Hector Bellend wrote: » I have two degrees, several professional qualifications and am pursuing my third degree. I only have a part time job. Pain in the hole
Ajsoprano wrote: » You had to work a year for free to get your job and you think that’s such s good thing that you spend all your time on the Internet defending these schemes? Did they brainwash you there?
Deleted User wrote: » No. I did a business degree which was way outside my experience. I got a €50 top up on my welfare payment for nine months. I proved myself worthy and capable of doing the job to a high standard. I’ve been there full time since. I like to think that by paying my taxes that I’m repaying the confidence shown me. Everyone deserves a chance. I appreciate the one I was given.
[Deleted User] wrote: » No. I did a business degree which was way outside my experience. I got a €50 top up on my welfare payment for nine months. I proved myself worthy and capable of doing the job to a high standard. I’ve been there full time since. I like to think that by paying my taxes that I’m repaying the confidence shown me. Everyone deserves a chance. I appreciate the one I was given.
koumi wrote: » can I ask where you were employed MaryAnne, you don't have to be specific but was it public sector or private, are you still working for same company who hired you through JoBridge?
Deleted User wrote: » Private sector. Yes, same company that I did my JobBridge internship with. They regularly take people on work experience. I was very lucky to be taken on when I was. I found the business studies tough going. Best of all, my kids are so proud of me. I wasn’t the oldest in our year either. I found the difference in ages stimulating. Our group ranged in ages from 18 to 62.
Ajsoprano wrote: » You did a degree. Your first job was an internship for a year. You still started on first year qualified money when they took you on after a year. Because you are willing to do this like a government drone everybody has to do it. The employer wins. Go you helping private corporations erode the quality of life of the average chap coming out of college. Now get back out there and champion that scheme.
Ajsoprano wrote: » Go you helping private corporations erode the quality of life of the average chap coming out of college.
koumi wrote: » The public sector was a different story, there were no qualifications or certification or degrees or available for people to attain. In fact most of them were trotted in and out, if they managed to last the 9 months. Due to the moratorium there were no jobs available, unless you went through an agency but the catch was, they wouldn't hire interns as they were already getting them for free. Different strokes for different folks. How did you obtain a degree in 9 months? Did your employer pay for it too?
Doctor Jimbob wrote: » Jobbridge, for all it's flaws, is a brilliant idea compared to the current nonsense though. At least it gave work experience, although it was abused by some employers. Jobpath is a complete disaster though. They're getting paid vast sums of money to get people to go to an office every now and then to sign stuff. There's absolutely no reason it couldn't be done by intreo staff. As you've said too, the long term unemployed will stay unemployed because there's no benefit to the jobpath companies in taking them on. I got put on jobpath just over a month after finishing my last job, while people who have been unemployed for years are left alone. Anyone who thinks it's reducing long term unemployment is kidding themselves. It's nothing but a waste of money to appease the dole bashers, and by the looks of any thread that starts about it on here, it's working.
mariaalice wrote: » There is no jobbridge it's been discontinued has it not?
Deleted User wrote: » The internship was 9 months. Not the degree. That took 3 years!!!
koumi wrote: » Tough slog, well done.
koumi wrote: » JobBridge was a pretty nasty experiment, especially for those who ended up propping up the public sector, which is what I believed it was designed for and got little but abuse in return for their effort and even more when they attempted to highlight the nature of it. It was a special kind of abuse. Thankfully it was binned however for anyone who hasn't experienced it I doubt there will be much they can relate to so best leave it in a safe place and march onward. (I'm also aware of the absolute mental and psychological affects of schemes like Turas Nua which I suspect will also go the way of JobBridge in due time) Don't take the lack of understanding to heart.
Hitman3000 wrote: » My partner found herself unemployed, went on a jobsbridge placement for 9 months totally different business to what she had experience of. Discovered her calling working full time and looks forward to going to work. Her attitude is it's great being paid to do what you love. It worked for some and didn't for others. Simple.
Deleted User wrote: Totally agree. The problem with JobBridge towards the end was the types of “Internships†they were offering. Car valeting and supermarket jobs come to mind. What people don’t realise is that candidates had to apply for these positions. If they didn’t want these positions, then they didn’t apply.
dhaughton99 wrote: » I finished up on Jobbridge in July working in a college as an IT admin for 900 pupils and staff, 200+ PCs and all the equipment. Done a fantastic job and got great hands on. No job offer from it, they just went a got a TUS worker to replace me. Knocked my confidence for months and really still not over it. 2 weeks after I was gone, I get letter to interview with for the TUS scheme, a week after that, I'm pushed onto Jobpath. Zero faith in Jobpath. Ticking boxes.
mariaalice wrote: » I know you are upset about this but why did you think they would give you a job in the first place did they actually have a job available. I am genuinely don't understand why people would not be happy to receive help in getting a job.
dd972 wrote: » Surely there's opening for skilled tradespeople in the U.K, even if it meant a Ryanair fight back and forth every few weeks.
Ajsoprano wrote: » If after we go to college to learn a job we still need a year in the job to learn it we have a problem with the education system or the employer. What we have done with these schemes is normalized a free working year for any decent job.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Who is working free for a year and in what sector? No matter how well educated one is, they don’t walk into a new job and automatically know everything about it. That will only come with experience.
Permabear wrote: » This post had been deleted.
Ajsoprano wrote: » That is a problem with the education system. Of course they won’t have 20 years of knowledge but every job has entry level stuff people fresh out of school can do. We usually get first years to drill holes as a main job or cut brackets and slowly teach them stuff bit by bit. They get paid 200 a week or something like that. After a year they are on a liveable wage and taking more and more responsibility. I know when most people think plumber they think of some fella fixing toilets but there is way more to the trade than that. If you needed experience and these jobs were so happy to help you gain experience why not bring in apprentice type jobs for them rather than 4 years in college followed mostly by a year of doing the crap nobody else wants to do for free? Seems to me that Fine Gael think the whole college system is not fit for purpose or they want people to work for nothing for a company who can let them go and hire another chap who will work for nothing and let them go and hire another chap that will work for nothing. The wage lowering party.