recedite wrote: » Even if its the same, its different. A band of pipers marching under a tricolour means something different up there.
jm08 wrote: » I've looked at some images of the Parade in Belfast and it isn't any different to the one in Dublin (except on scale maybe).
recedite wrote: » Maybe in RoI, but you can't blame Failte Ireland for turning the day into a shinnerfest in NI.
jm08 wrote: » You blame Sinn Fein for hijacking St. Patrick's Day - the truth of the matter is that if anyone hijacked it, it is Failte Ireland.
recedite wrote: » I'm not sure what your point is, but if you are somehow saying that the parade was originally a catholic religious event, and for that reason protestants/unionists want no part in it, you are wrong. St. Patrick is the patron saint of all Ireland, and not just nationalists. By the same token, St George and the St. George fleg is for all England, not just white anglo-saxon far-right supporting Englishmen.
jm08 wrote: » No parades on Christmas Day. I'll look forward to see them flown in the Belfast Parade.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Junior setting the DUP up to fire a round at the other foot?
Mr Paisley said that Northern Ireland and the United states have a special relationship. “It's an honour to meet the President of the United States but especially so as our two nations embark upon extending the special relationship in trade and culture," he said. "I will dine with the President and also attend a White House reception. I will be encouraging him to continue to support Northern Ireland. Our cultures are tied by history and trade. We must continue to develop such links.”
jm08 wrote: » St. Patrick's day was a religious (RC) occasion up to fairly recently. Not sure any Orange Order members would be up for that. The DUP won't refer to the Good Friday Agreement as the GFA (because of its RC connotations). They always refer to it as the Belfast Agreement, so I'd say its more that unionists have disowned St. Patrick's Day & Easter, rather than the SF turning them into a sinnerfest.
blanch152 wrote: » Gerry only became leader of Sinn Fein in 1983, yet he was active in republican circles long before that. Are you suggesting he held some other leadership position in the republican movement?
recedite wrote: » Christmas day still is, but that doesn't mean any one religion owns it.
Anyway, keep your eye on the skyline this Paddy's Day and you can still see the odd St. Patrick's flag flying, even around Dublin. They are way outnumbered by tricolours of course, but still around.
jm08 wrote: » St. Patrick's day was a religious (RC) occasion up to fairly recently.
recedite wrote: » Something like that could happen, in the far distant future. It's not written in stone that Paddys Day and Easter must always be shinnerfests in Norn Iron.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Point of information: Gerry started at the top. No clawing required.
recedite wrote: » There's a gig coming up soon on 17th in the White House, and its hard to find a decent comedy duo these days. There's always the chance that the ladies would try to get a dig in against Trump, and we can't be having that. Whereas Gerry will be guaranteed to behave himself because he has been desperately trying to get a ticket to the gig for years. Also Gerry has something in common with The Donald; both have always played by their own rules in clawing their way to the top. Paisley Junior should do what is expected of him, and provide some novelty entertainment value to the assembled US dignitaries. Does he drink champagne, or is he a teetotaller?
jm08 wrote: » Oh, good. I can't wait to see Gregory Campbell & Nigel Dodds leading out the St. Patrick's Day Parade in Belfast.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Maybe Foster and O'Neill declined to be in Trumps company (or one of them did)?
recedite wrote: » DownpatrickThe Fleg
jm08 wrote: » no reason why a British person would get involved in an Irish celebration.
Johnny Dogs wrote: » I was going to suggest that, but surely even the trump admin aren't that dumb? Seems like a logical explanation though.
blanch152 wrote: » Quite possible that they haven't realised that Ian Paisley Senior is dead.
Johnny Dogs wrote: » Would it surprise anyone if (as you say) name value only was the reason? Ian Paisley (jr being insignificant) and Gerry Adams together in the Whitehouse? Trump administration fails to surprise me anymore. I'd put little past them.