Harry Palmr wrote: » That is the logical next step, in fact the perfect meta murder would be someone pinging their victim to watch a live stream, seeing the gun for real and themselves on screen at the same moment. Someone will do it. Maybe someone has already done it.
Strawberry Milkshake wrote: » https://twitter.com/realunclewolf1/status/981276764344287232?s=21 Dunno if there is a woman shooting too ????
Berserker wrote: » The shooter is female according to some reports.
greencap wrote: There were that ruddy bloke what were camera man for't' tele.
greencap wrote: » thats comedian bloke innit.
Pelvis wrote: » Female suspected killed.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Tomorrow it will all be forgotten. I often wonder why the parents of the Sandy Hook kids did not try to change the gun laws. Does anyone know why they didn't?
Hande hoche! wrote: » Sam Hyde of MDE fame.
NEWTOWN, Conn. — In the years since his 6-year-old son, Benjamin, was fatally shot at Sandy Hook Elementary School, David Wheeler has testified before state legislatures, lobbied members of Congress and sat beside his wife, Francine, as she delivered a speech during one of President Obama’s weekly addresses, pleading for changes to the nation’s gun laws. This week, the families of the victims plan to be in Hartford, listening as lawyers lay out in state Supreme Court their case that the companies that manufactured and sold the military-style assault rifle used by the gunman bear responsibility for the attack in which 26 people, including 20 children, were killed. They are deploying a novel strategy that the families and their lawyers say could pierce the sweeping shield created by federal law that protects gun companies from litigation and has thwarted countless lawsuits after their weapons were used to commit crimes. Supporters believe that if the court clears the way for a jury trial, the gun companies’ internal communications — which the companies have fought fiercely to keep private — would surface in discovery, a potentially revealing and damaging glimpse into the industry and how it operates. It could also chart a legal road map for the survivors and relatives of victims in other mass shootings as they pursue accountability.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » I think it's a case of a jealous GF shooting her BF another girl and then herself.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » My guess is a “gun rights” advocate.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » Thoughts and prayers. x
Hitman3000 wrote: » Maybe the next shooter will put a live stream camera on their gun.
ceadaoin. wrote: » I can't remember a time in recent years that it was a lone female shooter in an incident like this. Very rare. I wonder what the motive was?
Manic Moran wrote: Basically, it's been done. Happened last year in Cleveland.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Maybe if we called them murderers or assassins rather than Shooters that would be good?
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Again the word "shooter" is ridiculous. But what the heck no one cares the next day anyway.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Active potential assassin FGS. Shooter is just NRA talk. To minimise it.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Shootered. Well she was described as a "Shooter", but in reality was a murderer.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/v2/09e161d1eb3ca4bccc2b187be9315cbc.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/b9d7cf56a75eee6d7dd35aa28294f673.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/4c2f272c464d99a9eee64a80fbe71a0c.svg)
