Cheerful Spring wrote: » The new regime would be controlled by Saudi Arabia and UAE. There more jihadists in Syria than Syrian free army fighters. Assad got toppled those groups would start fighting among themselves and start a new civil war. Iraq is very different the largest ethnic population in Baghdad is Shia.
gandalf wrote: » So you agree then that Russia was always in Syria and were never going to leave. Well we're making progress
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Russia is ally of Syria after WW2. The base at Tartus in open since 1971
gandalf wrote: » So again they were never pulling out
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Is America going to pull of its base in Rhineland-Palatinate ( Germany) or pull of its numerous bases around Asia? Russia standing by its ally in a time of crisis why would they? America has set up 9 or 10 makeshift bases in Syria that's an invasion of another country.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Is America going to pull of its base in Rhineland-Palatinate ( Germany)
gandalf wrote: » Deflection again please Cheerful show some good form and admit you were wrong. Again if you want to discuss other countries and their misdeeds you can start a thread about that.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » It, not deflection you asking Russia to abandon its ally Syria. Tartus naval base existed before this crisis started so it's an irrelevant point to bring it up. America bases are new and do you think America is going to leave Syria when Assad wins?
Cheerful Spring wrote: » The thread title is The Vladimir Putin appreciation thread.
ArchXStanton wrote: » 10 bases...more like 10 training camps
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Agreed, but these bases are like ones they have set up in Afghanistan.
Gatling wrote: » They are operating bases and they are protecting Syrian civilians unlike ass/putin butcher's of Syrians
gandalf wrote: » No I never said that. I responded to a post where you said that Russia got involved to help the Syrian civilians which I have now shown to be absolute bull****. Russia have been involved with boots on the ground since the 1970s and all their recent actions show is them protecting strategic assets and not thecSyrian people. Again you want to discuss the Yanks etc start a thread about it.
ArchXStanton wrote: » Uh-huh...they were a bit light on the ground before the Russians got involved,you mean to tell me the biggest and supposedly most advanced army in the world didn't see all those Toyota pick up trucks thundering across the desert and kicking up dust clouds with head choppers hanging off the back of it before that...who are you kidding
Cheerful Spring wrote: » lol
Gringo180 wrote: » Ah the usual Russia is the bad guy stint by west and there cohorts in the media. Gallup done a survey a few years back, it wasnt Russia who was voted as the greatest threat to world peace with three times the amount of votes to there nearest rivals in 2nd place who was Pakistan. Can anybody guess who was top?
Elmer Blooker wrote: » Even the BBC has given up pretending that NATO is fighting terrorism. The only thing that surprises me about this article is how it got passed British Government censorship. Worth reading.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/raqqas_dirty_secret
Gatling wrote: » Videos of russian election officials stuffing ballot boxes despite putin having no opposition allowed to run ,
ArchXStanton wrote: » As this thread shows there are some that believe the US and its cohorts are there out of some humanitarian reasons....
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » 70% + of the vote in favor of Putin. He's a popular man, like all dictators.
Elmer Blooker wrote: » Amazing that this video has reached western audiences so quickly. It was probably filmed about a week ago.
Gatling wrote: » And he still needed to cheat
Elmer Blooker wrote: » Oh I just realised