nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Dash cam thread 2 (car videos only, no commenting on videos)

biko

Follow on from the first one

Kicking off with a classic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_Vvh9exNqs

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Kenny Logins

GreeBo wrote: »

boardz wrote: »

There are no fast lanes in the car park (in fact I'm not aware of any car park with a fast lane).

There are no "fast lanes" anywhere.

Next you're going to tell us there is no Hotel California.

Kamili

GBX wrote: »

It should still load if you were to click the link normally. But on this occasion somebody has removed the link. Quite possibly the Russians**

** May not be them - just in case they are on Boards.

It doesn't though thats the issue, some open most don't.

GBX

Riva10 wrote: »

Not everyone on Boards is on Facebook so videos which are Facebook linked cannot be viewed by all.

It should still load if you were to click the link normally. But on this occasion somebody has removed the link. Quite possibly the Russians**

** May not be them - just in case they are on Boards.

Ewan Hoosarmi

Riva10 wrote: »

Not everyone on Boards is on Facebook so videos which are Facebook linked cannot be viewed by all.

Facebook? That's so 2017.

Riva10

Deleted User wrote: »

An extreme case of "I've got to be in front of that car!"
https://www.facebook.com/adamrwood/videos/10155266057506161/

Not everyone on Boards is on Facebook so videos which are Facebook linked cannot be viewed by all.

GBX

Deleted User wrote: »

An extreme case of "I've got to be in front of that car!"
https://www.facebook.com/adamrwood/videos/10155266057506161/

Its been removed

[Deleted User]

An extreme case of "I've got to be in front of that car!"
https://www.facebook.com/adamrwood/videos/10155266057506161/

fritzelly

inforfun wrote: »

A painful amount of traffic lights in The Netherlands have camera's with the trigger just after the white line.

Grey pole in the middle is a camera. Usually speed and red light combined.
Trigger sensors are also clearly visible in the front of the picture.
The other sensors before the white line are for the red light to go green during quiet hours.

A nice picture of your car going through a red light sets you back €230

If only in Ireland...

Riva10

GreeBo wrote: »

There are no "fast lanes" anywhere.

Never never say "No Slow Lanes anywhere"
Slow lane definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary

inforfun

GreeBo wrote: »

The most amazing surprising thing about that for me is the fact that everyone is stopped behind the line.

A painful amount of traffic lights in The Netherlands have camera's with the trigger just after the white line.

Grey pole in the middle is a camera. Usually speed and red light combined.
Trigger sensors are also clearly visible in the front of the picture.
The other sensors before the white line are for the red light to go green during quiet hours.

A nice picture of your car going through a red light sets you back €230

GreeBo

boardz wrote: »

There are no fast lanes in the car park (in fact I'm not aware of any car park with a fast lane).

There are no "fast lanes" anywhere.

GreeBo

inforfun wrote: »

http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/7396013/0c6c121f/golfbestuurder_zit_te_slapen.html

The most amazing surprising thing about that for me is the fact that everyone is stopped behind the line.

inforfun

jaxxx wrote: »

That is effing ridiculous. I don't care if someone is hogging the overtaking lane or not, there is no excuse for that. Someone like that should be banned from driving for life, and the same goes for all brake checkers.

Wouldnt be the first time someone ending up in court on the basis of a dashcam clip in The Netherlands.

inforfun

Jay.. .a clip with 2 dick heads.

http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/7396209/2b3ce38f/tokkie_is_boos.html

jaxxx

inforfun wrote: »

http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/7396157/affddbd0/audimeneer_is_piswoest.html

"Action" 50 seconds in.

And dont think for 1 second you are special with blaming the dashcammers in this kind of clips.
Took 1 minute before the first post blaming the cammer for going too slow and staying in he overtaking lane too long.

That road has a so called "traject controle" where your average speed is measured of over an x-amount of kilometers. So going to do 100 to overtake quickly will mean you ll have to make up for that somewhere.

On motorways without that system i am all for breaking the speed limit in order to overtake as quickly as possible and not annoy the **** out of people but on those roads....

That is effing ridiculous. I don't care if someone is hogging the overtaking lane or not, there is no excuse for that. Someone like that should be banned from driving for life, and the same goes for all brake checkers.

Sterling Archer

inforfun wrote: »

Action" 50 seconds in.

