Mrs OBumble wrote: » What specific things would you ban, though, and how successful would it be. Usually banning something simply has the effect of making it more attractive. Especially when there's no penalty which someone who says "feck it, doing it anyway" fears.
eg we could raise the minimum age for marriage to 20. But they'd just keep going up north or overseas if the north changed the rules. We could refuse to pay child-benefit to parents under 20 - but that just punishes the kids.
We could make it illegal to live in a caravan - but there's not a surplus of houses or landlords willing to rent to Travellers. We could ban children changing schools during the year - but that just punishes the kids again. Etc.
Every single development study I've ever heard of has found that to influence a culture is a long-term effort, and that educating women is the key to it.
ignorance is strength wrote: » "but I still never got to the crux of how itinerant children attended school in Ireland but never went to school in the UK"
Deleted User wrote: » It's past time for the negative aspects of traveller "culture" to be banned, and for them to be forcibly encouraged to join a modern Ireland. No problem with them keeping and promoting a unique culture, but ffs, lets move on from the dark ages.
Graces7 wrote: » With travellers there are strong cultural reasons
Andy From Sligo wrote: » interesting take on this - so I presume every (settled) child is required to get an education because the state care for their welfare? (is that the reason?) but traveller children are not required to get an education???? - so the state dont care for their welfare ? - if so at what line does the state not intervene in other traveller child welfare?
Rubberchikken wrote: » Children in ireland are not required to attend school. They're required to get an education. Two different things. Traveller children attend when they want
Noveight wrote: » In my experience traveler kids attend school here in Ireland until they’ve their Junior Cert done. Even then their attendance was quite poor, maybe missing 2 days out of 5. They had no interest in furthering themselves with education nor benefitting from it, it was rather an obligation.
biko wrote: » Is there a question in there somewhere?
Hitman3000 wrote: » Do they still mend pots and pans? Sure why not say nacker?
NewbridgeIR wrote: What's wrong with tinker?
Omackeral wrote: » Also, itinerant? Why don't you just say Traveller?
Andy From Sligo wrote: » but I still never got to the crux of how itinerant children attended school in Ireland but never went to school in the UK.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » All that money pumped into Pavee Point and what have we got? Does anyone see an improvement in education levels anywhere?
Omackeral wrote: » Doesn't offend me, just wondering why you used that word. Don't hear it all that much. Also, why did you include a selfie?
Andy From Sligo wrote: » ok then - if it makes you less offended ... Traveller
Omackeral wrote: » It's an Andy From Sligo thread. It's the equivalent of emptying a load of scrabble letters onto a page..
Omackeral wrote: » It's an Andy From Sligo thread. It's the equivalent of emptying a load of scrabble letters onto a page. Also, itinerant? Why don't you just say Traveller?
Foxhound38 wrote: » Part of the problem historically has been traveller parents taking kids out of school after or in some cases even before primary school has been completed. There's a couple of reasons for this: many traveller parents themselves have had extremely negative experiences in their own schooling when by default travellers were put in special classes and outcomes were almost built to be low, and bullying by both peers and teachers were rife. Many traveller families also suffer from low or absent literacy rates in the adult population so that makes helping their children with schoolwork difficult. Also high unemployment in that community makes school clothes, trips, uniforms etc a significant expense and often there are gaps in knowledge about services available to assist with that. There are cultural issues too - often traveller children are expected to start taking on adult responsibilities and roles in their early teens and school gets in the way of that. Women are often expected to get married and have children young, so again education gets in the way of that. On that, it is a thing that many traveller communities would be concerned about traveller girls mixing and fraternizing outside of their communities for obvious reasons, and I have read somewhere that secular sex education outside of the home is a particular worry and stigma. On the other side, schools traditionally weren't in too much of a hurry to chase traveller children who stopped attending and often principles weren't too happy about having them at their schools in the first place. Part of this is down to perceived behavioral problems that come with it, part of it is the added stress of keeping track of children with a nomadic lifestyle, part of it is just prejudice. I'm no apologist for the worst aspects of traveller culture (and there ARE definitely a cultural problems regardless of what John Connors and Pavee Point have to say about it - look at the prison, basic literacy, drug addiction and teen pregnancy ratios compared with the settled population and tell me with a bare face that there isn't a huge cultural issue here), but I'm convinced a dedicated (and in the case of non-compliance by either school or family, ruthless) campaign in terms of ensuring at least leaving cert is attained, particularly by traveller girls could blunt some of the bigger problems that we are seeing currently within a generation.