freshpopcorn wrote: » No but if they did they'd have being found not guilty because they did nothing wrong if an allegation was made!
holyhead wrote: » In terms of Jackson's apology the sincerity of it will be proven by his subsequent behaviour towards women. Any man who has pride in himself would be mortified to have such juvenile/disrespectful text messages shown to the world.
erica74 wrote: » To be fair the thread has turned to a more general discussion about the aspects of society that this case has highlighted so I think it's reasonable enough that everyone is contributing their experience and views.
AllForIt wrote: » Disappointed to see Jackson making a public apology for the text messages which you know technically are supposed to be private - it's not like he posted them on twitter. Obviously just like when anyone in the public eye is shown to have done something that does not meet the standard of the morally superior public which doesn't even exist, it is the done thing that if they want to keep working in their profession they must issue an emphatic unreserved apology - and that is of course the only reason he issued this apology today.
freshpopcorn wrote: » cloudatlas wrote: » The height of whataboutery, subtext matters so much that you can't derive meaning from projected conversations and examples. We have an actual example we know the context of it and we react accordingly but then the AH whataboutery patrol arrives with what if and a whole load of nonsense that we have no context for at all- how the hell is the poster supposed to respond to the little information and the imagined scenarios you have concocted. Well I know if I was in a relationship with somebody for a good while and if I found out they did somebody when they were younger and stupid and they weren't like that now or it was just a one off. I believe I'd continue the relationship with them. I basically asked could she stay in a relationship with somebody that did something stupid when they were younger even tough it was something she despised.
cloudatlas wrote: » The height of whataboutery, subtext matters so much that you can't derive meaning from projected conversations and examples. We have an actual example we know the context of it and we react accordingly but then the AH whataboutery patrol arrives with what if and a whole load of nonsense that we have no context for at all- how the hell is the poster supposed to respond to the little information and the imagined scenarios you have concocted.
Appledreams15 wrote: » Please everyone else think what you like of SO. He has been found innocent. In my experience, I have been raped. I feel that I can feel a similiar energy in other 'rapist' men. I sense it off him. It is a particular kind of cruelty. In that sense I would run a mile. Again this is my personal account, not speaking for all people etc!
tretorn wrote: » Oh stop with the metoo stuff appledream, I knew we would have a lot of this, all these metoo claims, , did you report it to the Gardai, if the answer is no, then report it today. How can you get a sense of anyone by reading about them on twitter, you sound deranged. I knew those women marching had a screw loose, its quite obvious, I get a sense of that looking at their unwashed hair.
RuMan wrote: » Extrordinarily magnanimous gesture by Jacko considering what he has been subjected to. Lets now try and get him back for a few Ulster games before the season end. Given the media circus his Irish return would involve it will make better sense to bring him back for our national team in the summer tour to Australia.Delighted to see this sorry episode put behind us as the entire country gets behind Jacko and the boys for the 2019 rugby football world cup.
holyhead wrote: » In terms of Jackson's apology the sincerity of it will be proven by his subsequent behaviour towards women. Any man who has pride in himself would be mortified to have such juvenile/disrespectful text messages shown to the world. It was a well worded apology.
Appledreams15 wrote: » I feel that I can feel a similiar energy in other 'rapist' men.
Deleted User wrote: » Normally I don't like the Daily Mail but they have this comment section that allows you to upvote/downvote as you see fit- it's quite cathartic.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5585961/It-degrading-offensive-Ulster-rugby-star-cleared-rape-apologises-WhatsApp-chats.html
FrancieBrady wrote: » The mob's mind is made up Jackson's apology has been carefully scripted, I sense the IRFU are going to face the rabble down. I see Ulster rugby have massively lifted their game tonight. Maybe, support for the boys will be the catalyst for them now.
Infini wrote: » I'll just be honest, the one thing disgusting me at this stage is how some don't care that he's found innocent by a COURT OF LAW, he guilty no matter what and that's what I don't like. Sure he's far from being an angel for crying out loud but the serious problem I find is that there's a toxic cohort on the likes of cancer media that have decided hes guilty and they'll destroy him for it no matter what. These kinds of people NEED to lay off, they can have a legitimate case about how convictions on rape are too low and that there needs to be change and I would agree to that extent but crucifying him like some witch hunt only DAMAGES them. He was found innocent in a court of law, not cancer media's kangaroo court, make change through positive campaigning don't try to force it otherwise all they'll cause in the long run is a pushback against their agenda because some people wont put up with BS grade carryon.
erica74 wrote: » Can I just ask the posters defending the group chat and texts as essentially a once off or a snapshot or whatever, do you honestly think that that one night and the following morning (or whatever time period the released messages span) are the only times these guys use that kind of language? They talk about this sort of stuff like it's a regular occurrence, and while that's fine if all involved are willing participants, the claims that there's only a few texts and these texts are an anomaly is a bit naive. Maybe all involved will use this as an opportunity to examine how they view women. I'm not talking about the group sex and all that fun stuff, that's grand if everyone is a willing participant, I'm talking about the way they speak. They themselves acknowledge their choice of language is bad.
Deleted User wrote: » Jackson has moved from "I'll sue you're fcking ass" to "I'm so, so, so sorry" (insert picture of Father Jack here from the relevant episode) As the judge said at the trail, there's no place in this court for emotion. Well Paddy, now's the time for emotion- so don't insult our intelligence with your pseudo grovelling scripted by your goons- we're not falling for it.
tretorn wrote: » Let the rugby people behave the way they like, if they want threesomes in the bed and women are happy to be the spit in the roast then you mind your own business.
RuMan wrote: » Do you not think there could be argument for starting Jacko with Carbery on the bench and giving Sexton a rest? Throw him in at deep end and try and get him involved in a bit of action straight away.
joe40 wrote: » People are going to say nearly all young men go on like that. I have enough life experience to know that is simply not true. I have taught for over 20 years in a sec school and worked with 100 of young adults. Sure there are horrible Individuals both male and female, that degrade, bully, take advantage of others, but they are not TYPICAL. Thats the thing this attitude and behaviour may be out and prevalent but it is not typical and not normal. Anyone who accepts it as such are doing themselves and their children both boys and girls a major disservice.
Infini wrote: » Hopefully they do. I'm all for legitimate and reasonable debate on issues but these days these #insertwhateverhere BS are usually modern day witch hunting mobs with the same level of ignorant BS that you'd find in the crazy east. Honestly wish some people would cop on and realise they're doing more damage than help by acting this way.