Iused2likebusts wrote: » CSF wrote: » Do the Anfield Express have leaked teams every week? Can’t help but feel those being accurate would be invaluable over the next 2 gameweeks. Most weeks. I'll post it here if I get it. Some weeks its in the Liverpool thread aswell.
CSF wrote: » Do the Anfield Express have leaked teams every week? Can’t help but feel those being accurate would be invaluable over the next 2 gameweeks.
manual_man wrote: » TYpical FA bias. Let's just move on
manual_man wrote: TYpical FA bias. Let's just move on
km79 wrote: » manual_man wrote: » TYpical FA bias. Let's just move on “They took his testimony into account “ apparently Ridiculous decision tbh No new video evidence since they reviewed first So as I said at the time they really should have made sure they had enough video evidence to prove he DIDNT touch it before taking it away once it was awarded to him . Now they are suddenly seeing a touch they couldn’t see Saturday ? Ridiculous and very annoying from a FF POV I wonder will bookies pay out if people backed him ......
Suarezistheman wrote: » Whether he touched it or not is irrelevant now. He has been officially awarded a premier league goal yet we don't get points in FPL. Ridiculous
2nd Row Donkey wrote: » The dubious goal panel are a dubious bunch.
CSF wrote: » That much is certain now. If we can’t see you score a goal, but you say you scored it, it’s yours now?
Benimar wrote: » If you have a daughter whose life depends on it, yes
Benimar wrote: » CSF wrote: » That much is certain now. If we can’t see you score a goal, but you say you scored it, it’s yours now? If you have a daughter whose life depends on it, yes
CSF wrote: » The whole thing makes Kane look a tiny bit petty. Imagine the Twitter furore if Balotelli was out swearing on his family’s life that he scored a goal that other people had logically concluded he hadn’t touched.
the whole year inn wrote: » CSF wrote: » The whole thing makes Kane look a tiny bit petty. Imagine the Twitter furore if Balotelli was out swearing on his family’s life that he scored a goal that other people had logically concluded he hadn’t touched. He wants to leave and wants Real so another goalden boot will help that.
alchemist33 wrote: » More importantly we know Harry will be motivated for a GW37 TC, regardless of league position.
CSF wrote: » I have no idea whether that first part is true, but having a tantrum over your teammate being awarded a goal is serious bedwetter stuff. Just a week before you had Aubameyang letting his mate who hadn’t score in a while take a penalty, while he’s on a hattrick. Some difference in mentality.
CSF wrote: » I don’t think your logic here is right, the goal was marked as TBC pretty much immediately. This isn’t a criminal case so it’s not a thing where you have to find indisputable proof that he didn’t touch it. If you check it in detail and don’t see him touching it you don’t give the goal. The FA have decided to give the England number 1 striker a goal, that there is pretty much no evidence he scored, and if I was Salah and I cared at all about that golden boot (he might not) id be mighty pissed off about that.