magick wrote: » He was just showing people to drive around in a clockwise direction
Captain Red Beard wrote: » If you nearly flew into someone sounds like you were in the wrong.
Captain Red Beard wrote: » You're still in the wrong chief.
Wanderer78 wrote: » partly in the wrong, im not going into this too much, google maps below, other driver up matties hill, me down keanes road heading down matties hill, him no right signal heading towards cannon street,yes a right signal is required coming up matties hill heading towards cannon streethttps://www.google.ie/maps/@52.2509394,-7.1268729,3a,75y,336.93h,75.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWWyVoo3Wcj0dyyC_clp88Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en again, theres an inconstancy in the layout of our roundabouts thats confusing everybody, including me
barneystinson wrote: Unless he was indicating left and appeared to be turning, then you absolutely are at fault, it's up to you to yield to traffic already on a roundabout. Unless he was indicating left and taking a line consistent with that, and then threw a last second shimmy to stay on and head for Cannon St then his presence on the roundabout trumps anything to do with indicators that you might throw up in your defence.
barneystinson wrote: » Unless he was indicating left and appeared to be turning, then you absolutely are at fault, it's up to you to yield to traffic already on a roundabout. Unless he was indicating left and taking a line consistent with that, and then threw a last second shimmy to stay on and head for Cannon St then his presence on the roundabout trumps anything to do with indicators that you might throw up in your defence.
Squidvicious wrote: » barneystinson wrote: » Unless he was indicating left and appeared to be turning, then you absolutely are at fault, it's up to you to yield to traffic already on a roundabout. Unless he was indicating left and taking a line consistent with that, and then threw a last second shimmy to stay on and head for Cannon St then his presence on the roundabout trumps anything to do with indicators that you might throw up in your defence. To be fair to Wanderer, if I'm understanding him correctly, the other driver was taking the third exit off the roundabout but he didn't indicate so Wanderer not unreasonably assumed(in the absence of any indicator) that he was taking the second exit(i.e. going straight). I suppose the bottom line is that we all need to be careful on roundabouts - if there's no indicator, you've got to remember that the other driver could easily have forgotten to indicate. However, it seems to me that Wanderer is being quite reasonable here and accepts that he was partly at fault too. But the other driver seems to me to have been at fault for not indicating.
Mossy Monk wrote: » A thread about someone swinging his mickey around has turned into a thread about roundabout etiquette.
Wanderer78 wrote: » In that particular incident, the driver was taking the second exit, as was I, i.e. both of us, as far as in aware, should have a right signal leaving the roundabout?
barneystinson wrote: » Wanderer78 wrote: » In that particular incident, the driver was taking the second exit, as was I, i.e. both of us, as far as in aware, should have a right signal leaving the roundabout? You should NEVER be indicating right exiting a roundabout. Logic and common sense should tell you that you're always turning left off a roundabout and should therefore be indicating left. And failing that, the ROTR state it explicitly. https://youtu.be/4rsdaSTOkWk
Wanderer78 wrote: » Correct, but this actually wasn't the issue. What indication do you think a person moving up Mattie's hill, heading towards canon st should have, upon entering the roundabout? Thank you
barneystinson wrote: » Wanderer78 wrote: » Correct, but this actually wasn't the issue. What indication do you think a person moving up Mattie's hill, heading towards canon st should have, upon entering the roundabout? Thank you Right, based on the road markings and on the fact that their intended exit is beyond 12 o'clock... However, unless they've sat into the left hand lane (for Keane's rd) and indicated left, then once they're on the roundabout before you, they've the right of way and if you proceed into their path it's pretty much entirely your fault.
Wanderer78 wrote: » They were in the correct lane, with no indication at any stage
robtri wrote: » as annoying as that is... you would be 100% in the wrong if you pulled out and an accident occurred.. there is no but he was wrong by not indicating argument... he had right of way ... sorry but thats the way it goes
Wanderer78 wrote: » oh i do agree, id be screwed, and of course i did make a mistake, but im not the only one to think, theres something a little 'weird' with that roundabout, and there is something wrong with 'altered' roundabouts, it causes confusion, ive seen crashes on them as they have slightly different rules compared to the standard roundabout. id say, legally id be 100% in the wrong, but in reality im not, as i said, the person before me even got confused, wrong lane, no signalling etc, it really is common, we all need refresher lessons, we really all should be regularly checked, id more than likely fail the test if i redone it now, and i suspect many others would to, very poor system
Johnboy1951 wrote: Maybe whoever designed the roundabout and road markings needs a refresher course in practicalities! There is no right turn from that roundabout when coming up Mattie's Hill. The road continues on the other side of the roundabout .... Mattie's Hill again. Having considered it weird previously, I now consider it dangerous ..... particularly for someone who is not familiar with the road.
Wanderer78 wrote: » It's actually what I'm thinking myself, I probably should report it, I do think it's a little dangerous myself, I'd rather not see an accident on it
Jamie2k9 wrote: » Anyone know what happened at around 7 this evening, 2 Fire, Ambulance, Garda and Cost Guard flow over the bridge. Ambulances were back quick but garda van been escorted by a fire engine either side towards the Tower.
***Incident Call-out*** At approximately 18:47 our pagers were activated by the Irish Coast Guard, MRCC ( Marine Rescue Co-ordination Centre) with report of a causality in the water near Rice Bridge. Crew responded and were ready to launch at 19:00, Waterford City Fire Service Boat who were already on scene recovered the causality from the water and made their way back to the Plaza Marina. We assisted with the transfer and initial First Aid, as causality who was very responsive but in shock on the marina, minutes later the causality was then handed over to the care and professional service of Waterford Ambulance Service, where immediate treatment was administered before making their way to University Hospital Waterford. Also on scene at this time and ready to assist were An Garda Síochána Waterford Gardai and Rescue 117 A very good outcome and an amazing response by all services, we believe a bystander had deployed a Life-Ring to assist the causality, many thanks for your assistance. Please remember whenever you see anyone in difficulty on our Rivers, Lakes or Coastline, Call the Coast Guard on 999 or 112 as they have the resources available to deal with most incidents.
