Omackeral wrote: » Why do concurrent sentences exist at all can anyone tell me? It's like a ''commit one crime, get the second one free'' offer. I don't get it. Basically getting away with it.
screamer wrote: » Because prisons are busting at the seams. I'd love to farm some of the biggest scumbags out to the biggest **** hole prisons in the world. If they got out alive they'd never ever want to go back.
pistolpetes11 wrote: » Brilliant how quickly the UK Courts dealt with this case , he would be still out on bail in Ireland
Sofiztikated wrote: » You can't convict people on what they might do. You might pick up a shovel, and cave someone's skull in, but we don't imprison you for it.
washman3 wrote: » It's exactly because of attitudes like this that these evil scumbags exist.
actaphobia wrote: » I also think it is a class issue - the vigilantes all seem similar in background; certainly they are not middle class
actaphobia wrote: » What disturbs me almost as much as his actions is the behavior of these vigilante groups who effectively stalk these predators. There is something disturbing, something that just doesn't sit right, with the almost gleeful satisfaction of seeing someone else's life ruined, albeit self-inflicted. I've seen some of the social media remarks and it is sickening. I also think it is a class issue - the vigilantes all seem similar in background; certainly they are not middle class
doolox wrote: » Sexual abuse id a huge problem and the root of a lot of alcoholism, drug addiction and other self destructive behaviour among people. THe perpatrators are often former victims themselves and their moral compass has often been destroyed by other monsters in their past lives. I do not know if they can be reformed or made not to repeat their behaviours but the Church made this mistake in moving paedophile priests around the place in the hope that they would reform and not repeat their deeds elsewhere. It seems that only constant and never ending supervision and confinement from general society and full disclosure to responsible members of society will prevent further offences, how to do this without exciting the anger of the rougher and less disciplined members of society, who might be tempted to resort to more sanguinary and rougher solutions to the problem, is a huge dilemma.
Flippyfloppy wrote: » He was blackmailing kids for photos as well
ceadaoin. wrote: » The church didn't make a mistake, they actively covered up crimes and didnt care that the paedophile priests continued abusing. If they did they would have done something about it after the first couple of times a priest had to be moved. They weren't hoping to reform the abuser, only make the problem in that particular area go away when the whispers got too loud.
Flippyfloppy wrote: » Additionally, just after he was caught and his facebook was still active his trips abroad were from countries associated with child sex tourism
Flippyfloppy wrote: » As young as 8 years old 😡
muckbrien wrote: » Plenty of scumbags I'll wager among the paedophile hunters They seem to attract riff raff to their ranks
[Deleted User] wrote: » 1 year and a half?...... Is there any consideration given to child safety at all any more? Did he have to actually rape and brutalise a child like the Athlone case before a more appropriate sentence could be dished out? The sick fúck should have got years not months. Intention with meeting a child to have sex with them and only 18 months???? Sickening
In a plea for mitigation, Martin Giblin SC, defending, said the defendant had a difficult family background and his father had abandoned him when he was six.
The two girls told specialist child interviewers that they were playing on a tree and had not eaten any cake yet.
Flippyfloppy wrote: » And we'd have absolutely no idea of his identity...