CalRobert wrote: » Good luck! It's pretty sad when a country's people have to emigrate in bad times AND good times. FG might as well mean 0 ****s Given.
Shedite27 wrote: » The poster said he's choosing to move because he thinks it's a better lifestyle. Nothing forcing him to move. People have always left Ireland (and other countries) through good and bad, it's nothing new.
Cyrus wrote: » whats the better lifestyle in germany and what industry is this in? Genuinely curious
Assetbacked wrote: » I have a German girlfriend so she would be happier living there for one! For me, the lifestyle benefits include; Thermal spas/saunas are popular, sports halls where it is possible to pay and use gyms, pools, badminton halls etc, open attitude to sex so swinger clubs are common, German food and beer is incredible (obviously not particularly healthy though!) and not expensive to go out, skiing in winter (having the Alps in the country, not just for skiing), actually having seasons like hot summers and snowy winters; being based on continental Europe so easy access to other European countries, there is a stable and more affordable rental situation, football is the main sport, transport systems and infrastructure is efficient and so reliable, there is so much culture within Germany (Oktoberfest, Christmas markets, white asparagus season, carnival, May festival etc), incredible and extremely safe cities and towns, relaxed attitude in the South, inexpensive supermarkets and the people are fantastic (beautiful women, great sense of humour and very friendly and down to earth). All of the above makes up the lifestyle benefit for me. I work in law in Ireland but am happy to go to Germany and not initially work in law just to experience Germany, which may mean taking a job on half my current salary but, as I’ve said, even if I did that, financially myself and my girlfriend would not be much worse off than we are currently in Dublin.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » Hmm. My brother lives in Germany and he would agree with only some of that. Far away fields. Let’s see what you think in a few years there.
utmbuilder wrote: » Outside Dublin I believe has peaked with second hand homes under serious pressure now to hold the their prices due to new builds coming online every 4 months, 50 coming online from each development at a time The amount of zoning given out in places like navan for 1000s of homes are going to make it extremely hard for second hand property's to compete against new builds a rated with fittings , even solar as standard New building regs seem to be bringing good standards
Bargain_Hound wrote: » https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/in-pictures-desperate-househunters-queue-outside-new-dublin-development-days-ahead-of-sale-36792964.html Nothing new to see here...
Eric Cartman wrote: » for f*ck sake.... this tells me its the exact wrong time to buy a house , we're at 'that' part of the cycle again, end 2019 and we're going to have a load of half finished estates and the bubble will burst again.
MayoSalmon wrote: » Supply Bubble?? aka 80,000 houses to get built next year as there is no credit bubble to burst this time round.
donkeyoaty0099 wrote: » No chance of this amount being built. My conspiracy theory hat would say that developers are deliberately building slowly so the market won't get flooded with a heap of houses at once. It suits them grand to build at a sedate pace.
Zenify wrote: » Just got a call from my mortgage broker that banks are going to pull a lot of exemptions. Reduce the amount of new ones and even retract some already given that have not drawn down. I have an exemption and that's why he was telling me. This could be a ploy to encourage me to buy asap so he gets his commission but he said I would see in in the news over the next few days. It could also be a sign that business is slowing down and he needs to make money. What are people's thoughts?
Cyrus wrote: » no its relatively affordable houses that are brand new, makes sense instead of over paying for an old house that will need 100-150k spent on it to get it to the same size and energy efficiency
donkeyoaty0099 wrote: » My conspiracy theory hat would say that developers are deliberately building slowly so the market won't get flooded with a heap of houses at once. It suits them grand to build at a sedate pace.
Colonel Claptrap wrote: » Think about what you are suggesting. Let's say you and I sell iPhones to the Irish public. We have the market sewn up, no competition. If somebody wants to buy an iPhone they have to go through us. We get together and decide to control the price by restricting supply. Only 100 iPhones can be bought this year, 50 from you and 50 for me. We charge 10k for a phone and people are queuing up for days to get them. We're making crazy money and there are thousands of people, ready and waiting with cash to buy one. But, why don't I sell a few more? You won't know. And even if you did, you can't sue me because what we're doing is illegal. You have to trust me and I have to trust you. But there's nothing stopping either of us from selling a few more. Or hundreds more. Or fulfilling demand entirely. Now imagine there are dozens, or even hundreds of other businesses who can sell iphones to the masses. We'd all have to trust each other. Anyone who wanted to sell phones would have to be part of our cartel. If 1 guy wanted to sell unlimited iphones he could make a killing and there's absolutely nothing we could do to stop him. This 'restriction of supply' notion has been thrown around here a few times. It makes no sense when demand is this frothy.
6541 wrote: » That saying when everyone is buying into stock market then walk away. All the papers have glossy house supplements. Everyone is talking about property. I would say this can't go on.
Bargain_Hound wrote: » If true, I wonder what would happen in my case as I have been granted an exemption on a new build, signed, paid deposit & waiting to complete - are they going to retract?