beechwood55 wrote: » That was in 2013. And that was because people were superstitious about having a car with 13 as part of the registration. So 131 and 132 came about....
dxhound2005 wrote: The good news in recent years is that there is much less debt in the country, and we are also very good at saving money.
erica74 wrote: I have heard ads encouraging people to take out loans for holidays, college, new cars, home improvements etc. I think this is encouraging very irresponsible borrowing and is very irresponsible lending. Many many people have shown a poor attitude to repaying money, you'd think lending institutions would have learned this lesson.
Summer In the City wrote: » People can spend their money as they wish but for me taking a loan has to be for a necessity. I drive cars that I can afford to pay cash for, my wedding cost less than 3k, I have no debt whatsoever and I never have. I will take a mortgage when the time is right but any other loan would have to be for a serious emergency.
meeeeh wrote: » Sensible car loan is perfectly fine if you can service it. I'm not in favour of buying a new car every couple of years but an old car can be more expensive to maintain, insure and less safe to drive. There is no point patting yourself on the back because you are not paying a loan if you suddenly end up with 5k repair cost for an old banger.
LirW wrote: » Housing is a quite unavoidable debt if you want to own or like here in Ireland the rental market is so dysfunctional. There's also the very conservative picture still that renting is for the young and students and many still don't see it as a long-term option (if the rental market would allow it). We're spending approx. 3,5k on our day, that's what we can afford, want afford and are comfortable with. I couldn't justify a big loan for it. It's still a huge amount of money! We recently did our house up, it badly needed essential work and it was scary how easily we had access to a lot of money.
waffleman wrote: » Wow I thought I was doing well getting my wedding down to under 10k. And that was with a cake from tesco (3 plain bases then decorated) and a gift of 200 bottles of wine from a family friend who owns a bar and lots of other cost cutting. We were determined not to take any loans. I also pay cash for cars. Last one I bought was 4,200 euro and is running great. Only debt we have is our home but we are half way through the mortgage (10 years in and its a tracker) and repayments are manageable compared to others my age. I will probably just annoy myself asking this but I need to know - how did you get your wedding costs down to 3k?
Hector Savage wrote: » Sure everyone is rich again in Ireland why would they need a loan ?? Take my mams neighbour , im genuinely curious, they have 3 kids, the woman doesn't work - and the husband is a book supplier .... They have 2 brand new land rovers (the sport version - think they are 80k each) the house they just got is 700k, plus they are doing lots of renovations .... massive extensions etc (must be at least 50k) Help me understand the finances here .... I mean "book supplier" ... in the age of amazon etc ... Maybe he's Jeff Bozos ... Then again maybe I should mind my ****ing business and not be a begruding c*nt!
eeguy wrote: » It's a silly system to encourage people to buy new cars just to "keep the years up". The county letters always confused me too. Why is it important to know that a car was registered in Meath or Carlow? Should be like the french system. Start at AA-001-AA and work up from there.
LirW wrote: » Is it now the expected norm that couples are supposed to put themselves into debt for a wedding?
Appledreams15 wrote: » Why not move abroad? I have no idea why anyone would buy in Dublin. Overpriced, under regulated. Saddled with debt your whole life.
marvin80 wrote: » I think big weddings are ridiculous, complete waste of money, especially if you're getting a loan out for it. People spending 30k+ on a piss-up - insane, and then expecting guests to cough-up gifts of cash to cover it - fu*k off!!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RmRQ_F41-o
valoren wrote: » There is a reason why 'Personal Finance' is not a core school subject.
Pinch Flat wrote: » People are financial illiterate here. They’ll all be on cribbing to Joe Duffy after the next crash telling him how the banks forced them to take out the loans for the car / holiday apartment / overpriced house or whatever.
Ubbquittious wrote: » That's easily avoidable by switching off Joe but what's worse is we'll have that bollix Noonan sending the revenue dogs out after us all to pay an extra few grand a year so he can pay back the well-deserving megacorps who lent out the money to these peeps
LirW wrote: » And unfortunately financial decency can't be passed down in families when you're holidaying with loans or buy that PlayStation for Christmas on a finance plan.
suicide_circus wrote: » Nail on head. Let's stop blaming the state for not teaching basic common sense and basically everyone else for our own stupidity. I would never in a million years take a loan to buy a car, probably because my parents never did it. They kept old cars going as long as they could and scrimped and saved to buy a second hand replacement in cash when necessary. They live according to their means and didn't give two sh*ts about keeping up with the neighbours.
Wanderer78 wrote: » and where does the ethics of our financial system come into this, are they free from blame here, our educational system teaches us a Utopian view of what part our financial system plays in our economies, and the understanding of the workings of these financial institutions is largely untrue
suicide_circus wrote: » I would never in a million years take a loan to buy a car, probably because my parents never did it.