Deleted User wrote: » or I could delete the DPF, which I'm told is much more reasonable
unkel wrote: » Go on so. Delete the DPF. They are a failed technology anyway. Pretty reasonable to delete it as it seems to cause trouble and they are expensive to fix. The only reason the DPF is there in the first place is to stop carcinogenic particulate matter coming out of your exhaust. Sure who cares if another few people get cancer because of diesels in this country?
unkel wrote: » .........The generation of our children and grand children will ask our generation and the one before us serious questions about why we encouraged Ireland into having the highest percentage of diesel cars in the world. How the hell did we let this happen?...........
josip wrote: » Sell it. The DPF won't be the end of it.
dieselbug wrote: » Imagine buying it!! Who would buy it if they knew it's history.
Black_Knight wrote: » Deleted User
CIP4 wrote: » @KKV you would surely notice if your car was doing constant dpf regens meaning everytime you switch it off you’d hear the fan running on for a few minutes to cool it down as well as the fact you’d smell it when you get out of the car.
[Deleted User] wrote: » last night i went to Tesco and seen a Nissan Pathfinder, which I duly parked beside and admired. Always thought they were a gorgeous jeep and one of the nicest cars on the road in general.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Fan would often be still running when I get out of the car. Never noticed a smell though. Keep in mind that although I do potter around the town here and there, most of my driving is diesel-intended driving. I've often drove the car for over 12 hours straight, 7 days in a row, mingling between towns, N roads, Motorway and everything in between. So the diesel engine does get treated like it is in an articulated truck at times (constantly on the go). So I presumed the fan staying on was to cool the engine bay after a long day of driving. I'd say the car should be okay after this to be honest. I'll still have my engine warranty, should I need it. to be honest, if I get another 3-4 years out of the car i'd be happy as larry. Mildly related, but I did laugh to myself: last night i went to Tesco and seen a Nissan Pathfinder, which I duly parked beside and admired. Always thought they were a gorgeous jeep and one of the nicest cars on the road in general. I nearly had one bought before I opted for the C5, But I decided against it... because I heard they had known engine issues, and i didn't want to have the hassle or expense of that happening to me Funny how things go.
colm_mcm wrote: » Can we set up a gofundme page for KKV. A gallon of petrol should do it.
bear1 wrote: » Is anyone else waiting for engine number 3 and the op saying it's worth it cause it's a comfortable cruiser?
ectoraige wrote: » bear1 wrote: » Is anyone else waiting for engine number 3 and the op saying it's worth it cause it's a comfortable cruiser? If it's not costing him extra, sure what of it?
Gravelly wrote: » There’s a thing called inconvenience cost.