mojor wrote: » What's the best method of reporting these bags before they are torn open by animals/birds?
Max Powers wrote: » Definitely gotten worse last couple years IMO, can't help but think all the stuff spoken on hard left, has had a negative effect, certain parties and politicians were (not so much since water bills died) out saying you shouldn't have to pay for this, that and everything else.this has IMO emboldened some people to do this more, someone else will sort it, complete lack of civic/national pride, complete lack of taking responsibility for oneself, laziness,etc etc. Wouldn't be surprised to hear some glib comment about paying for baby food instead of bin charges or some nonsense.in my experience, it ain't empty baby food boxes I see dumped, generally its white goods, beer cans, other general stuff, often on roads that they drove to dump their stuff. Answer is probably more enforcement, proving possibly payment for some form of waste payment if suspected, more cctv, naming and shaming, pictures in the paper,etc etc
Wanderer78 wrote: » the polluter pays is a flawed idea though, and if we dont rectify it soon, i suspect our illegal dumping issues will increase as more and more opt out
Max Powers wrote: I think its a good idea in the main.
Wanderer78 wrote: » It is a good idea, but not fully thought through, or some very important elements have been omitted, either intentionally or unintentionally. 'The polluter' is seen effectively and exclusively as the end user, but this isn't necessarily true or isn't the whole truth. I do believe we need a holistic approach to waste management soon, or I do suspect we 'll have more and more people optting out of this thinking leading to further illegal dumping, and other illegal and environmentally unfriendly methods to dispose of their waste.
Finnbar01 wrote: » I think the best thing we could do is scrap all of this recycling nonsense. Go back to one weekly collection per week. Forget about black, green and brown bins and burn the rubbish in an incinerator. If we do it that way, it would be more friendly to the environment, better for human health, save money and resources, and generate energy via burning.
Outkast_IRE wrote: » I have spoken about this at length on other threads but i have a few key ideas that would really lessen this growing problem. 1. All rented accomodation should have a requirement in law to have a waste collection service included as part of the rent. 2. To follow on from point 1 . All local authority homes and homes rented under various schemes must have waste collection included as part of the rent. 3. A database should be setup to be shared by all waste companies and accessible by local government listing all properties in the area and who the waste collection is with. If they dont have any then a call from a litter warden or similar to explain how they are disposing of waste. The 3 things above along with a big push in schools etc to bring sweet wrappers, bottles etc home with you and not dump them on the street.
zurbfoundation wrote: » Councils are starting this work on who disposes of who's waste. However your first point on rented accommodation, why would there be an emphasis on rental accommodation and not owner occupied for example?
Harry Palmr wrote: » Yep, there was rubbish on the Old Tramore Road (inside the ring road) in a field gate and in that more elaborate gate area on the other side of the road in the last week.
Deleted User wrote: » Its happening constantly on Manor street.
Harry Palmr wrote: » Just seen the Corpo lads clearing up on the Old Tramore road gateway just inside the ORR. Well done lads and will the ignorant fecker who keeps dumping black bags there please stop.
Deise Vu wrote: » I saw the mess there this morning. Its a relief to hear the Council are cleaning it up but they absolutely shouldn't have to be doing it constantly on that stretch of road. I would love to see a law brought in that anyone dumping illegally from a vehicle has that vehicle seized and sold to pay for the clean ups. Fines are never going to make any difference to people who don't pay them anyway.
sunnysoutheast wrote: » As far as I'm aware if people are caught and pay the fines to the council their details can not be made public and the fines are low. Only if taken to court for non-payment are they then identified. It's even worse when it's bags of cans, bottles etc. which can be recycled at supermarkets. A rubbish bag and as much recycling as you want is €4 at kilbarry. A full car of recyclables is less than a fiver at Greenstar. No excuses. They should have their picture published next to the mess they made in the local papers. Or made to clean it up.
Wanderer78 wrote: » does naming and shaming actually work in reality?