Gatling wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsZsnrqmrnk
mcmoustache wrote: » It takes less than a second for data to be transmitted from Russia to basically anywhere in the world. I's pretty impressive. I believe they call it "The Internet". I think it might catch on.
Gringo180 wrote: » Strange she would do that right under the nose of a camera :pac:
mcmoustache wrote: » I know right? I've never heard of a crime being committed in front of a camera.
Gringo180 wrote: » What crime has been committed? Have you got some intel the rest of us havent got?
Elmer Blooker wrote: » The video in question which I saw earlier on State controlled Irish television, We saw a woman putting ballot papers into a box and nothing else, you and Gatling tell me how this proves that the papers were votes for Putin.
Gatling wrote: » They annexed Crimea on camera and denied it , Why would she be worried it will be denied
Gatling wrote: » Interference with ballot boxes is usually illegal in democratic countries
Gringo180 wrote: » George W Bush doesnt think so. He was elected as US president with half a million votes less than Al Gore.
Gatling wrote: » Still if you have zero opposition do you need ballot stuffing to guarantee a win, Desperation
Uboat wrote: » LOL
Elmer Blooker wrote: » ...... unless its being done by the US of A then its perfectly legal.
mcmoustache wrote: » Learn another song please. That whataboutism doesn't really fly here.
ArchXStanton wrote: » For you fellas it never seems to fly when it shows up your hypocrisy.
mcmoustache wrote: » I don't remember anyone saying it was OK back then. If I had said there was no election tampering in the US you might have a point. But I didn't so you don't.
ArchXStanton wrote: » There has been tons of examples of this the last few days, conveniently used when anyone pulls the US and it's allies up about their own dubious behaviour,all of a sudden it's whataboutery to try deflect away from it,people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
Elmer Blooker wrote: » It is interesting that 'whataboutery' only applies when it involves criticism of the US and its blatant disregard for international law.
ArchXStanton wrote: » Interesting that the UN never pulls them up on it either,No sanctions for Uncle Sam
Skylinehead wrote: » Nor Russia. I mean, you do know how the Security Council works right? Fairly basic concept.
ArchXStanton wrote: » I'd consider the invasion of Syria and then the brass balls to attack the Syrian army that are fighting to hold the country together from a bunch of proxy nutcases a fairly significant violation of international law...where's the condemnation from the other western nations?
Skylinehead wrote: » How in the hell does that relate to my post?
