Strazdas wrote: » A false rape allegation would be some woman claiming they had sexually assaulted her even though she hadn't even been with them at all or anywhere near a bedroom.
_Dara_ wrote: » My sis and I were discussing the case. She said “I tend to believe women when they say they were raped”. “Always?”, I asked. “Always”. This is commonplace. I wonder would she be grand with her husband being falsely accused? Not all feminists are like this though. I have a friend who is a feminist and she thought the men were innocent based on what she had read of the case.
Jimbob1977 wrote: » The plaintiff's female friend damaged the Prosecution's case from the early days. Stuck her head into the bedroom, but didn't see anything illegal. If a female friend doesn't back you up, it's going to be a tough job to get a conviction.
storker wrote: » I'm neither feminist nor mysogynist, nor a juror on the trial so I didn't hear all of the evidence, but from what I did hear and read, I'd say there was plenty of reasonable doubt, so the result seems a fair one.
eviltwin wrote: » That's the right of the accused and I've no issues with that. I'm just stating my belief the length of time she was on the stand will have a negative impact on those who might be considering bringing a case against an abuser.
Pelvis wrote: » Speak for yourself.
py2006 wrote: » Am I right in saying that the accuser didn't want that woman involved in the case at all? I thought I read somewhere?
Omackeral wrote: » I agree with you. They may have been right dickheads, arrogant and downright disrespectful but that’s not illegal. Feelings don’t come into it in a court of law. The jurors will have done well to keep all that in their minds. I’m sure the judge reminded them of their duty to do that too.
Mr.H wrote: » The worst thing about this is these men now have to live with the "what if's?" for the rest of their lives. They were found not guilty but a lot of people will still judge them. It sounds bad but I hope she genuinely thought she was raped. Not because I wish harm on anyone, but, because if she made the whole thing up, that is the worst thing you could do to anybody.
Omackeral wrote: » Thank Christ you’re not a juror.
_Dara_ wrote: » It kinda seemed to me that she had next-day remorse.
gerrybbadd wrote: » Jesus, what a scary attitude to have. I'm from a small town in the West of Ireland with a population of less than 3,000. I can personally recall 4 cases in the last 15 years where girls have cried rape, and were later found out to have lied
GreeBo wrote: » From my experience, most jurors are idiots who dont understand exactly what it is they are being asked to do. "sure they Garda wouldnt have arrested him if he didnt do it" was the wisdom shared with me by a fellow juror.
_Dara_ wrote: » My sister was sexually abused as a child and I think she lets that colour her judgement too much. She can’t seem to be impartial because of it. I wonder if she was called up for jury duty, would she have to disclose that information?
bluewolf wrote: » You hope she was genuinely raped because false accusations are worse than rape? For real?
GreeBo wrote: » From my experience, most jurors are idiots who dont understand exactly what it is they are being asked to do.
py2006 wrote: » or engaged in consensual sex but lied about that afterwards.
py2006 wrote: » To those kinda feminists the men were guilty before it went to trial. Any other verdict is unacceptable to them.
AttentionBebe wrote: » Insufficient evidence to prosecute ≠ she lied