robinph wrote: » Which licence would that be then? There is no licence required to purchase or carry guns in Florida, unless it is concealed. It is also apparently illegal for anyone to keep a list of who even has a gun?!?!https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_the_United_States_by_state
recedite wrote: » I stand corrected about the licence. Its a very laid back regime in Florida. Presumably they could still have confiscated the guns though, after the tip-offs.
jaykay74 wrote: » Pretty sick and ugly stuff from Trump. To try and turn a school shooting where 17 people are murdered back to serving his own interest. The worst thing is that its not shocking, its whats normal now.https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/965075589274177536
Igotadose wrote: » Sorry, you're wrong yet again. Here's the ATF's statement: "On Thursday morning, the A.T.F. agent in charge of South Florida said at a news conference that Cruz had legally purchased the AR-15 assault-style rifle used in the shooting. Federal gun laws only bar people from buying guns under very specific criteria, such as felony convictions, domestic-violence misdemeanors, dishonorable discharge from the military, and other disqualifiers. When it comes to mental health, only people who have been involuntarily committed––a relatively high bar––are banned from buying guns under federal law."
Water John wrote: » You may have missed this tweet; General McMaster forgot to say that the results of the 2016 election were not impacted or changed by the Russians and that the only Collusion was between Russia and Crooked H, the DNC and the Dems. Remember the Dirty Dossier, Uranium, Speeches, Emails and the Podesta Company!http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-mcmaster-russia-indictments-1.4541021
Leroy42 wrote: » [...] Or is it, that he is saying what a great job he has done and how lucky all these people are to meet him?
Leroy42 wrote: » Is there a point to it? Yes. The point is that nothing else matters as much as he does. Nothing is as important as himself, and his feelings. The point is to continue to try to discredit and investigation in the hope that IF it every does come up with anything that he can call on his supporters to call it fake news. The man cites "No Collusion" when we already know that he son, son-in-law, and campaign chief already tried to collude. The only defense they have come up with, after the initial lies were debunked was that both Kushner and Manafort walked out of the meeting (although never brought it to the attention of the FBI) and the Trump Jr is somewhat naive and a bit simple really. And thats it. There is one common theme in everything this man does, and that theme is Trump. Even look at the pictures of him visiting the hospital the other day for those caught up in the school shooting. A thumps up! A mean for what? That isn't it a spectacular success that only 17 people died? Or is he giving a thumps up to the medical service, which in many cases will be paid for by plans taken out under Obamacare? Or is it, that he is saying what a great job he has done and how lucky all these people are to meet him?
Christy42 wrote: » Has anyone said what the FBI could have done under the law at this point? He had committed no crime that I can see before the massacre. Was he danger, yes absolutely but I see no way they could respond to that and remove his gun or his right to purchase a new gun.
Christy42 wrote: » However Trunk blames the FBI to reduce the trust further into Mueller's investigation. To remove trust in anything that us not him.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » The drip drip effect of these tweets will erode support further. He's oblivious to the fact that his narcissistic lack of sensitivity shines through every tweet.
Water John wrote: » BTW, where's Rubio in all this? Didn't he get one of the highest donations from the NRA? Each State should start implementing strong gun laws. As much as they can get away with, under the Constitution.
Brian? wrote: » The sad thing, to me, is it won't erode his support. It'll harden his already fanatical support.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » His fanatical support will vote for him no matter what he does. Personally, I would put that at about 30%. It's the relatively centrist/floating people that will continue to turn away from him. If the Dems address the reasons why people voted for Trump and put forward credible candidates then Trump will become a toxic hot potato for the GOP.
david75 wrote: » He’s become that and they’ve had a few opportunities to tackle it and either haven’t the balls or it suits them.