na1 wrote: » BTW, what is the NATO-s definition of international law? The Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq are just curious.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Discodog wrote: » Putin says this & wonders why the UK blame himPutin briefly dropped his image as Russia’s tough but merciful czar to make clear that he could forgive misdeeds by wayward subjects but “not everything.” Asked what could not be forgiven, Mr. Putin said bluntly, “Betrayal.”https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/14/world/europe/skripal-putin-poisoning-russia.html The difference is the UK has not yet provided anything that would categorically show Putin and Kremlin ordered this attack.
Discodog wrote: » Putin says this & wonders why the UK blame himPutin briefly dropped his image as Russia’s tough but merciful czar to make clear that he could forgive misdeeds by wayward subjects but “not everything.” Asked what could not be forgiven, Mr. Putin said bluntly, “Betrayal.”https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/14/world/europe/skripal-putin-poisoning-russia.html
na1 wrote: » So your previous statement about "violation of international law" was not true? So the Russia (or actually the Crimea) has violated the Ukrainian Constitution? That's also being disputed, the Republic of Crimea never formally accept the Ukrainian Constitution. And Ukraine never signed the border demarcation with Russia anyway. So formally there were no officially acknowledged borders.
gandalf wrote: » na1 wrote: » BTW, what is the NATO-s definition of international law? The Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq are just curious. Ah deflection when you know you are wrong play the deflection card
gandalf wrote: » na1 wrote: » So your previous statement about "violation of international law" was not true? So the Russia (or actually the Crimea) has violated the Ukrainian Constitution? That's also being disputed, the Republic of Crimea never formally accept the Ukrainian Constitution. And Ukraine never signed the border demarcation with Russia anyway. So formally there were no officially acknowledged borders. No it is true. Illegal from a Ukrainian point of view and illegal from an international perspective.
Pouring troops over the border and then forcing a vote under the eye of those troops whist excluding residents of the Crimea and citizens of Ukraine does not make a legitimate vote
josip wrote: » na1 wrote: » BTW, what is the NATO-s definition of international law? The Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq are just curious. Are you from east of here by any chance?
gandalf wrote: » Lol how is it fantasy news, the Novofuhrer pinned medals on those troops chests. Do you get paid by the word or the post there in Savushkina Street?
Elmer Blooker wrote: » Just shows what you know! Why did Britain allow these oligarchs into the country in the first place? These mafia as you call them are anti Putin which is the reason why they cleared out of Russia with their loot. Go ahead and seize the billions, who cares! It would serve them right.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Russia for me intervenes after the uprising and coup are underway and there is a threat to Russia speaking people in Crimea, Georgia. Putin has not yet started a war on his own.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » The difference is the UK has not yet provided anything that would categorically show Putin and Kremlin ordered this attack. There are 150 million people in Russia so how they know this attack was not carried out by Anti Putin people inside Russia? Skipral was a UK spy since 2010 he could had bad relationships with other people who wanted him dead. Russia is an easy scapegoat in 2018..
Discodog wrote: » In that case Russia is guilty for allowing nerve agents to get into the hands of others. They are also guilty for breaching the conventions on the continual development of such weapons.
Discodog wrote: » Cheerful Spring wrote: » The difference is the UK has not yet provided anything that would categorically show Putin and Kremlin ordered this attack. There are 150 million people in Russia so how they know this attack was not carried out by Anti Putin people inside Russia? Skipral was a UK spy since 2010 he could had bad relationships with other people who wanted him dead. Russia is an easy scapegoat in 2018.. In that case Russia is guilty for allowing nerve agents to get into the hands of others. They are also guilty for breaching the conventions on the continual development of such weapons.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Sure but lets us have that investigation. Russia has asked the UK for a test sample and they have refused. If it's Russia state-sponsored terrorism why are they afraid to work with Russia on this?
na1 wrote: » One of the inventors of the Novichok agent emigrated(escaped?)
Gatling wrote: » More bs now come on you seriously think anyone buys this
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Facts on the ground support this. You can't blame Putin
gandalf wrote: » What is telling is the number of countries who recognise that Crimea is part of Russia. The list isn't long. Cmon na1 humour me
Gatling wrote: » What facts are you apparently speaking about , Now don't use your own scewed opinion as fact
Cheerful Spring wrote: » The evidence is overwhelming and pointless
gandalf wrote: » Nope it wouldn't. Btw na1 the grand total who recognise Crimea as part of Russia is Eight. By any measure that is extremely pathetic.
