Ajsoprano wrote: » They are being paid to kick unemployed while they are refusing old people a bit of extra coal during the next few days. Surely that money could be spent on a bit of coal.
[Deleted User] wrote: » No. They are being paid to encourage people back to work and in some cases into work for the first time after years on the dole. Approximately 300,000 people are in receipt of the fuel allowance. I very much doubt that a few cold days after such a mild winter, will affect their ability to keep their homes warm. The elderly especially are well used to budgeting and will be well prepared for a blast of cold weather.
Ajsoprano wrote: » In February after things were getting warmer? I’m sure if elderly deaths are up from freezing you will tell me 1 it’s a symptom of a recovering economy or 2 elderly freeze all the time in the US it saves on nursing home fees
[Deleted User] wrote: » Or 3. It’s the fault of a private company?
Ajsoprano wrote: » I have an idea for a new thread...
Ajsoprano wrote: » Money is being given to a private company. This money could be used for better things like giving the elderly a bit of coal or oil or gas. This stops them from freezing to death. Are you catching on? Stay with me now. Normal people with normal human instincts hate to see elderly people being uncomfortable. They would be delighted if a minister came out and said “get the fuel go the relieving officer don’t be freezing yourself”. What they can’t understand is the man in charge the running out and saying go easy on the coal don’t get yourself in debt. In a recovering economy where we paid one company 58.5 million to kick the homeless. Can you understand that? I have an idea for a new thread will you be available for it or will an other chap do the later shift.
Doctor Jimbob wrote: » If only we had a state department for that and didn't have to outsource it.
[Deleted User] wrote: » But we are spending the money wisely on getting people back to work so they can contribute to the economy through increased spending money and paying taxes. A win-win situation.
Permabear wrote: » This post had been deleted.
Doctor Jimbob wrote: » Any stats to back up these claims of success?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Indeed. It’s a pity an outside company had to be brought in to show how the job should have been done.
listermint wrote: » Tbh I would have gotten back into plumbing myself. Sure plumbers are naming prices most of the time .
Ajsoprano wrote: » 1 quarter of the people who worked for the company for year for free got a job and you call that often?
Ajsoprano wrote: 60 per cent of the people willing to work for free ended up getting a job at something else and didn’t go long term unemployed? What’s the skillsteam stats?
Ajsoprano wrote: » 60 per cent of the people willing to work for free ended up getting a job at something else and didn’t go long term unemployed? What’s the skillsteam stats?
AndrewJRenko wrote: » But when you see 'experience' being offered in stacking shelves and cleaning toilets, it is hard to take it seriously as a scheme to develop the skills of the internees.
Ajsoprano wrote: » I was going to keep chatting to you and the lad that thanks every post that argues with me but I can’t be bothered any more. I don’t believe you honestly feel this way. People are starting to wise up to the recovery of statistic fudging and needy kicking. When the homeless die in the streets over the next few days we will be told of their criminal record before we are told their name. You will say serves them right they shouldn’t have robbed some bread 10 years ago more and more people will role their eyes at you.
weldoninhio wrote: » Jean Valjean is homeless on the streets of Ireland?? Hahahaha