splinter65 wrote: » Once again I have to tell you I’m not interested in how strangers value me. I gather that’s important to you but I could never understand it. It’s what you do for other people that’s important, not what people think of you, or admire you for what you do, or how much you are appreciated. Starting to feel under appreciated escalates quickly into a general unhappiness that settles and never really leaves. I met a lovely woman yesterday volunteering with the St Vincent De Paul who just goes about looking after people with no ego or fuss whatsoever. She’s totally taken for granted and taken advantage of and she knows that but this is what she wants to do and she’s perfectly happy. Bro Kevin and Sr Stan and Fr McVerry are the same. If your not a woman I heard on the Joe Duffy show some weeks ago then I’ve got you mixed up with someone else and that’s my mistake.
garbo speaks wrote: » I honestly think there is a silent pro-life majority in this country, that will stun the liberal elites come referendum day.
splinter65 wrote: » Oldtree you’ve posted a video being filmed by a socialist party where they’ve stood with an iPhone fixed at a random spot trying to record the amount of people passing on their way to the rally. Crowds are filing past, quite slowly and one of the film makers is trying to count in tens and getting out of breath with the effort. What do you see?
Bannasidhe wrote: » A noble sentiment which I agree with even as I am puzzled by it's relevance to this discussion. Or what prompted you to make it as all I have done is point out where you have commented about what other people think/feel etc. Speak only for yourself and you and I won't have an issue. And I have never been on liveline and never will be.
pitifulgod wrote: » We heard similar in relation to marriage referendum...
RobFowl wrote: » I am pro repeal but am quite disappointed with the ridicule and contempt some pro repeal seem to treat pro lifers with. There is a nasty and arrogant undercurrent which I fear will reduced the chance of this being repealed. Look at the smart comments and glee at over-estimates of the numbers marching today as an example...
garbo speaks wrote: » In the marriage referendum, no one wanted to murder innocent unborn children.
david75 wrote: » So in not at all shocking news the plc are lyinghttps://twitter.com/wsmireland/status/972504704105304065?s=21
amdublin wrote: » I sure will. Twill be all the better after the May referendum when I have full personal bodily autonomy.
uptherebels wrote: » And what evidence do you have to form this opinion?
splinter65 wrote: » Also here there are supporters of very left wing groups which always means a lot of very distorted reality which doesn’t help.
garbo speaks wrote: » Lets talk after referendum day- then you will have your evidence.
uptherebels wrote: » You could have just said you didn't have any and were just making it up:rolleyes:
splinter65 wrote: » If you made this remark on Facebook you’d be called a ****ing twat.
Jimbob1977 wrote: » It's called 'gut feeling'. Everyone has it.
splinter65 wrote: » But no pics of the crowd Dav? Why is that?
Save the 8th campaigners say tens of thousand of people have joined their march this afternoon
Deleted User wrote: » jaysus id march if coverage of all of this could just go away jumpers 100k me hole "some of your side said this so yer all orrible" there isnt 100 voters have changed their mind on this topic all year id bet this is all public onanism (also frowned upon btw)
david75 wrote: » In no universe is this 100k. Why do they bother lying so blatantly?? It’s so bafflinghttps://twitter.com/wsmireland/status/972508279220957189?s=21
david75 wrote: » Loads of pics and video out there. It’s nothing like the numbers they’re claiming. You can only fit 17k max in that part of merrion square. They don’t even have that much there’s massive gaps throughout the crowd and one estimate has it 40% are actually children?!