nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Porn is f*cked

If you've used the internet to have a **** at any time over the past 18 months or so, there's probably a good chance you know that incest porn is all the rage. The front pages on Porn Hub or whatever your first port of call is in regards to **** is likely littered with videos of sexual activity between relations at this very moment. In some cases, the male performer often stipulates, 'It's okay.....I'm your step son' and the title often backs that fantasy up, but in other productions it appears that the actors are playing blood relations, whether that's a mother and son, father and daughter, or brother and sister.

That in itself is pretty disturbing, but it gets much, much worse. Not only are they suggesting that two blood relations are bumping uglies, but the subtext also indicates a level of child sex abuse. Let me explain.

I watched one video recently and the premise is this: some fella - whose face you can't see because it's POV - complains that he can't go to school because he has a headache. The 'mum' gives him a tablet but it turns out that she didn't give him a paracetemol, but a viagra. Naturally, he complains that "something weird is happening down there". She tells him to have a **** basically, but it turns out he doesn't know what that is, so she goes, 'Don't worry, sweetie. Mommy will take care of that for you'. Eighteen minutes later and he's popping on her belly. She's breathing heavily and repeating the phrase 'Good boy' in hushed tones.

You can't tell me that the subtext doesn't subtly hint that the video is actually a mother shagging her pre-pubescent son, a boy who doesn't even know what masturbation is or how it's achieved.

Legally I suspect it's fine, but morally it's on another level of f*cked up and you really do wonder what effect it has on young lads. What happened to the classic if stereotypical pizza delivery driver who gets a very generous tip? Or the plumber who gets his own pipe seen to? Or the teacher who wants a bold student to stay behind after class for a special lesson?

Worse yet, it's going to get even weirder. F*ck knows how, because the bar has been set pretty low with these sick f*cks who appeal to peoples' paedophilia fantasies, but it will get worse. Not long from now we'll probably be saying, 'Say, whatever happened to just normal, run-of-the-mill daddy-daughter porn?'

Porn is f*cked.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

OP you know "school" in America means University level too ?

Franz Von Peppercorn

Hammer89 wrote: »

If you've used the internet to have a **** at any time over the past 18 months or so, there's probably a good chance you know that incest porn is all the rage. The front pages on Porn Hub or whatever your first port of call is in regards to **** is likely littered with videos of sexual activity between relations at this very moment. In some cases, the male performer often stipulates, 'It's okay.....I'm your step son' and the title often backs that fantasy up, but in other productions it appears that the actors are playing blood relations, whether that's a mother and son, father and daughter, or brother and sister.

That in itself is pretty disturbing, but it gets much, much worse. Not only are they suggesting that two blood relations are bumping uglies, but the subtext also indicates a level of child sex abuse. Let me explain.

I watched one video recently and the premise is this: some fella - whose face you can't see because it's POV - complains that he can't go to school because he has a headache. The 'mum' gives him a tablet but it turns out that she didn't give him a paracetemol, but a viagra. Naturally, he complains that "something weird is happening down there". She tells him to have a **** basically, but it turns out he doesn't know what that is, so she goes, 'Don't worry, sweetie. Mommy will take care of that for you'. Eighteen minutes later and he's popping on her belly. She's breathing heavily and repeating the phrase 'Good boy' in hushed tones.

You can't tell me that the subtext doesn't subtly hint that the video is actually a mother shagging her pre-pubescent son, a boy who doesn't even know what masturbation is or how it's achieved.

Legally I suspect it's fine, but morally it's on another level of f*cked up and you really do wonder what effect it has on young lads. What happened to the classic if stereotypical pizza delivery driver who gets a very generous tip? Or the plumber who gets his own pipe seen to? Or the teacher who wants a bold student to stay behind after class for a special lesson?

Worse yet, it's going to get even weirder. F*ck knows how, because the bar has been set pretty low with these sick f*cks who appeal to peoples' paedophilia fantasies, but it will get worse. Not long from now we'll probably be saying, 'Say, whatever happened to just normal, run-of-the-mill daddy-daughter porn?'

Porn is f*cked.

Eighteeen minutes later? Did you literally **** off to incest porn and then come to the internet to complain about incest porn?

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

Eighteeen minutes later? Did you literally **** off to incest porn and then come to the internet to complain about incest porn?

That's the single worst cast of buyers remorse I've ever encountered...

