Mumha wrote: » Where do you begin to absorb today ? The biggest question is whether there are any/some Republicans with even the merest modicum of decency, integrity and patriotism, left ? Fianna Fail are in the ha'penny place when it comes to a lack of ethics compared to the "Party of Lincoln"
Hurrache wrote: » He's pretty much flagging that anyone willing to lie for him or obstruct justice on his behalf, in order to keep Trump from trouble, will be looked after by him so go ahead and perjur themselves.
2 Scoops wrote: » Say it ain't so! Laws for thee but not for me.http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/383080-watchdog-fired-fbi-official-mccabe-leaked-to-media-to-help-himself The Department of Justice’s inspector general concluded that fired FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe made a leak to the media “designed to advance his personal interests at the expense of Department leadership,” according to a copy of the report obtained by The Hill. The report from IG Michael Horowitz makes the case that McCabe authorized disclosures to the media that were designed to combat the perception that he had a conflict of interest in overseeing dual FBI investigations related to former secretary of State Hillary Clinton. “We concluded that McCabe’s decision to confirm the existence of the [Clinton Foundation] Investigation through an anonymously sourced quote, recounting the content of a phone call with a senior Department official in a manner designed to advance his personal interests at the expense of Department leadership, was clearly not within the public interest exception,” Horowitz wrote.
everlast75 wrote: » He has officially lost it....https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/984877999718895616?s=19
mcmoustache wrote: » Why do you keep closing and opening new accounts?
2 Scoops wrote: » Stalkers
mcmoustache wrote: » Fair enough. Do you still think that the Russia investigation is a hoax concocted by the sore loser democrats?
Water John wrote: » Well, if Trump is pitching this, as a character battle between Comey and himself, I think we all know the winner and loser.
2 Scoops wrote: » Collusion aspect yes. I wouldn't trust Comey as far as I could throw him either.https://twitter.com/Comey/status/958145125120663553
aloyisious wrote: » So can he be sued in civil court for naming McCabe and Comey as thieves?
2 Scoops wrote: » Watch this video from from 6 minutes on and tell me James Comey has any credibility. Comey's FBI came to the conclusion that all of Clinton's aides had no idea there was a secret server even though through FOAI state department releases and subsequent leaks emails showed her aides talking about how to hide the server and Clinton foundation donations from prosecutors. The fact is he let Clinton walk and drafted an exoneration letter months in advance of even interviewing Clinton and key witnesses. None of that means Trump is innocent of wrongdoing, the problem is the FBI at the top, Comey, McCabe and whoever else were not playing straight and the dog on the street knows that. Now prosecutors are looking at everything and anything Trump related with a fine comb and some of that will inevitably stick and eventually in all probability bring him down. I'M FINE WITH THAT - what I'm not fine with certain people being above the law and those who want Trump nailed gleefully ignoring the obvious double standards.
Leroy42 wrote: » On what basis, from this remove, can you claim to trust any of them? Why would you distrust Comey yet trust Sessions for example? Why would you trust Comey over Trump? It seems rather odd to choose a side when you can't possibly know the finer details. I'm not saying you need to trust Comey, but to continue to back Trump despite all the evidence seems extreme
Mumha wrote: » Using Jason Chaffetz as a crutch is laughable. Where's Chaffetz now ? Oh yes he had to resign in a hurry. Chaffetz is down there will there with Gowdy and Nunes, the 3 Stooges.
2 Scoops wrote: » Yes yes, attack the person, in this case Chaffetz and not the obvious point I was making. Continue praising your god James Comey who apparently can do no wrong.
mcmoustache wrote: » What if there were emails by campaign members looking for Hillary dirt from Russians and a campaign chairman with very strong ties to Russia already indicted? When you were calling this a hoax, we didn't know what was going to come out. A lot has changed since then. We know about Stone and wikileaks, Manafort and FSB, Papadololous, Trump's knowledge of the Trump tower meeting and Bannon's opinions of it, Cohen's dealings in Russia etc, etc and that's only a small amount of what we know. It'll be interesting to hear what Gates and Papadopolous have to say. I look forward to the next account name you pick.
Leroy42 wrote: » 2 scoops, you seem to continually agree that there is plenty of shandy things about Trump. Yet he seem to then ignore that and seem to suggest that despite your belief of what he may have done, that he is fine to be POTUS. Many people, myself included, feel that the leaders that we elect should strive to more than that. POTUS, PM etc are basically the person that society feels best represents them. I think we should all put higher levels for those positions.
2 Scoops wrote: » When people gleefully ignore a pay for play scheme in the state department and then turn into warriors of ethics and accountability just because it's Trump I will call out that hypocrisy every time. They continue to this day ignoring it whilst lambasting any who dares to point out the double standards or question the intent of the FBI. Comey and McCabe are as crooked as they come and nothing will convince me otherwise.https://apnews.com/82df550e1ec646098b434f7d5771f625 "WASHINGTON (AP) — More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation. It’s an extraordinary proportion indicating her possible ethics challenges if elected president."
everlast75 wrote: » But... as is always the case with DJT supporters, they only cry foul when it means they get the benefit.