Skips to 48 seconds cos I don't trust the internet :pac:

jaxxx

inforfun wrote: »

Sure, i accelerate when i overtake to make the overtake as fast as possible and then slow down to the speed limit again. That is how i was taught in the The Netherlands. But speed checks and penalty points have made it that it is now acceptable to need the full length of the M1 from Dublin to Belfast to overtake someone with 1 km/h difference.

Installed a cam in my car this weekend.
Just wait till i post my first clip here

Just not sure if i should keep the sound enabled. Dont want to learn people here nothing but pure, unadulterated swearing from Rotterdam.

Amen to that. Maybe not as necessary on dual carriageways/motorways but certainly on single carriage roads, speeding up when overtaking is a must. It's the only time I actually break the speed limit. Although not sure I'd bother overtaking if the difference was only 1 km/h

inforfun

Sure, i accelerate when i overtake to make the overtake as fast as possible and then slow down to the speed limit again. That is how i was taught in the The Netherlands. But speed checks and penalty points have made it that it is now acceptable to need the full length of the M1 from Dublin to Belfast to overtake someone with 1 km/h difference.

Installed a cam in my car this weekend.
Just wait till i post my first clip here

Just not sure if i should keep the sound enabled. Dont want to learn people here nothing but pure, unadulterated swearing from Rotterdam.

josip

inforfun wrote: »

...
On motorways without that system i am all for breaking the speed limit in order to overtake as quickly as possible and not annoy the **** out of people but on those roads....

Are you crazy inforfun?
Admitting to a transgression of ze rules?

inforfun

http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/7396013/0c6c121f/golfbestuurder_zit_te_slapen.html

inforfun

http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/7396157/affddbd0/audimeneer_is_piswoest.html

"Action" 50 seconds in.

And dont think for 1 second you are special with blaming the dashcammers in this kind of clips.
Took 1 minute before the first post blaming the cammer for going too slow and staying in he overtaking lane too long.

That road has a so called "traject controle" where your average speed is measured of over an x-amount of kilometers. So going to do 100 to overtake quickly will mean you ll have to make up for that somewhere.

On motorways without that system i am all for breaking the speed limit in order to overtake as quickly as possible and not annoy the **** out of people but on those roads....

tedpan

Sam Quentin wrote:

Excuse me emmmm EXCUSE ME SIR, please please come back just listen.. After your first top up we'll match that and if you recommend a friend we'll credit â‚¬50 to your account......

That white E30 at 8 seconds was lovely.

Sam Quentin

Excuse me emmmm EXCUSE ME SIR, please please come back just listen.. After your first top up we'll match that and if you recommend a friend we'll credit €50 to your account...... :pac::pac::pac::pac:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSVP-GjEjik

endacl

inforfun wrote: »

Have you been frozen solid for the last 3 years that you only run into Ronnie Pickering today?

In soviet Russia, Ronnie Pickering run into you.

fritzelly

Tiercel Dave wrote: »

The truck is driving on the hard shoulder, which is not a traffic lane and at 2.33 narrowly avoids taking out a car parked on said shoulder.....

Don't know where you drive but that would be norm for a large truck to move over for cars to pass more safely on country roads
Dunno about the parked car - but the car passing him at that time took forever to pass (10 secs) and tbh the parked doesn't look that close to me so if I was blaming anyone it would be the car driver who doesn't know how to use his accelerator

Edit to add link
http://theory-tester.com/questions/338

Tiercel Dave

fritzelly wrote: »

Ok, what am I missing?
The truck moves over to let cars pass as long as there is a hard shoulder - thats all I can see

The truck is driving on the hard shoulder, which is not a traffic lane and at 2.33 narrowly avoids taking out a car parked on said shoulder.....

fritzelly

inforfun wrote: »

http://i.imgur.com/yOXzQHv.jpg :pac:

If only it was real

fritzelly

B-D-P-- wrote: »

So, I got a cheap dashcam supposedly HD recorder,

Decided now, after looking at the footage it was recording the last few months, I need to get a proper one.

Heres a close call and some terrible driving from this morning.

Skip to 2 mins in.

Ok, what am I missing?
The truck moves over to let cars pass as long as there is a hard shoulder - thats all I can see

inforfun

RobertFoster wrote: »

Who?

:pac:

http://i.imgur.com/yOXzQHv.jpg :pac:

RobertFoster

Who?

:pac: