Gatling wrote: » Says wholm exactly , You and one ,two others . Not very convincing evidence is it
Cheerful Spring wrote: » but the Kremlin does not go after people they pardon.
na1 wrote: » Bin Laden was involved in attack on 9/11? I don't believe so!https://imgur.com/CRaBPOx
Chrongen wrote: » cnocbui wrote: » And of course you have known many a Senior British intelligence officer and are intimately familiar with their 'style'.Funny, this expertise you have, given that in another thread you claimed Bin Laden had no involvement in 9/11 and yet I posted a video of him boasting about how he masterminded and organised it. Your attempt to try and discredit the source - Steele - is pathetic. John Sipher wrote a piece called The Smearing of Christopher Steele. Sipher happens to be a former CIA officer: Funny, where in that article does he doubt Steele's authenticity? Where does he go on about style and grammar which in his expert opinion should raise doubts? Nowhere. Nothing you say is credible or worthy of anything but derision. This is priceless. You believe a faked video of Bin Laden but you call 3000 IPCC scientists liars. Show me on the FBI website where it mentions that bin Laden had ANYTHING to do with 9/11. Don't give me some crappy fake video. Do you speak arabic? Are the Arabic words in the video corresponding with Bin Laden's lips?
cnocbui wrote: » And of course you have known many a Senior British intelligence officer and are intimately familiar with their 'style'.Funny, this expertise you have, given that in another thread you claimed Bin Laden had no involvement in 9/11 and yet I posted a video of him boasting about how he masterminded and organised it. Your attempt to try and discredit the source - Steele - is pathetic. John Sipher wrote a piece called The Smearing of Christopher Steele. Sipher happens to be a former CIA officer: Funny, where in that article does he doubt Steele's authenticity? Where does he go on about style and grammar which in his expert opinion should raise doubts? Nowhere. Nothing you say is credible or worthy of anything but derision.
Chrongen wrote: » This is priceless. You believe a faked video of Bin Laden but you call 3000 IPCC scientists liars. This video is alleging showing Bin Laden watching himself like a loner. Why would he have someone record him watching TV 9/11 clips from behind?.. And it funny there no frontal shots of his face so people can not do facial recognition. No video taken of him with his kids and family, party pictures, birthdays nothing. When he turns slightly he looks like a different guy to Bin Laden.
cnocbui wrote: » You could hurt Putin far more by ejecting Russia from the SWIFT interbank payment system.
10000maniacs wrote: » Putin is a prick but, this is the third time that Father Dougal's quote has been used in After Hours this week.
cnocbui wrote: » And of course you have known many a Senior British intelligence officer and are intimately familiar with their 'style'. Funny, this expertise you have, given that in another thread you claimed Bin Laden had no involvement in 9/11 and yet I posted a video of him boasting about how he masterminded and organised it. Your attempt to try and discredit the source - Steele - is pathetic. John Sipher wrote a piece called The Smearing of Christopher Steele. Sipher happens to be a former CIA officer: Funny, where in that article does he doubt Steele's authenticity? Where does he go on about style and grammar which in his expert opinion should raise doubts? Nowhere. Nothing you say is credible or worthy of anything but derision.
cnocbui wrote: » Funny, this expertise you have, given that in another thread you claimed Bin Laden had no involvement in 9/11 and yet I posted a video of him boasting about how he masterminded and organised it.
Elmer Blooker wrote: » He was a military intelligence officer who passed information to the British, thats makes him a British spy. If he was a Russian spy who exactly was he spying on? I suppose the fact that he is Russian does make him a Russian spy but then again the British gutter press never let facts get in the way of a good story.
Chrongen wrote: » This chump. Chris Steele, fabricated the crappy dossier laced with grammar errors and written in a style alien to a senior British intelligence officer.
And if you're going to parrot the Bin Laden 9/11 BS that they were harbouring the mastermind of the Twin Tower attacks then you do know that the Afghans offered to hand him over if the US could provide proof of his involvement. They couldn't so attacked anyway. The FBI even had no connection on their website tying Bin Laden to 9/11. Are you aware of that? Or is that more "BS detection"?
Instead, as a career intelligence officer who worked on Russian espionage issues overseas, and in support of FBI counterintelligence investigations domestically, I will focus on the potential intelligence and counterintelligence issues surrounding the memo and its publication.
Billy86 wrote: » I was extremely skeptical on it when the dossier first came about, but it's strange how a lot of these supposed fabrications have been verified and corroborated don't you think?
Shenshen wrote: » They say he's as big as four cats and he's got a retractable leg so's he can leap up at you better. He lights up at night and he's got four ears, two of them are for listening and the other two are kind of back-up ears. His claws are as big as cups and for some reason, he's got a tremendous fear of stamps! He's got magnets on his tail, so's if you're made out of metal he can attach himself to you and instead of a mouth, he's got four arses. That last bit is actually true, and he does talk a lot of sh*te
Chrongen wrote: » Surprised they didn't dump him in the woods with slit wrists and a fake suicide note like they did with David Kelly.
Billy86 wrote: » This is interesting, but really not at all surprising...http://www.news.com.au/world/europe/russian-spy-sergei-skirpal-daughter-yulia-in-fight-for-life-after-reportedly-being-poisoned-with-nerve-gas/news-story/bc9c1a682084b3389d181c1c1820516b
THE former Russian double agent fighting for his life after an apparent poisoning in the UK was ‘close’ to a British investigator associated with the scandalous ‘Trump Dossier,” the UK Telegraph claims. The British newspaper says it has spoken with a security consultant, who wished to remain anonymous, who worked with the same firm as Christopher Steele - the former MI6 agent who assembled a dossier allegedly detailing compromising material Moscow had gathered on President Donald Trump. ... The Telegraph’s report has heightened speculation that Col Skripal is the mysterious Russian agent mentioned on the first page of the Trump Dossier as a source of the information.
Elmer Blooker wrote: » I suppose the fact that he is Russian does make him a Russian spy
Fiery mutant wrote: » He was a Russian spy, who the British turned to spy for them. Try and keep up.
ArchXStanton wrote: » The UN,the most useless organisation that ever came into existence,
Elmer Blooker wrote: » If his life was under threat he would have been given a new identity and kept a low profile, instead he even bought a house in his own name. I doubt if Putin even ever heard of Salisbury. So Putin waits 8 years and tries to bump him off with the election and World Cup weeks away? Right ... By the way, he was NOT a Russian spy, he was in the pay of the British and therefore a British spy but obviously "Russian spy" makes it more spicy for the masses. Cui bono. I suppose that would mean Germany are now the new favourites?
gandalf wrote: » Interesting time for the diminutive one to come out with a quote like this?https://m.independent.ie/world-news/europe/russias-foes-will-be-served-poison-putin-36682387.html Personally I have no doubt the Russians are behind this. The only way to hurt Putin is to damage his internal image and a boycott of the World Cup would be the ideal vehicle for that. Shame floppy Boris has rolled back from that sentiment.
Richard Hillman wrote: » I don't get the outrage of trying to kill Spy's that have flipped, it's all part of the game. It's their patriotic duty to assassinate a Flipped Spy. Not that we have any Spy's but if there was an Irish Spy that turned to the other side, I would want the state to whack him.
and a boycott of the World Cup
Gatling wrote: » Have to say when even the conspiracy nuts are making excuses and claims it says a lot , And it also looks like the UN are calling russian airstrikes on a market in Syria "war crimes"
Russia's President Vladimir Putin has warned his country's enemies they will "be served with poison".
