Stevie777 wrote: » Another issue to consider is that investing in US ETFs will create a significant liability to US Estates Tax.
Taylor365 wrote: » "Based on the information you provided, you're not eligible to open a TD Ameritrade account. If you have any questions or would like to speak to a New Client Consultant, call us at 800-454-9272." Well, i guess that's that.
Dardania wrote: » I've setup a spreadsheet to try understand this issue over 24 years, starting from a notional E1,000 - feel free to twiddle the numbers, and let me know if I've made a bad assumption: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vSeQni67A5rcgf8drQP8KgQIntNSibeG5KSKHX5PgR1TXnsvQ8jymFVGvvvD87f8SYJ0AuAoppVz6mu/pubhtml In some cases, the difference isn't so much, and in other cases it is disastrous for the UCITS scenario. Having Accumulation type ETFs is essential in the UCITS world to be competitive from what I can see - in order to get a big spread compared to income type ETFs from the US.
excitementcity wrote: » Dardania wrote: » I've setup a spreadsheet to try understand this issue over 24 years, starting from a notional E1,000 - feel free to twiddle the numbers, and let me know if I've made a bad assumption: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vSeQni67A5rcgf8drQP8KgQIntNSibeG5KSKHX5PgR1TXnsvQ8jymFVGvvvD87f8SYJ0AuAoppVz6mu/pubhtml In some cases, the difference isn't so much, and in other cases it is disastrous for the UCITS scenario. Having Accumulation type ETFs is essential in the UCITS world to be competitive from what I can see - in order to get a big spread compared to income type ETFs from the US. Dardania just wondering if you have a downloadable version of this spreadsheet? Many thanks
Dardania wrote: » Sorry, try this one: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TgG5Oj_cq7dL8BJoeX8IMiAdk9XPYer5/view?usp=sharing - or if that doesn't work PM me
pan wrote: » Dardania wrote: » Sorry, try this one: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TgG5Oj_cq7dL8BJoeX8IMiAdk9XPYer5/view?usp=sharing - or if that doesn't work PM me Hi Dardania, thanks for the spreadsheet, I also want too rework the numbers a bit. But when I click on the link I had to request access to it (probably with you now). Alternatively, maybe you can make a copy of it on google drive - public permissions. Cheers
excitementcity wrote: » Dardania wrote: » Sorry, try this one: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TgG5Oj_cq7dL8BJoeX8IMiAdk9XPYer5/view?usp=sharing - or if that doesn't work PM me Hi Dardania, many thanks as pan said had to request permissions to access the document so I have sent that through to you. You might accept when you have a moment or as Pan said make public access. Many thanks Separately: maybe you someone has the answer to the following? With the UCITS funds:1. What's the starting point for year 9 after you have paid over your tax in year 8? From your spreadsheet Dardania it seems to be the value of the fund in year 8 minus the tax paid? Is that right? 2. I rang revenue re losses but the guy I spoke with didn't have a clue. I have found conflicting advice online. If you are buying monthly and have a gain in year 8 in one month and a loss in the next month. Are the gains and losses offsetable as long as they are in the same fund and the same tax year? Or is it the case that the losses would just be 0 and you just pay the gains. I understand if they are in different tax years or different funds they're not offsetable. 3. If you choose a distributing fund, it would seem that the dividends are taxable at 41% also? Is this just paid on 8 years or is this paid in your tax return every year? Or how does the tax work on the distributions? I assume an accumulating ETF is the only way to go with a UCITS fund? Thanks as always in advance
Cute Hoor wrote: » What did you tell them? I presume it's not because you are based in Ireland.
dublin2000 wrote: would anyone has any suggestions on specific UCITS funds to buy in? Thanks
TripleAce wrote: » I may be missing something here, please confirm if I am correct: on year 8 with UCITS you pay 41% on profits (I guess if you sell the fund earlier you pay earlier?). With US-ETFs the tax on profit (capital gain) is only 33% . 8% difference seems pretty significant to me, am I missing something?
dickface wrote: » On US ETF's you do not have the option of accumulating ETF's and you must pay an extra witholding tax on dividends earned. You are probably exposed to currency fluctuations (not necessarily bad) and currency conversion costs.
excitementcity wrote: » So unless you go through a US broker (and according to this thread it's not that simple to get them to take you on) it's not possible to do it at the moment. So the options are wait until it's fixed, invest in ucits, somehow invest through a US broker.....unfortunately, investing in Ireland is a massive headache. God bless the US where it's easy. But saying all that I'd rather have 59% of something than no gain at all.
Gordon Gekko wrote: » Does anyone know how the 8 year deemed disposal rule works if at the end of the 8 years you're showing a loss on your UCITS ETF? An example will probably explain my question more clearly: I invest €10,000 at the start of year 1. The market does it's thing over the 8 years with the usual ups and downs. It happens that year 8 coincides with a bear market and I'm down 20% on my initial investment, so that at the 8 year anniversary my UCITS ETF investment is now worth €8,000. Clearly, I owe no deemed disposal tax, so I simply leave the UCITS ETF as is, and thereby it automatically rolls into a 'new' 8 year period. My question is: does Revenue deem my investment to have started afresh at the start of the second 8 year period - and therefore do they rebase my 'acquisition cost' as being €8,000 for the purpose of calculating any gain in the second 8 year period? So if for example we go through a phase of anaemic growth in the second 8 year term, at the end of which my UCITS ETF is worth €10,000 - do Revenue deem me to have made a 'gain' of €2,000 over the second 8-year term, and therefore hit me with 41% of the 'gain' made over the second 8-year term? Meaning I'm at a loss in real terms. Or do they look back to the original acquisition cost of €10,000 at the start of the first 8-year period, and therefore (correctly IMO) view me as having made no gain so far over the life of my holding with that particular UCITS ETF? I can't seem to find a firm answer on this.
Dardania wrote: » No firm answer myself, but my opinion is your second option holds true. I understand the intent of the 8 year deemed disposal is for the government to get their hands earlier on the tax they will be due at the end. So it stands the reason that it is calc'd against the original 10k