BoatMad wrote: »

I saw a documentary on Netflix that seems to suggest that most porn these days is non professional , so I dont think , But Ive no proof, that theres " lots of lads" having any sort of issues

if you can provide some reliable statistics, Id gladly revise my opinion

No statistics. Just can’t imagine looking at that misogynistic gonzo porn on a regular basis is good for a fella. Might give impressionable sorts the wrong idea about what ridin’ Is all about. Which is having great fun with a partner, and not treating them like a piece of cheap meat. Those auld sites seem to be gettin’ increasingly nasty and extreme. One time a lad would be buckled with the horn after catching a hint of a nipple on TV, or having a hand shandy thinking about poking Mary who works the tills in SuperValu.

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

Eighteeen minutes later? Did you literally **** off to incest porn and then come to the internet to complain about incest porn?

Perhaps it was research, or the OPs eyesight is starting to go and it took that long to focus and realise what he was watching?

Richard Hillman

The whole Step-brother/sister/father/mother genre is ridiculous. Porn-Hub has to crack down on it. It's wrong.

TomSweeney wrote: »

OP you know "school" in America means University level too ?

Do university students not know what masturbation is either? I'm telling you lads, the video was really about a mother riding her child, not her fully-grown son, which is bad enough. The undertones and language obviously suggest this.

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

Eighteeen minutes later? Did you literally **** off to incest porn and then come to the internet to complain about incest porn?

Hmm, the video is 18 minutes long. That wasn't the length of time I watched.

ReReginald Perrin

Richard Hillman wrote: »

The whole Step-brother/sister/father/mother genre is ridiculous. Porn-Hub has to crack down on it. It's wrong.

The public gets what the public wants

Do university students not know what masturbation is either? I'm telling you lads, the video was really about a mother riding her child, not her fully-grown son, which is bad enough. The undertones and language obviously suggest this.

I just watched a " movie " ( for a whole 90 minutes too ) , where 7 cowboys rode over a hill and shot up a load of Mexicans , I mean whats the world coming to , one was even bald headed. I tell you were all in trouble , I can see " lads" buying horses and riding over the fields to find these guys and shoot them up

the world is f&*ked , I tell you

BoatMad wrote: »

I just watched a " movie " ( for a whole 90 minutes too ) , where 7 cowboys rode over a hill and shot up a load of Mexicans , I mean whats the world coming to , one was even bald headed. I tell you were all in trouble , I can see " lads" buying horses and riding over the fields to find these guys and shoot them up

the world is f&*ked , I tell you

I'm not sure you're grasping what is a pretty basic point. I'm well aware that it wasn't her real son. I'm well aware that they are merely porn actors. But in spite of the fact it wasn't real, it doesn't make the undercurrent of paedophilia any less disturbing.

Sex between blood relations is already pretty out there, but when the dialogue clearly suggests that it's sex between a mother and young child then that's another level of weird. If you disagree fair enough, but I'll be bumping this thread in a few years when fantasy porn involving necraphilia hits the mainstream. "It's grand, it's not really her son and he's not really dead."

We need to have porn classes in school to teacher our children how to view it!

Do university students not know what masturbation is either? I'm telling you lads, the video was really about a mother riding her child, not her fully-grown son, which is bad enough. The undertones and language obviously suggest this.

what " undercurrent "
are you suggesting that a movie is representative of real life !!!

loads of movies deal with distasteful situations, death , murder, etc, you can see detective/crime series dealing with incest , rape , etc every day of the week on TV , does that suggest that incest is prevalent

as I said , 7 guys on horses shooting up mexicans, does that suggest that loads of people are saddling up

perhaps you might give the " viewers more credit , even kids can detect the difference between fact and fiction on the TV from a young age

your posts smacks more of a " moral panic " type of approach , that any issue in real life

freshpopcorn wrote: »

We need to have porn classes in school to teacher our children how to view it!

You mean in 1080p or high, right?? :pac:

jaxxx wrote: »

You mean in 1080p or high, right?? :pac:

They need classes on everything!

freshpopcorn wrote: »

We need to have porn classes in school to teacher our children how to view it!

hmm, how to view it , do people have a problem with their eyes

perhaps you meant to say , " to teach them to interpret what they are viewing "

jaxxx wrote: »

You mean in 1080p or high, right?? :pac:

VR headsets with 360 views ftw

BoatMad wrote: »

what " undercurrent "
are you suggesting that a movie is representative of real life !!!

loads of movies deal with distasteful situations, death , murder, etc, you can see detective/crime series dealing with incest , rape , etc every day of the week on TV , does that suggest that incest is prevalent

as I said , 7 guys on horses shooting up mexicans, does that suggest that loads of people are saddling up

perhaps you might give the " viewers more credit , even kids can detect the difference between fact and fiction on the TV from a young age

your posts smacks more of a " moral panic " type of approach , that any issue in real life

Your post smacks of someone who didn't read the OP because you clearly don't know what the topic is about. Nobody said incest is prevalent. Had you read what's actually being discussed instead of trying to be funny with a post about mexicans then you'd know.

