Owryan wrote: » https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057806895/1/#post105215745https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057624973/1/#post100426439 Already been done to death
drillyeye wrote: » But not my specific question. How can a country implement UBI without completely closing immigration?
Dylan Sweet Story wrote: » It can't and it's not going to happen here in isolation. The whole question is too hypothetical.
Owryan wrote: » Ask the Finns, they've been trialling the idea.
drillyeye wrote: » "Hello? Is that the finns? Yeah, I have a question..." :P
Owryan wrote: » Hope whoever picks up speaks English. But seriously, surely they had to have some sort of plan for this.
drillyeye wrote: » It might be a another attempt to be the best boy in the class by them, ie run a trial, but let it die after that. The problem, as I see it, first and foremost is that if a country were to actually implement it on national scale.....who wouldn't be tripping over themselves to get there? So if UBI is dead out the gates, then that means automation and increasing unemployment doesn't have a cure.
Owryan wrote: » Social justice Ireland have been campaigning for ubi for a while now. They had a full breakdown of costings and the tax needed to implement it. Naturally they ignored the elephant that you have pointed out. I think ubi has potential but no government would risk bringing it in as it supposed to be supplemented by income from employment, something many in Ireland are allergic to.
drillyeye wrote: » So you agree that the idea is 100% dead in the water, barring every single country implementing it at once, or immigration comes to a dead halt? As I said, I haven't seen this angle on the idea before, and of all the more obtuse head-scratchers (such as inflation mentioned above), immigration surely is the number 1 killer of the proposal, and by a very long shot?
Agricola wrote: » I think in wealthy western economies it's a certainty but probably way off in the distance. 100 years ago the idea of a welfare net to protect people from extreme poverty was faintly ridiculous. 100 years from now, with all the advances in technology and automation coupled with an ever rising population, means UBI is a very realistic scenario in the distant future. The hard part is selling this "communist" idea to societies which are rampantly capitalist and where inequality is growing all the time.
Dylan Sweet Story wrote: » Correct. A German commission in 2013 rejected the idea on several fronts; one of which was a marked increase in immigration, above even what they were willing to accept.
drillyeye wrote: » Fair enough. I'm just surprised that I haven't heard the immigration angle before. And no wonder others would like to avoid it! I think that's it for me, 100% convinced that UBI will never work.
Giovanni Creamy Toy wrote: » It's not a if, but 'when' it shall be introduced. It will probably be on an electronic ID card, that will deny any purchase of boozing, smoking and such like products. All this stuff was covered in previous threads anyway. The migration issue will simply be addressed with much stricter qualifying criteria, and perhaps a move towards points-based systems. If Brexit ever happens, there will be a flavour of sudden increased migration anyway. Hyper-inflation is the only real issue against it.
Arthur Daley wrote: » Or totally open borders. With a period to allow for UBI levels to adjust between countries/purchasing power parity. Don't think it is impossible to see this in our lifetime.We already have open borders from Donegal to Istanbul.
Bob_Marley wrote: » If the moguls in Europe who want European labour to be as cheap labor as possible and European profits as high as possible, don't eventually bring one in, who is going to be able to afford to buy all the crap they need us to buy to keep their money making merry-go-round spinning ?
wakka12 wrote: » Its not even a question of if but when. Automation will eliminate the vast majority of jobs, there simply will not be anywhere close to the number of jobs needed to provide for all the potential work force, so its either UBI or massive poverty and civil unrest
Ulysses Gaze wrote: » We probably need more engineers, IT people and techies from the region.