Ajsoprano wrote: » I’m in quite a good situation. It doesn’t help my taxes for helping people in worse situations goes towards private companies who don’t help them.
weldoninhio wrote: » That’s good to hear. Hope you’ve leaned your lesson and have a “rainy day” fund.
Berserker wrote: » Is this the same England that has to provide Irish people with jobs every time the economy here falls apart?
koumi wrote: » what was the lesson?
weldoninhio wrote: » That just because you are making lots of money now, it doesn’t mean this will go on for the rest of your days, so put a bit aside. If that’s too difficult for you to understand ask someone to explain the fable of the squirrel that collected nuts for winter vs the squirrel that didn’t.
Ajsoprano wrote: » So now jobbridge is a private company set up to bash the person with no savings?
VinLieger wrote: » Deflection with feigned ignorance, interesting tactic
Ajsoprano wrote: » I was a plumber in my early 30s making more money than doctors and accountants. All the overtime I wanted. Then things got bad and I was getting a few weeks on a few weeks off a few weeks up north then pretty much nothing. Employers started only offering into the hand work where you had to get social welfare to make up your wage. I refused to avail of this.
Grateful Dread wrote: » To stop acting like Billy-big-boll0x like he did during the boom by throwing cash around he didn't have, keeping up with the Joneses and not securing his family's financial future.
Rory28 wrote: » Its not like he was the only one who didn't see the crash coming. Its all well and good in hindsight saying this but its about as useful as a coq flavoured lolly.
NinetyTwoTeam wrote: » AJ Soprano was always a bit of a moaner. Try being a young person who never had any good job or money to throw about, never had anything to do with the crash whatsoever but was made pay for it, no more free college fees, grants slashed, no jobs for college grads, dole cut to 100.00.
Ajsoprano wrote: » It’s a recovery in name alone.
koumi wrote: » I blew it all on hookers and coke.
Avatar MIA wrote: » :rolleyes:
Ajsoprano wrote: » Compare it to a time when rent was half the price, families weren’t living on pot noodles cooked in hotel kettles, gaurds weren’t getting accused of being peados for doing their job. Murders weren’t being downgraded on a basis of how the figures looked. People weren’t standing in car parks to adjust job numbers. Private companies weren’t getting paid to stand people in car parks to adjust job numbers.
Ajsoprano wrote: » That’s exactly why it’s important to get rid of these schemes and this government for that matter. It’s a recovery in name alone.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I take it you have a gripe with unnamed private companies doing the job that they are paid to do?
Avatar MIA wrote: » [/U] The bold has nothing to do with economics. Underlined - there were always people on such schemes, the private element is semantics. Rent being half the price is a factor of a recovering economy. Families living in hotel rooms. That's a factor of the increasing rents.