Hammer89 wrote: »

Your post smacks of someone who didn't read the OP because you clearly don't know what the topic is about. Nobody said incest is prevalent. Had you read what's actually being discussed instead of trying to be funny with a post about mexicans then you'd know.

sorry , Ive read the whole thread and I say it again , the OP is engaging in a form of moral panic generation

The fact is the vast majority of porn is essentially acting , in thats respects its exactly the same as watching any movie or detective series

thats why I draw the comparison with the cowboys

on the other hand , if the OP can advance reliable statistics , or point us to reliable peer reviewed academic sources to back up his contention , i will of course consider what he says , with some validation

up to that point its merely an opinion and a rather uninformed one at that

BoatMad wrote: »

hmm, how to view it , do people have a problem with their eyes

perhaps you meant to say , " to teach them to interpret what they are viewing "

Kind of a mixture of both to be honest!

I think the OP has been let loose on the internet for the first time.

He will be telling all his friends that Facebook are going to start charging and all the other crap.

Rodents in cans/bottles of coca cola etc

BoatMad wrote: »

sorry , Ive read the whole thread and I say it again , the OP is engaging in a form of moral panic generation

The fact is the vast majority of porn is essentially acting , in thats respects its exactly the same as watching any movie or detective series

thats why I draw the comparison with the cowboys

on the other hand , if the OP can advance reliable statistics , or point us to reliable peer reviewed academic sources to back up his contention , i will of course consider what he says , with some validation

up to that point its merely an opinion and a rather uninformed one at that

No you didn't read the whole thread. You scanned a few responses, got a false impression of what the subject actually is and made a joke about cowboys. I hope there was no subtitles in that film you watched because clearly you're adverse to reading. You thought I was suggesting incest is on the rise when actually I said incest porn and now ego prevents you from admitting as much.

Ah porn is boring nowadays anyway. It's all the same.... save for 2 ladies 1.... room

And 0 f*cking men!

Franz Von Peppercorn

Hammer89 wrote: »

Hmm, the video is 18 minutes long. That wasn't the length of time I watched.

Sure.

Franz Von Peppercorn

I’ve just gone to pornhub on private mode and literally saw none of these in the titles in the first few pages.

( It’s been a while since I went there. When will the girls ever learn there’s no actual job in that black couch place)

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

Sure.

Heck I only got through the first 20 seconds!

Hammer89 wrote: »

No you didn't read the whole thread. You scanned a few responses, got a false impression of what the subject actually is and made a joke about cowboys. I hope there was no subtitles in that film you watched because clearly you're adverse to reading. You thought I was suggesting incest is on the rise when actually I said incest porn and now ego prevents you from admitting as much.

sorry , since you arnt looking over my shoulder, I can tell you I did , I certainly read all of yours

You can't tell me that the subtext doesn't subtly hint that the video is actually a mother shagging her pre-pubescent son, a boy who doesn't even know what masturbation is or how it's achieved.

Legally I suspect it's fine, but morally it's on another level of f*cked up and you really do wonder what effect it has on young lads. What happened to the classic if stereotypical pizza delivery driver who gets a very generous tip? Or the plumber who gets his own pipe seen to? Or the teacher who wants a bold student to stay behind after class for a special lesson?

Worse yet, it's going to get even weirder. F*ck knows how, because the bar has been set pretty low with these sick f*cks who appeal to peoples' paedophilia fantasies, but it will get worse. Not long from now we'll probably be saying, 'Say, whatever happened to just normal, run-of-the-mill daddy-daughter porn

what you are clearly intimating is that these videos are influencing people, " appeal to peoples' paedophilia fantasies," , yet you advance no statistics or evidence that what you say is nothing more then your own simple opinion.

TV in general "appeals " to people fantasy as does porn, thats the whole point , ask yourself why we have crime series that deal with incest , child abuse , horrific violence etc , the answer is ........

answer is , its fantasy , thats the answer , its when you conflate that with reality that you stray into the area of moral panic, which is why I raised the comparison

ps have a look at the BBC mini series top of the lake ,

Is now a good time to introduce the subject of Gilfs?

Irish Guitarist

If someone were to hump a ladder in one of these videos would it say "it's okay, I'm a stepladder"?

BBDBB wrote: »

Is now a good time to introduce the subject of Gilfs?

If you're talking about Jane Seymour, then hell yes!

If you think porn is bad here - keep well away from Japan and their porn - incest is the least of your worries!