Dades wrote: » Comprehensive crypto tax thread this way. Can this thread please be interesting again?
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » Anyone following the story from Poland of at least €270m seized from a bank account and shell company linked to Bitfinex? It seems to be money laundered for Colombian drug cartels? Very strange story. Don't know what to believe... Anyone able to make sense of it?https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/8ad509/polish_authorities_has_seized_almost_400_mln_eur/
JohnnyFlash wrote: » The Bitfinexed reddit account has deleted all their comments, and hasn’t tweeted in 3 days. Linked? The plot thickens around bitfinex and Tether…
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » Maybe tether is actually backed 1:1 with USD. It just happens to be dirty Colombian drug money in a ginormous money laundering operation??
Whelo79 wrote: » Oh look, here comes Paddy and Johnny hand in hand as usual to compliment each others posts!
JohnnyFlash wrote: » I’m perfectly entitled to post here, so put me on ignore if what I’m saying is so objectionable to you. The biggest bitcoin exchange is reported to be associated with South American drug gang money laundering operations, and no one wants to talk about it. Same thing over on r/cryptocurrency. Everything gets labelled as FUD, and any dissenting voices are dismissed as trolls and ‘salty nocoiners’. This has the potential to be a huge story, and is worthy of discussion. I’ve been taking up the DYOR mantra, and believe Bitfinex/Tether are a criminal organisation manipulating the price of cryptocurrency so they can liquidate positions, and cash out to fiat for their shady clients.
Autochange wrote: » Is there an option to delete a thread you started?
Autochange wrote: » Im willing to listen. Can you link us some sites which helped you come to this conclusion
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » https://www.google.ie/amp/s/cointelegraph.com/news/unconfirmed-polish-prosecutors-seize-400-mln-amid-allegations-bitfinex-is-implicated-in-fraud/amp
Autochange wrote: » That crowd is like taking your world news from reading the Sun
KilOit wrote: » 2 very odd individuals, they both seem to have a personal vendetta against Crypto. Don't get me wrong, i read negative news on Crypto at times and it's healthy to take the good and the bad but these 2 posters are different breed. They don't seem to have known about Crypto since before the huge bull run at Dec/Jan so either they bought high and sold low and are out of Crypto for good and want to take out their anger at the community still invested or they are just annoyed they missed out a year ago when everything was still cheap. Any twitter posts or other links they put up are people or organizations that only talk negative about Crypto and are generally from a background that stands to lose big time if Crypto takes off in a meaningful way like banks and financial institutions.
smacl wrote: » Interesting article here which suggests that if you're self-assessing you can consolidate profits and losses for crypto-currency over a year, even as an individual. If you have made an investment in Bitcoin which resulted in a loss, and in the same year, made a separate investment in Etherum which resulted in a gain, you can use your loss from the Bitcoin to offset the gain you made from Etherum. Losses can also be used against capital gain made in later years. No idea how accurate this article is, but it would seem to disagree strongly with points made by some previous posters on this thread.
If you have made an investment in Bitcoin which resulted in a loss, and in the same year, made a separate investment in Etherum which resulted in a gain, you can use your loss from the Bitcoin to offset the gain you made from Etherum. Losses can also be used against capital gain made in later years.
smacl wrote: » I think it is worth taking a slightly longer term view of what is happening in the crypto marketplace. I've been looking at ETH/EUR here as it is a pair that I happen to use, but the graphs for BTC, LTC and ETH against USD are broadly similar. What I see is slow steady growth on a low base line with a number bumps sitting on that base line. It doesn't look like much to worry about from where I'm sitting, even though my mid December buy-in does have me currently looking at a loss. There is no reason to assume that there won't be further regular bumps along the way. Still planning on investing further over the coming months. FWIW, I'm looking to invest further on the basis of the slope of the base line, so plan to see if that slope holds for the next couple of months and then buy back in if it does.
dickface wrote: » So slow steady growth because you decided to draw a straight line through several bottoms hit in the past year, that dictates where you put your money? Some further comedy in this twitter post: https://twitter.com/squawkfox/status/982618809612763136
lifeandtimes wrote: » The sarcasm isnt warranted The image and information is factually correct and is pretty much how most business predict their next quarterly/yearly earnings based in previous information so maybe next time have a bit more of a positive input than a negative and not even funny put down Also your name is pretty accurate
lifeandtimes wrote: » Couldn't agree more. All input, positive and negative is appreciated but these 2/1 are just out for the death of crypto and want everyone to get out too. I'd be more inclined to listen to them if they/he ever said anything positive about it other than the blockchain is a good idea but all I hear is "magic beans this" and "tether That" so it's just comes across as white noise now.
dickface wrote: » ooh i forgot that is how businesses predict their quarters, a single graph with price on one axis and date on another. Yep they don't predict it using any other information.
dickface wrote: » So slow steady growth because you decided to draw a straight line through several bottoms hit in the past year, that dictates where you put your money?
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Bitcoin is an ecological disaster...
smacl wrote: » Strawman much Johnny? The fact that large scale crytpo mining is a waste of resources and environmentally unfriendly, which I'd agree it currently is, has very little bearing on its value or financial viability. Cars represent a far bigger waste of resources and threat to the environment the that doesn't stop the automotive industry being viable now does it?