work wrote: » but the issue is a proven poisonous group having such control and freedom to brainwash our next generation.....this needs to change
Geuze wrote: » This "brainwashing" isn't very effective, is it?falling mass attendance sex before marriage is common widespread co-habitation before marriage use of contraception 35% babies born outside marriage Anybody who thinks the Catholic church has "a grip or control" over society is utterly naive.
work wrote: » I fully accept and support your right to welcome the pope however I really do not want a knee jerk reaction. I want Christian indoctrination out of our society along with its pathologic ideals.
work wrote: » I believe a huge protest against the popes visit is required to show the government and church they are no longer welcome or wanted in our society. What do you think? There are many stakeholders that should protest their removal from any influence in our society. Some that come to mind are: 1) Anyone not supportive of misogyny 2) Anyone that doesn't believe in school indoctrination of children in a massive lie. 3) Anyone concerned about abusers in positions allowing abuse 4) Anyone with the most basic scientific education. 5) Anyone that doesn't support cults 6) Anyone that believes LGBT people should be treated fairly in society. 7) Anyone that believes women should have ANY control of their bodies. 8) Anyone that is not seen as equal in the church namely women children and men. There are many other areas but I realised I have covered everyone. As such let's all go to the Phoenix park to let the Vatican know they are not welcome. Are there any peaceful groups planning to protest?
Cookie_Monster wrote: » its not against freedom of either, its against the obvious undue influence the catholic church in particular holds in Irish society. The organisation has been shown time and time again to be utterly despicable and its leader should be held to account. Unfortunately the state will never seek to hold them to account so protest is the only avenue left.
captbarnacles wrote: » I'd like to hear the Pope address some of the past of the Church maybe even take a visit to Tuam. Actually given who he is wouldn't surprise me if he did just that.
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » I'm not entirely convicned you're being sincere here, but in the event you are, - yeah, let's protest against freedom of expression and freedom of religion. That'll show the rest of the world how modern and toletant we are...
work wrote: » I don't believe there is much support for Christianity in comparison to the fanatical support they had 50 years ago. I think people are just not sure what to do without religion as it has been inground into their life through.....weddings and other events etc. If you were raised as a Muslim/jew/hindu would you support Christianity....of course not...therin lies the reason for change to stop following and promoting the lie.
Graces7 wrote: » And also of course the Gardia and others will be well prepared for protests and wil deal with them. swiftly and efficiently
CruelCoin wrote: » If we judge other nations for tolerance and modernity based on their attitude towards protesters, whats the issue here? Free to march, free to counter march. It's only tolerance and openness if ALL views are permitted. The alternative is liberal facism. "My correct view, or **** you, you don't get an opinion".
Identify the convener The convener is the person who is officially in charge of a gathering, and who is responsible for asking permission from the local authority. They are the contact person for your organisation.
A deputy convener must also be appointed, to replace the convener when necessary
Sam Quentin wrote: » There is no place in our beautiful Christian Catholic Country for this drivel...
RWCNT wrote: » What do you mean? Is protesting illegal now?
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » They have a grip insofar as they are legally allowed to discriminate with regards to entry to State-funded primary schools - THAT needs to change - but again, this is not what the OP or anyone else wants to protest. If it was, they would have portested a long time ago.
Rivka Flat Handgun wrote: » Will you also protest at the governments and civil authorities collusion in self same child abuse cases?
Sam Quentin wrote: » Your sick.
work wrote: » corks finest wrote: » Obviously you're looking for a knee jerk reaction,here's mine,and really don't care what ppl think,I my family,and most sensible, Christians welcome the holy father,us a man of peace and reconciliation,end of I fully accept and support your right to welcome the pope however I really do not want a knee jerk reaction. I want Christian indoctrination out of our society along with its pathologic ideals. To this end I am trying to gather support to protest the "holy fathers" coming to Ireland so the political establishment understand how change is not only needed but should be implemented.
corks finest wrote: » Obviously you're looking for a knee jerk reaction,here's mine,and really don't care what ppl think,I my family,and most sensible, Christians welcome the holy father,us a man of peace and reconciliation,end of
GreeBo wrote: » His sick what? Granny? Went to Lourdes, she's grand now.
work wrote: » That would be the most important thing to change (state funded school influence) I believe and in fairness in my OP that may not have been evident. I have no personal need to protest but the church have been involved in some very nasty episodes in this country and perhaps a PEACEFUL protest toward their leader (the one that exists) is merited. I really wanted to just get an idea what people thought about a protest and certainly not to lead one. Without access to the schools most children would not be aware of the church and its teachings. A class on being civic minded, ethical and an understanding of all major religions to help how countries developed should be what children are exposed to.