Swashbuckler wrote: » Its only in the last two races that I've noticed that when I start to feel really crappy my heart rate is usually at or above 174. It hasn't been a conscious thing ive looked for. As a person, by nature I'm very analytical. I love data points and all that crap so it's just something of note as opposed to a rule. I'll put it to you this way I wouldn't consciously race by heart rate. But I know if I go above a certain level i cant sustain it for very long. The plan going in to Adare was to run as hard as I can for the distance and not bomb out like last week. I feel like I was right on my limit for mile 5 into mile 6. I would consider anything to be honest. Although it would kill me not to have the data afterwards to look at what happened in terms of splits etc. haha
Safiri wrote: » Did you mean 11th March for the next race? If so, that is the county road championships in Kilmallock which I'm pretty sure you have to be a athletics ireland club member to run in as is a club championship.
AuldManKing wrote: » Super work there, its great when hard work gets rewarded with a big PB. You'd a sub 30 5 mile in there too
Duanington wrote: » Got it - and it makes sense to give a good look over the data afterwards etc....BUT I think we can do that to our detriment at times. I think we progress by pushing ourselves in races, by extending those limits bit by bit over time. I wouldn't let the numbers influence you too much P, I think we can fall into a no win situation then because the watch rarely gives you good news during a race ( especially when you feel crap) and the temptation can be to ease off with that " I can't hold that pace\HR for long anyway" doubt being turned from a doubt to a fact in an instant. Obviously there's a balance to be found between going out like a looper and pushing to our limits but I think the live data on a watch can be a) unreliable and b) something we start to lean on a bit too much over time. Especially for these races that aren't necessarily target races, sounds like you managed it very well yesterday but then who's to say that you couldn't have held that HR for a bit longer? ( you dropped the pace right down for the finish after all) The nature of your training will make you stronger as time progresses so why not put that to the test every now and then? Well done again, great to see the progression...lots more to come
AuldManKing wrote: I must read back on your sessions as I reckon they'll be my sessions in the coming weeks/months!
Swashbuckler wrote: » I have them all in an Excel file if that would make your life easier? 14 weeks of good solid 5k and 10k work. Loved every minute. Hoping to go back to that after the Tuamgraney 10 and limerick half. But we'll see what L thinks.
Swashbuckler wrote: » Quick question for anyone who takes the time to read my ramblings..... Specifically on sessions and effort level. I ran a 7x1k today with reducing Recoveries. Target effort level was 5.55 pace so pretty much 10k effort. Are you supposed to maintain the same effort level throughout or should the effort get harder towards the end? By the 7th interval I was probably feeling controlled but somewhere near the effort of the middle/latter stages of a race. Should effort level drop back at this point or should I be pushing through? Does this question even make sense? Haha
OOnegative wrote: Coach is too soft on you in other words, i’d imagine they should feel tougher with the reduced recovery as they go along with the last few feeling like the latter stages of a race. My take on it anyway, your fitter than your telling him!!!
Swashbuckler wrote: » Haha I thought the opposite. Last couple felt like I would late in a race and I was worried that maybe I should be pulling it back to 5.55 effort if that makes sense
OOnegative wrote: As in you were running faster than 5.55 pace? Well knowing L, if he said run them at 5.55 effort that’s what he would like you to do, if you were feeling better than 5.55 effort your in good shape. Well you are in good shape.
Swashbuckler wrote: » I didn't do a great job of explaining. For me 5.55 means 10k effort. So the first 4 or 5 felt like how a would early in a 10k race. Controlled. Effort level OK. Working but not overworking. By the last couple of reps I was working harder. Harder than I was earlier but keeping the same pace of 5.55. So is it right to keep working harder for the last couple of reps. Or should the actual effort level drop back to what the first four or five reps felt like?
Swashbuckler wrote: » Plus I figure until I prove it in a race the numbers mean nothing haha
OOnegative wrote: » I think as long as your maintaining the correct pace but working that bit harder it’s fine, your still achieving the desired effects of the session would be my interpretation of it.
skyblue46 wrote: From what I have read the effort required should increase. I suppose the question is at what point are you putting in more effort to maintain that pace than is the intention of the session. Only coach can tell you that 😀
hot buttered scones wrote: Great question and one I often ask myself, and I also agree with OOnegative. My interpretation of these sessions, especially with the reducing recoveries is that each rep is supposed to be a bit harder than the last, sort of mimicking the fatigue you feel as you progress through a race - teaching you to run fast on tired legs.
Duanington wrote: I wouldn't overthink it P, in and around the prescribed pace is spot on. If you're flapping and gasping at the start of the last one ( like I was on Saturday) then something isn't right but you weren't even close to that from the sounds of things.
Swashbuckler wrote: » To be honest the last interval felt exactly how I'd feel towards the latter parts of a race so I guess my effort level was spot on.
skyblue46 wrote: Good man yourself. I have to admit to having taken great encouragement from reading the approach to racing that your group have. It has given this aul fella the impetus to start giving it everything even if it's a minute a mile slower than you. A super attitude you have. Keep it going!