FixdePitchmark wrote: » Only noticed now that my Sky is not HD Is Sky HD extra money - I'm with the terrible virgin. Like watching golf about 10 years ago with trees and grain a bit blurry.
dan_ep82 wrote: » Yep, pretty annoyed with the quality, looks worse than normal channels.
obi604 wrote: » Hi What channels is the master on? Is it something like sky sports only on Thursday and Friday. Then also on BBC on Saturday and Sunday.
Eoinyh wrote: » They should dictate who commentates and kick Mcginley out the gap
Seve OB wrote: » they can and do. pretty sure it was either feherty or mccord who they banned from the place im watching it on OSN HD, uninterrupted coverage, no adds, no studio, just lots of golf
FixdePitchmark wrote: » what is OSN seve and how are you watching.
Seve OB wrote: » TV its the local sports station here. Its the best coverage I've seen in ages, just loads of golf, so the pictures are there if SKY etc want to pick them up they clearly can. Sure there are the usual breaks to show the leaderboards and a few flowers, but in fairness, they are very quick and not that often.
obi604 wrote: » Where is “here”
Tyson Fury wrote: » I like McGinley, offers a lot more than most on sky imo.
WHIP IT! wrote: » Tyson Fury wrote: » I like McGinley, offers a lot more than most on sky imo. You can't possibly be serious. He's horrendous. He annoys me almost as much as Monty and his uncontrollable lips!
First Up wrote: » Nothing horrendous about him. He often brings up technical issues and insights that others (e.g Butch Harmon) don't. And he doesn't slobber over Tiger as some do. He's fine.
kiers47 wrote: » hahaha. Do you ever miss a chance to mention Tiger? You are obsessed with him. McGinley is bang average as a pundit. Better than the US coverage but jesus there are surely better guys out there. Butch is fine. Harrington was good i thought last year.
kiers47 wrote: » First Up wrote: » Nothing horrendous about him. He often brings up technical issues and insights that others (e.g Butch Harmon) don't. And he doesn't slobber over Tiger as some do. He's fine. hahaha. Do you ever miss a chance to mention Tiger? You are obsessed with him. McGinley is bang average as a pundit. Better than the US coverage but jesus there are surely better guys out there. Butch is fine. Harrington was good i thought last year.
sky88 wrote: » if you were to play a drining game for every time mcginley mentioned the ryder honest to god you might die :pac: "Nothing horrendous about him. He often brings up technical issues and insights that others (e.g Butch Harmon) don't. And he doesn't slobber over Tiger as some do" he does the same with rory as the others with tiger. Poulter gets the same attention from sky as well. everyone has there guys they slobber over was watching american coverage last night bit all over the place they seemed to zone in on spieth, li, phil and finau for most of the coverage i seen. does anyone know if sky is using the same shots as american or there own cameras. i assume tonght we will see every shot of tiger and not much else