_Dara_ wrote: » The ideal scenario is that the emergency services are needed as little as possible because rescue work carries a lot of risk even if the personnel are highly trained. It’s also the ideal that they are just needed for unavoidable accidents. To wilfully put yourself in harm’s way because “Shur, we can be rescued” is the height of ignorance and selfishness. A total lack of regard for the safety of those who are obligated to help you.
Mooooo wrote: » Same arguments were made with Ophelia and 4 people died
Dublinlady1513 wrote: » Look people in Dublin, myself included said they'd never take a red warning serious again because of Ophelia. Yet here we are with a red warning and everyone taking it serious.
d'Oracle wrote: » That's good. But you should never have said you'd never take a red warning seriously in the first place. A red warning is them telling you how bad they expect it to get. It is a warning that the weather (which is often unpredictable because its the weather like) is predicted to be very bad. The weather during ophelia was very bad, it just wasn't as widespread bad as was predicted. Bottom line, a red warning is met eireann advising you to take actions to protect yourself and your stuff because the weather could be bad enough to hurt you or your stuff.
Mooooo wrote: » Whatever you think yourself
facehugger99 wrote: » It seems to be the logical conclusion of your argument, not mine.
facehugger99 wrote: » I have strong suspicions that there may be political interference in the country-wide red warning. Easier for the Govt to give all the PS the couple of days off than be dealing with whining from the Unions as to why some people were getting a day off an not others. There's been no logical reason given for a red warning to be in place for some counties that haven't had a flake of snow fall.
d'Oracle wrote: » There will be tonnes of public servants working and trying to get to and from work during this mess. You haven't a damn clue what you are on about. Shout out to all the nurses, doctors, council maintenance staff, emergency responders, emergency coordination staff, vehicle support staff and all the other Public Servants travelling to and from work, facing tough decisions about when and how to get to work and working through all this.
Blud wrote: » Whatever about what happens tonight, there was no reason for a red warning yesterday in Dublin. Yes there was lying snow, but zero need for everything to grind to a halt. ME have created a public expectation that red weather warnings mean offices close, which is dangerous. Why are people so incapable of getting by with s bit of caution? Are we completely useless? Dublin is a major city ffs. There's 2 inches of snow on the ground for the majority of the city - the news is full of tourists dumbfounded in the city centre with not even restaurant to go to, and people stranded at airports with little enough snow that they could kick it off the runway. We've turned so soft. It's not good.
jimmynokia wrote: » There was NO RED WARNING yesterday its today.. Wise up.
Blud wrote: » Quick word on emergency services - a friend of mine is a nurse in Tallaght children's hospital, she left home at 7am this morning on foot for her 8.30 shift, 90 minute walk in, will be in until 8.30 tonight in full knowledge that means staying in the hospital overnight tonight, with her own 4 kids at home with their dad. Incredible dedication. Also baffles me that the nurses there will be staying in the hospital overnight while the doctors and consultants doing the same shifts are being ferried to local hotels. Nurses treated as second class citizens for no good reason.
Blud wrote: » Eh, there was for Dublin and Wicklow. 5am yesterday to book today. Keep your wise up good man.
optogirl wrote: » There is a major storm on the way - it hasn't hit yet. A lot of businesses in city centre will have made a judgement call based on the ability to get home from rather than into work.
Johnny Dogs wrote: » As was said earlier, the people issuing the warnings walk a fairly thin tight rope. No warning for somewhere that got Snow? Whinging. Warnings for areas that ended up gettingt none. Whinging. If it saved one lifeit was worth it.
BarryD2 wrote: » Another problem with these colour coded weather warnings is that there are several grades and the differences just tend to pass the average citizen by. Before they brought these in, the forecaster might say e.g. 'there'll be gales on the Irish Sea' and we knew to expect a windy/ breezy day. Now it's a YELLOW or ORANGE or whatever warning and these pile up after a while. So nervous members of the public are frightened by these warnings whilst the rest just learn to ignore them. It's a bad idea overall, too coarse a measure and too many grades. I know ME have been criticised in the past because people said they weren't warned, when in fact they were, if they bothered to listen properly. But this system tips things too far the other way.
drunkmonkey wrote: » Nanny state gone mad, politicians will pay dearly for this especially Leo and Ross if they’ve got this wrong, not doubting some areas we’ll be covered but telling everyone to be indoors by 4 and not to come out until 3 tomorrow seems like utter madness right now. Hopefully my barkeep isn’t as soft as these pair, heading for a pint around 5ish.
SleetAndSnow wrote: » people in my area saying there was no need and they could have gone to work today (cork city) and be home by 6 and be fine.. I give up
Shadylou wrote: » as far as todays weather, the kids could've gone to school and I could've gone to work quite happily and be in no danger.....I think the warning should've started a lot later
optogirl wrote: » it's not martial law - it's ultimately up to you whether you want to go out in it but the advice is mainly to not drive in a blizzard - the storm has not landed yet and is aswell as the current snow which is already making several parts of the country treacherous.