daily life, be they family, neighbours etc. Ireland of 2018, or most western countries isn't ready to have 'top shaggers' on the national team. Ireland as a whole, that's the size of it, no conspiracies. It's not Vegas here or in most countries. We're ahead of the liberal curve in many respects, with Same Sex Marriage for example.
Deleted User wrote: » Ah thank god that beacon of morality Bank of Ireland have come along to save the day. :rolleyes:
FrancieBrady wrote: » Ireland's hypocritical moral indignation about sex comes from somewhere. Personally I think most of this came from a latent strain of RC hangups. 'We know it goes on, we partake in it ourselves maybe, but do not get caught doing it, because we need to feel morally superior and righteous. Add in the feminazis with the 'a girl can withdraw consent the morning after if she wants to' and the defendants didn't have a chance. They were gone from day one.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w3.vanillicon.com/v2/33ff51e6843dec62476295b286496533.svg)
