Lorelli! wrote: » How about MIT Professer Neri Oxman? "She is known for art and architecture that combine design, biology, computing, and materials engineering."https://www.google.ie/search?q=neri+oxman&client=ms-android-h3g-ie&prmd=inv&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5ppbBz6XaAhVnLMAKHYT2Bn4Q_AUICCgB&biw=320&bih=454#imgrc=hvIcakZ2tcZoKM:https://www.google.ie/search?q=neri+oxman&client=ms-android-h3g-ie&prmd=inv&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5ppbBz6XaAhVnLMAKHYT2Bn4Q_AUICCgB&biw=320&bih=454#imgrc=Bzca7TCnwvfuiM:
Jack Kanoff wrote: » And a damn fine poker player to boot! Increases the hotness in my book
Hercule Poirot wrote: » I love it when she breaks out in fluent calculus during sex, major turn on.....
Deleted User wrote: » I just love that people have other tastes than me. For me, your Rachel is possibly a 4, and that would depend on her personality being stunning. Just comes down to a personal preference. Thankfully.
jaxxx wrote: » Rachel Riley? 4?? :eek: Can someone call an ambulance please?? Klaz has suffered a traumatic episode. Klaz is clearly in shock! Hurry!!
tayto lover wrote: » All good but no better than a 7/10 whereas Rachel gets a 10.
.red. wrote: » I'm another one who doesn't get the whole Rachel Riley obsession. I really don't see what the fuss is about. I don't think she's ugly, but she's far from a perfect 10. (IMO)
.red. wrote: I'm another one who doesn't get the whole Rachel Riley obsession. I really don't see what the fuss is about. I don't think she's ugly, but she's far from a perfect 10. (IMO)
PokeHerKing wrote: » How far from a 10 would you say she is? A perfect 10 will always be subjective and really just a question of personal tastes. A 4/10 is reserved for the chubby busty brunette in your office. Just rating Rachel's body gives her at least a 7/10. As in if you picked 10 women at random off the street her body would be better than 60% of them. Any bloke who gives her a 4/10 is gay imo.
.red. wrote: » This thread is called "the most beautiful women in the world". It's obviously down to personal taste and everyone's different. Rachel isnt my type, saying that, I can usually look at someone and say, "not my cuppa tea but a stunning girl". With Rachel, she isn't my cuppa tea but I also don't see the attraction with her!! I really don't. I never said I'd give her a 4/10, and I wouldnt. For me she's not even that. I'm not even being cheeky or looking to wind you up.
PokeHerKing wrote: » Just rating Rachel's body gives her at least a 7/10. As in if you picked 10 women at random off the street her body would be better than 60% of them.
Any bloke who gives her a 4/10 is gay imo.
Deleted User wrote: Personally, I've always preferred small, quite slim, small breasted women with dark hair. Hence, I've lived in Asia for the last decade. I prefer 90% of Asian women to 95 % of white women. I still like or appreciate Spanish/Italian women, but I have very little interest in white women, and it's extremely rare that I find blonds attractive.
PokeHerKing wrote: » If you've got such a narrow almost fetish like "type" this ain't the thread for you. Stick to manga websites.
garbo speaks wrote: » I really hope Louise O'Neill sees this thread.
Deleted User wrote: » And to get back on track. Hopefully.Seojin_ban (instagram account)Jess.02.23 (ins)vivien gutmannSophia Miacova