MrPudding wrote: » I have not checked your link, but I don't believe that applies in Ireland, and it certainly doesn't in the UK. I can (though I wouldn't, there is that pesky choice thing again) sit on my ass and watch a child drown, and there would be no legal consequences. If that child happened to be my child (I have a bunch of kids, because whilst I am pro-choice I am, not pro-abortion. A pro-abortionist with 4 kids and no abortions is pretty crap at it), then there is a duty of care, but there is no duty of care to strangers. In addition to that, the duty of care would only apply to a human in being, similar to why abortion is nit murder. The offence of murder has very specific requirements, the main one being the entity being murdered must be a human in being, a born person. MrP
Brendan Eager Stud wrote: » i.e. abortion is a form of contraception?
Billy86 wrote: » I was in the middle of posting just that, it's quite the convenient overlap that so many against sex before marriage would also likely be against same sex marriage don't ya think?
i.e. abortion is a form of contraception?
JDD wrote: » i.e. abortion is a form of contraception? Well, as a medical term, no, as conception has already occurred so nothing could be "contra" to it i.e. nothing can prevent something that has already occurred. I'm not a doctor but I guess a suggested medical term would be contragravidity, or something that prevents continuation of a pregnancy. So there you go. The Pill, condoms and the coil are methods of contraception. Abortion is a method of contragravidity. Does that help?
Edward M wrote: » In some states in america unlawful killing of a fetus is considered as can be considered as homicide. This dissent include abortion of course, but the killing of a fetus during the commission of a crime. Its interesting that in such cases the fetus is recognised as human.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unborn_Victims_of_Violence_Act
JDD wrote: » Well, as a medical term, no, as conception has already occurred so nothing could be "contra" to it i.e. nothing can prevent something that has already occurred. I'm not a doctor but I guess a suggested medical term would be contragravidity, or something that prevents continuation of a pregnancy. So there you go. The Pill, condoms and the coil are methods of contraception. Abortion is a method of contragravidity. Does that help?
kylith wrote: » A culture of no sex before marriage had the Magdalene laundries doing a roaring trade, back in the day. And the lack of sex ed meant that girls didn't even know how what sex was or how pregnancy happened.
2wsxcde3 wrote: » Yet again, here we have people mindlessly repeating anti-Catholic propaganda they've been fed by the media without actually doing their own research:
Zubeneschamali wrote: » When one study contradicts "conventional wisdom", meaning lots and lots of studies, you should not bet the farm on it. Here is a response citing some of those studies.
2wsxcde3 wrote: » Its not just one study:Sharp rise in sexually transmitted diseases in Ireland in past decadeThe number of people with common sexually transmitted infections in Ireland has risen sharply over the past decade, a new Europe-wide report shows. The incidence of gonorrhoea in Ireland increased fourfold while the rate of infection with syphilis and chlamydia doubled, according to the report from the European Centre for Disease Control.(Source: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/sharp-rise-in-sexually-transmitted-diseases-in-ireland-in-past-decade-1.2360741 )Rise in STIs because it’s easier to get sex nowThe incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Ireland rose again in 2017, with hundreds more cases of gonorrhea, herpes and chlamydia, according to the HSE’s health protection surveillance centre.(Source: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/rise-in-stis-because-its-easier-to-get-sex-now-3mnk9r0z3 ) While things weren't perfect in Ireland in the past, all in all they were better than what we have today with contraception and sex ed being thrown at young people sexualizing them more than they want to be. More teen pregnancies, more STIs. We have more of these NOW, not less than in the past.
WhiteRoses wrote: » No they were not better. Women were a mans property and treated like dirt, sexual assaults were always blamed on the woman’s ‘promiscuousness’ while the man got off scot free. Children were treated disgracefully, particularly when born out of wedlock, they were second class citizens, because of their illegitimacy. And that’s without even touching on the mother and baby homes, septic tanks, clergy abuse and the Magdalene laundries. I thank my lucky stars that I wasn’t alive during those times because the situation was horrible. What that generation went through is nothing to hold dear or aspire to. Rose tinted glasses or what.
WhiteRoses wrote: » Children were treated disgracefully, particularly when born out of wedlock, they were second class citizens, because of their illegitimacy.
2wsxcde3 wrote: » Its a great Ireland now if you only follow the Medias propaganda. Things like the following get very little coverage:Tusla failed to report 800 allegations of child sexual abuseOver 800 allegations all relating to child sexual abuse in Laois and Offaly lay dormant in an office in Portlaoise for years — and were only discovered by a Tusla worker in 2015. As a result of this, hundreds of children who alleged they were sexually abused were left in “dangerous and potentially violent situations”(Source: https://www.buzz.ie/news/tusla-failed-to-report-800-allegations-of-child-sexual-abuse-225107 ) Best not to talk too much about these children. It might detract from the medias propaganda against the dark days of the Catholic church. We have a higher suicide rate now, higher levels of anxiety, higher rates of unplanned pregnancies, higher rates of broken families, higher rates of STIs. While old Ireland wasn't perfect, it was better than what we have now. The statistics bear that out.
2wsxcde3 wrote: » We have a higher suicide rate now, higher levels of anxiety, higher rates of unplanned pregnancies, higher rates of broken families, higher rates of STIs. While old Ireland wasn't perfect, it was better than what we have now. The statistics bear that out.
bubblypop wrote: » We have a much more open society now, where thankfully people are not afraid to speak about their issues.
bubblypop wrote: » All those things you mention are just spoken about & reported more now.
2wsxcde3 wrote: » Not afraid to talk about their issues?Fine Gael councillor to face disciplinary hearing over comments about Islam (Source: http://www.thejournal.ie/councillor-brian-murphy-twitter-3589108-Sep2017/ ) The media tells people what they can and can't say nowadays. It is a mortal sin to be pro-life or talk about immigration etc. There is a new church in town, and we are all forced to attend anytime we turn on the TV or radio.
2wsxcde3 wrote: » Yet again, here we have people mindlessly repeating anti-Catholic propaganda they've been fed by the media without actually doing their own research:Teenage pregnancies decline as funding for sex education is cutThe state’s efforts to teach adolescents about sex and make access to contraceptives easier may have encouraged risky behaviour rather than curbed it, the research suggests.(Source: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sex-education-funding-cuts-drive-decline-in-teenage-pregnancies-n67v6mnzr )
2wsxcde3 wrote: » Not afraid to talk about their issues?Fine Gael councillor to face disciplinary hearing over comments about Islam (Source: http://www.thejournal.ie/councillor-brian-murphy-twitter-3589108-Sep2017/ )
NuMarvel wrote: » If you want to reduce or prevent abortions, it's clear that reducing the number of crisis pregnancies is the way to go.
2wsxcde3 wrote: » That's a big claim. You'd need to provide proof of that.
2wsxcde3 wrote: » You don't need a link for the obvious.
2wsxcde3 wrote: » I agree. I think we should all be able to agree on that point. That's where the focus should be, not on bringing in abortion.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » But what about bigoted FG councillors who are being oppressed on Twitter?
2wsxcde3 wrote: » I agree. I think we should all be able to agree on that point. That's where the focus should be, not on bringing in barring access to abortion.