Effects wrote: » Fake news. Electric bikes can only travel in kph.
lambayire wrote: » There's definitely one lad who is absolutely pegging it down the cycle lane at around 5.30 most evenings. I was driving by the wooden bridge with a clear run and he was easily keeping up with me. I reckon he was easily doing 50kph
railer201 wrote: » Cyclists need to be aware of this guy or guys if there's more than one. You're correct in suggesting the speed might be in excess 50 kph. Any collision with this 'electric' cyclist could be a serious one.
Fighting Tao wrote: » Thank you for your concern.
Raam wrote: » Will you motor-pace me in to work some day?
LennoxR wrote: » E-bikes are a curse. And I don't want to hear this 'one less car' stuff either. Cars don't usually enter off road bike lanes.
loyatemu wrote: » on what basis - if they're legal they won't exceed 25km/h. OK the bikes themselves are heavier, but a fat guy on a hybrid would be heavier than a woman on a road bike so there's a fair bit of variation already anyway.
LennoxR wrote: » They go against everything cycling is about for me.
mrcheez wrote: » Apart from the sport usage, cycling is essentially a way of getting from A to B using a narrow-width apparatus that can squeeze between traffic or go on routes where cars/motorbikes cannot. Sounds like e-bikes fit the bill perfectly.
LennoxR wrote: » Using human power and not a motor.
magicbastarder wrote: » the more people on them, the better it is for all cyclists.
LennoxR wrote: » There is a young gentleman using the bike lanes near me on an e mountain bike who is going well above that every days on paths shared with pedestrians etc. I absolutely hate the things personally. They go against everything cycling is about for me.
Paradicia wrote: » You'd swear he was breaking the law. Just because he's going faster than you doesn't mean he's in the wrong. Any street legal ebike is pedelec so it still requires cycling.
LennoxR wrote: » I don't care at all if he's going faster than me. I do care that he's endangering people by going at least 35 kph (probably more) in areas shared with pedestrians. It's not what cycle paths are designed for. Also, such machines are supposed to be capped at 25kph. So in fact it is not legal.
P_1 wrote: » Sure with a decent tailwind anyone can hit that speed on a road bike on that path without much effort.
Tenzor07 wrote: » Cycled the new section of the S2C path today, full of dirt/gravel, probably still there after the snow, DCC not bothered to send a street sweeper down the path.. Though same along the cycle path to Churchtown, covered in small stones...
marvin42 wrote: » must got worse in last two days, cycled there Monday to Wednesday without noticing anything unusual.