Authorities also said students and teachers should remain barricaded in the school until they could be reached by police Dispatch at the Broward Sheriff’s Office confirmed the school was on lockdown and police were on location. According to WSVN, the Margate Fire Rescue team described the scene as a mass casualty incident, which reportedly means at least 20 people were injured.
pumpkin4life wrote: » Exactly, and that's why banning guns/restricting purchases of guns ain't going to do anything. Think of the NRA as a manifestation of the consciousness of people who want their second amendments intact. There's more guns than people in America:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimated_number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country If I was a mass shooter lad, it would be easy as pie to get some weapons, even if there was a blanket ban on guns tomorrow. If I'm that committed, if I'm that much of a sick fùck, I'll find something, I'll figure something out. So suppose you ban all guns or restrict the purchases. The ban will fly over people's heads. Joke law. Guards here can't even stop lads smoking a joint over here like. So to properly enforce the law, the government will have to start going into people's houses and take the guns by force. That's Soviet Union what the did level right there.Gun laws will never, ever work, when your country is flooded with them already, unless you're willing to go the whole way.
baylah17 wrote: My only surprise is that others are surprised by this latest attack, the 8th school shooting in the USA this year. To be honest if the Americans are happy to have their kids slaughtered then why should the rest of the world care.
bnt wrote: » We don't know that this guy used a bump stock or anything like that, do we? This article includes a discussion of the audio, which seems to suggest he was not. The AR-15 is basically a semi-automatic "civilian" version of the M16, and can fire as fast as you can pull the trigger, with better accuracy than if on full auto. There should be no illusion that the lack of a full auto mode makes a weapon any less dangerous. Less indiscriminate, perhaps.
silverharp wrote: » that number might be exaggerated , they include suicides which may even happen in the middle of the night but 1 is too many in fairness
Wilberto wrote: » That's the fourth variation of that statistic that I've seen in this thread alone. The others being 13th, 17th, and 18th. :pac:
pumpkin4life wrote: » There's 300+ million guns floating around America. He would have found something if he wanted to easily enough.
jbt123 wrote: Multitudes of kids throughput the world have mental health issues/learning difficulties and are socially awkward but they don't shoot up their schools...... I wonder where the problem lies..
Cookie_Monster wrote: » how about tackling the US culture, since it's the actual problem, not guns. how many other first world countries allow reasonably free access to firearms and have nothing even close to the same problems? The issue here is Americans, not guns** - availability of certain rapid fire weapons undoubtedly is a problem as well though Interestingly gun sales and ownership rates have collapsed recently, so much so Remington has gone bankrupt this week
Wibbs wrote: » Aye, it's not just the guns, though they're the obvious factor and the one people quite understandably focus on. Consider that in 1920's America you could get a Thompson machine gun by mail order. A Tommy gun. In case of "bandits". Yep. 200 bucks and wait by your mailbox. Not just Tommy guns, guns of all types were much easier to acquire. And it was in many ways a more lawless time. Well apparently fear of bandits was a thing. Police coverage was pretty thin outside urban centres(and even within them). Yet mass shootings of any sort were vanishingly rare. In the interim years gun ownership has had more and more legislation attached to it and it's much more regulated by comparison, yet mass shootings over the last 20-30 years have increased exponentially. So clearly there are other factors at play in the American psyche that have changed in that time. I would strongly suspect that these factors would mean that if you could remove all firearms at the snap of a finger, you'd continue to have mass attacks by other means. Of course as CM notes rapid fire weapons are most certainly a factor and the factor as far as the number of victims in a short period of time goes. They need to start to look more closely at why so many people, usually young men, in American society become so deranged by their environment that they resort to such murderous acts. Mind you, that may be a much harder nut to crack than gun regulation, as it would mean looking very hard at why something in the American Dream™ has turned rotten.
colbarr wrote: » God needs to get his finger out of his arse and start answering those prayers!
Pauliedragon wrote: » The terrorists don't need to bother. Just relax and watch them kill each other.
weldoninhio wrote: » Thats close to $3000 in todays money. I doubt many people back then had access to that kind of cash.
Ulysses Gaze wrote: » Access to firearms is one problem. I think the bigger problem is the fact that 50 million Americans are heavily addicted to Psychotropic/Psychiatric drugs. Mix the two together and..... Good article here on this from the Huff Posthttps://www.huffingtonpost.com/hyla-cass-md/is-it-drugs-not-guns-that_b_2393385.html
Wibbs wrote: » More like $2500. Still within reach enough that they were a best selling firearm. Never mind and contrary to popular belief that people can pick up a "Saturday Night Special" for 2o bucks guns are not exactly cheap today. EG a Colt AR-15 is around the 1000 quid mark and can go well north of that depending on options(used prices vary depending on model and rarity). As a hobby collecting firearms is not a cheap pursuit.
valoren wrote: » I think the problem is never going to go away and thus policy needs to change from the deluded idea that this can be prevented and must focus completely on containment i.e. reducing the potential number of fatalities.
Christy42 wrote: » Why? Are Americans that fundamentally different to other human beings? It will be tough admittedly due to their culture but the very fact that it simply does not happen in other countries is an indicator that yes you can absolutely have a place where this does not happen.
pumpkin4life wrote: » Yeah, it's the same personality cropping up again and again for mass shootings as well. White lad, broken home, Cluster B personality disorder, psychiatric drugs, crap with women/virgin/hates women, bullied, creeps people out, often above average intelligence, very nihilistic, very introverted. Go back and read up on mass shootings. That profile above will match the vast majority of them.
siblers wrote: » Some Americans feel so strongly about their right to hold arms, that if it was taken away from them, it would result in serious civil unrest. Could easily see scenarios where groups of NRA nuts would form militias and and end up fighting to the end rather than give up their arms. Especially in places in the deep south
NIMAN wrote: » Probably a kid that was bullied all his life by other kids. I don't think its fair just to call him a weirdo. He's a weirdo for a reason.
steddyeddy wrote: » Well the weirdos are the ones who don't think guns are a problem in the US.
Berserker wrote: » I know plenty of people who are of that mindset and I certainly wouldn't classify them as weirdos. Americans have this very strange relationship with guns. You probably have to live there and get to know them to even begin to understand it. It's hard to grasp and people from this part of the world will probably never fully get it, I certainly didn't but it's unfair to call them weirdos. I've been to ranges in the USA and the people in there are probably the nicest people I came across in the USA.
pilly wrote: » If we've grown so weary of hearing these stories that we don't even bat an eyelid anymore how must the average sane American feel? I honestly wouldn't live there if someone paid me a million a week.