onlyfinewine wrote: » Alternatively if the car is thirty years old you should not have to pay VRT as you have it for a year before arrival in Ireland.
Silvera wrote: » ^^^ Very interesting! I wasnt aware that Revenue had access (so easily) to such information.
w124man wrote: » Next time you put your car on the boat, put a motion sensitive camera inside your car and see what happens. Just for a giggle!
Silvera wrote: » Revenue staff noting down make/model/reg numbers??
LIGHTNING wrote: » How would they get your credit card info? As that would be a massive data protection breech and a huge violation of PCI compliance standards. Same goes with the ferry details, if that happened to me I'd be kicking off an investigation to see how they got that info.
Dades wrote: » The revenue must be entitled to collect certain information pertaining to cars being brought into the country, which must be collected by the shippers. Method of payment for transport I'd say wouldn't contravene any PCI stuff. Comes across as big brother'esque but it's a great example of effective use of information.
w124man wrote: » I don't se it as big brother'esque at all.
hi5 wrote: » I could put 5 or 6 cars on a lorry transporter in Newry, take the number plates off and drive across the border no problem.
DublinGuy40 wrote: » ok thanks for the information. I am getting a bit suspicious that someone would own a UK car for 10 years and not register it.